A pilot study of simple interventions to improve informed consent in clinical research: Feasibility, approach, and results

Background: Research suggests that participants do not always adequately understand studies. While some consent interventions increase understanding, methodologic challenges have been raised in studying consent outside of actual trial settings. This study examined the feasibility of testing two consent interventions in actual studies and measured effectiveness of interventions in improving understanding. Methods: Participants enrolling in any of eight ongoing clinical trials were sequentially assigned to one of three different informed consent strategies for enrollment in their clinical trial. Control participants received standard consent procedures for their trial. Participants in the first intervention arm received a bulleted fact sheet summarizing key study information. Participants in the second intervention arm received the bulleted fact sheet and also engaged in a feedback Q&A session. Later, patients answered closed- and open-ended questions to assess patient understanding and literacy. Descriptive statistics, Wilcoxon -Mann -Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests were generated to assess correlations; regression analysis determined predictors of understanding. Results: 144 participants enrolled. Using regression analysis, participants receiving the second intervention scored 7.6 percentage points higher (p = .02) on open-ended questions about understanding than participants in the control, although unadjusted comparisons did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions: Our study supports the hypothesis that patients receiving both bulleted fact sheets and a Q&A session had higher understanding compared to standard consent. Fact sheets and short structured dialog are quick to administer and easy to replicate across studies and should be tested in larger samples.

[1]  E. Emanuel,et al.  Quality-improvement research and informed consent. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  N. Kass,et al.  Length and Complexity of US and International HIV Consent Forms from Federal HIV Network Trials , 2011, Journal of general internal medicine.

[3]  N. Rader,et al.  Informing the Elderly: A Comparison of Four Methods , 1986, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[4]  Pilot study demonstrating effectiveness of targeted education to improve informed consent understanding in AIDS clinical trials , 2011, AIDS care.

[5]  C K Daugherty,et al.  Quantitative analysis of ethical issues in phase I trials: a survey interview of 144 advanced cancer patients. , 2000, IRB.

[6]  J. Paul,et al.  Patient understanding of research: developing and testing of a new questionnaire. , 2007, European journal of cancer care.

[7]  Carome Ma Is informed consent always necessary for randomized, controlled trials? , 1999 .

[8]  N. Kass,et al.  Rapid estimate of adult literacy in medicine: feasible by telephone? , 2010, Family medicine.

[9]  K. Tatsuoka,et al.  Open-Ended Versus Multiple-Choice Response Formats—It Does Make a Difference for Diagnostic Purposes , 1987 .

[10]  B. Cassileth,et al.  Informed consent -- why are its goals imperfectly realized? , 1980, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  A. Abd-Elsayed,et al.  A randomized controlled study to assess patients' understanding of and consenting for clinical trials using two different consent form presentations. , 2012, Minerva anestesiologica.

[12]  E. J. Mayeaux,et al.  Rapid estimate of adult literacy in medicine: a shortened screening instrument. , 1993, Family medicine.

[13]  L. Lasagna,et al.  OBTAINING INFORMED CONSENT: FORM OR SUBSTANCE , 1970 .

[14]  R. Marois,et al.  Capacity limits of information processing in the brain , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[15]  Steven Joffe,et al.  Quality of informed consent in cancer clinical trials: a cross-sectional survey , 2001, The Lancet.

[16]  K D Hopper,et al.  Informed consent forms for clinical and research imaging procedures: how much do patients understand? , 1995, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[17]  C. Grady,et al.  Comprehension and informed consent: assessing the effect of a short consent form. , 2010, IRB.

[18]  S. Bull,et al.  Tailoring Information Provision and Consent Processes to Research Contexts: The Value of Rapid Assessments , 2012, Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE.

[19]  R. Gmelin Myopia at West Point: past and present. , 1976, Military medicine.

[20]  S. Piantadosi,et al.  Are informed consent forms that describe clinical oncology research protocols readable by most patients and their families? , 1994, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  Taub Ha,et al.  A reevaluation of informed consent in the elderly: a method for improving comprehension through direct testing. , 1984 .

[22]  D A Murphy,et al.  Improving comprehension and recall of information for an HIV vaccine trial among women at risk for HIV: reading level simplification and inclusion of pictures to illustrate key concepts. , 1999, AIDS education and prevention : official publication of the International Society for AIDS Education.

[23]  J. W. Gardner,et al.  Health, Education, and Welfare. , 1965, Science.

[24]  C. Rotimi,et al.  Tailoring Consent to Context: Designing an Appropriate Consent Process for a Biomedical Study in a Low Income Setting , 2009, PLoS neglected tropical diseases.

[25]  J. Drazen,et al.  Informed consent and SUPPORT. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  Sean Tunis,et al.  Addressing low-risk comparative effectiveness research in proposed changes to US federal regulations governing research. , 2012, JAMA.

[27]  M. Reni,et al.  Informed consent as an ethical requirement in clinical trials: an old, but still unresolved issue. An observational study to evaluate patient's informed consent comprehension , 2013, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[28]  D. Bramley,et al.  An Analysis of the Readability of Patient Information and Consent forms used in Research Studies in Anaesthesia in Australia and New Zealand , 2012, Anaesthesia and intensive care.

[29]  V Wadey,et al.  THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PATIENT VERBALIZATION ON INFORMED CONSENT , 1995, Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie.

[30]  D. Cooper,et al.  Effects of two formats of informed consent on knowledge amongst persons with advanced HIV disease in a clinical trial of didanosine. , 1994, Patient education and counseling.

[31]  L. Tamariz,et al.  Improving the Informed Consent Process for Research Subjects with Low Literacy: A Systematic Review , 2012, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[32]  D. Stryer,et al.  Practical clinical trials: increasing the value of clinical research for decision making in clinical and health policy. , 2003, JAMA.

[33]  P. Hewett,et al.  How Informed are Clients Who Consent? A Mixed-Method Evaluation of Comprehension Among Clients of Male Circumcision Services in Zambia and Swaziland , 2013, AIDS and Behavior.

[34]  M. Jefford,et al.  Longer consent forms for clinical trials compromise patient understanding: so why are they lengthening? , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[35]  P. Appelbaum,et al.  Information disclosure, subject understanding, and informed consent in psychiatric research , 1988, Law and human behavior.

[36]  D. DeMets,et al.  How informed is informed consent?: The BHAT experience , 1981 .

[37]  G. E. Kline,et al.  The elderly and informed consent: effects of vocabulary level and corrected feedback. , 1981, Experimental aging research.

[38]  R. Liberman,et al.  Informed consent: assessment of comprehension. , 1998, The American journal of psychiatry.

[39]  Merrick Zwarenstein,et al.  The role for pragmatic randomized controlled trials (pRCTs) in comparative effectiveness research , 2012, Clinical trials.

[40]  Meade Cd,et al.  Consent forms: how to determine and improve their readability. , 1992 .

[41]  D C McCrory,et al.  Empirical research on informed consent. An annotated bibliography. , 1999, The Hastings Center report.

[42]  Hsiao-fang Cheng A Comparison of Multiple‐Choice and Open‐Ended Response Formats for the Assessment of Listening Proficiency in English , 2004 .

[43]  P. Appelbaum,et al.  The MacArthur Treatment Competence Study. II , 1995, Law and human behavior.

[44]  G. A. Miller THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[45]  E Bjørn,et al.  Can the written information to research subjects be improved?--an empirical study. , 1999, Journal of medical ethics.

[46]  H. Riecken,et al.  Informed consent to biomedical research in Veterans Administration Hospitals. , 1982, JAMA.

[47]  R. Rivera,et al.  Evaluating the readability of informed consent forms used in contraceptive clinical trials , 1992, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[48]  S. Koyfman,et al.  Consent form heterogeneity in cancer trials: the cooperative group and institutional review board gap. , 2013, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[49]  J. Holland,et al.  Patients', parents', and oncologists' perceptions of informed consent for bone marrow transplantation. , 1989, Medical and pediatric oncology.

[50]  Linda Franck,et al.  Research participant information sheets are difficult to read. , 2004, Bulletin of medical ethics.

[51]  Robert Edson,et al.  Evaluating the quality of informed consent , 2005, Clinical trials.

[52]  I. Olver,et al.  The adequacy of consent forms for informing patients entering oncological clinical trials. , 1995, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[53]  N. Aaronson,et al.  Telephone-based nursing intervention improves the effectiveness of the informed consent process in cancer clinical trials. , 1996, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[54]  M. Boccia,et al.  The effect of format modifications and reading comprehension on recall of informed consent information by low-income parents: a comparison of print, video, and computer-based presentations. , 2004, Patient education and counseling.

[55]  P S Appelbaum,et al.  False hopes and best data: consent to research and the therapeutic misconception. , 1987, The Hastings Center report.

[56]  J. Tyson,et al.  Conventional consent with opting in versus simplified consent with opting out: an exploratory trial for studies that do not increase patient risk. , 1998, The Journal of pediatrics.

[57]  K. Cox,et al.  Psychosocial aspects of participation in early anticancer drug trials. Report of a pilot study. , 1996, Cancer nursing.

[58]  James Flory,et al.  Interventions to improve research participants' understanding in informed consent for research: a systematic review. , 2004, JAMA.

[59]  G. Morrow,et al.  How readable are subject consent forms? , 1980, JAMA.

[60]  D. Schillinger,et al.  Use of a modified informed consent process among vulnerable patients: a descriptive study , 2007, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[61]  L. Roberts,et al.  Conducting empirical research on informed consent: challenges and questions. , 2003, IRB.

[62]  T. Cooper Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. , 1976, Military medicine.

[63]  P. A. Kelly,et al.  Readability of pediatric biomedical research informed consent forms. , 1990, Pediatrics.

[64]  R. Barbarash,et al.  The Deaconess Informed Consent Comprehension Test: An Assessment Tool for Clinical Research Subjects , 1996, Pharmacotherapy.

[65]  P W Lavori,et al.  Improving informed consent in clinical trials: a duty to experiment. , 1999, Controlled clinical trials.

[66]  Matthew E Falagas,et al.  Informed consent: how much and what do patients understand? , 2009, American journal of surgery.

[67]  A Booklet on Participants’ Rights to Improve Consent for Clinical Research: A Randomized Trial , 2012, PloS one.

[68]  D. Drotar,et al.  Communication of randomization in childhood leukemia trials. , 2004, JAMA.

[69]  G. Kok,et al.  Patients' perceptions on informed consent and the quality of information disclosure in clinical trials. , 1996, Patient education and counseling.

[70]  H. Taub,et al.  The effect of repeated testing upon comprehension of informed consent materials by elderly volunteers. , 1983, Experimental aging research.

[71]  D. Elbourne,et al.  Making sense of randomization; responses of parents of critically ill babies to random allocation of treatment in a clinical trial. , 1997, Social science & medicine.

[72]  S. Edwards,et al.  Lay public's understanding of equipoise and randomisation in randomised controlled trials. , 2005, Health technology assessment.

[73]  S. Joffe,et al.  “Entering a clinical trial: Is it right for you?” , 2012, Cancer.

[74]  D. Marlowe,et al.  Monetary incentives improve recall of research consent information: it pays to remember. , 2009, Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology.

[75]  B. Kaye Informed consent—Why are its goals imperfectly realized? , 1980 .

[76]  C. Grady,et al.  Is Longer Always Better , 2008 .

[77]  H. Taub,et al.  Readability of informed consent forms for research in a Veterans Administration medical center. , 1983, JAMA.

[78]  J. Holland,et al.  Informed consent for investigational chemotherapy: patients' and physicians' perceptions. , 1984, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[79]  M. Ratain,et al.  Perceptions of cancer patients and their physicians involved in phase I trials. , 1995, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[80]  L. White,et al.  Informed consent for medical research: common discrepancies and readability. , 1996, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[81]  M. Levitt,et al.  Modifying a standard industry clinical trial consent form improves patient information retention as part of the informed consent process. , 2001, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[82]  Y. Kita,et al.  A Randomized Controlled Trial of Short and Standard-Length Consent Forms for a Genetic Cohort Study: Is Longer Better? , 2012, Journal of epidemiology.

[83]  M. Carome Is informed consent always necessary for randomized, controlled trials? , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[84]  D C McCrory,et al.  Getting Meaningful Informed Consent from Older Adults: A Structured Literature Review of Empirical Research , 1998, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[85]  Roger L. Williams The use of a test to determine that consent is informed. , 1977, Military medicine.

[86]  S. Gabram,et al.  Informed consent for research: a study to evaluate readability and processability to effect change. , 1995, Journal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research.

[87]  J. Ogloff,et al.  Are research participants truly informed? Readability of informed consent forms used in research. , 1991, Ethics & behavior.

[88]  S. Goodman,et al.  An intervention to improve cancer patients' understanding of early-phase clinical trials. , 2009, IRB.

[89]  R. Holcombe,et al.  Informed consent for clinical trials: a comparative study of standard versus simplified forms. , 1998, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[90]  P. Appelbaum,et al.  The MacArthur Treatment Competence Study. III , 1995, Law and human behavior.

[91]  L. Roth,et al.  Informed consent in psychiatric research: preliminary findings from an ongoing investigation. , 1985, Social science & medicine.

[92]  E F Cook,et al.  Quality of informed consent: a new measure of understanding among research subjects. , 2001, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[93]  F. E. Freeberg,et al.  Informed consent documents: increasing comprehension by reducing reading level. , 1990, IRB.

[94]  L. Fallowfield,et al.  Evaluation of an educational program to improve communication with patients about early-phase trial participation. , 2012, The oncologist.

[95]  Adam A. Nishimura,et al.  Improving understanding in the research informed consent process: a systematic review of 54 interventions tested in randomized control trials , 2013, BMC Medical Ethics.

[96]  H. Masur,et al.  The impact of disease severity on the informed consent process in clinical research. , 1996, The American journal of medicine.

[97]  B. Schackman,et al.  The Use of an Educational Video During Informed Consent in an HIV Clinical Trial in Haiti , 2006, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes.

[98]  Nancy E. Kass,et al.  Repeated Assessments of Informed Consent Comprehension among HIV-Infected Participants of a Three-Year Clinical Trial in Botswana , 2011, PloS one.

[99]  N. Lynöe,et al.  Informed consent: study of quality of information given to participants in a clinical trial. , 1991, BMJ.

[100]  M. A. Baily,et al.  Harming through protection? , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[101]  R. Ashford,et al.  Obtaining informed consent. , 2002, Hospital medicine.