Publishing a Master’s Thesis: A Guide for Novice Authors

Publication of original research, clinical experiences, and critical reviews of literature are vital to the growth of the genetic counseling field, delivery of genetic counseling services, and professional development of genetic counselors. Busy clinical schedules, lack of time and funding, and training that emphasizes clinical skills over research skills may make it difficult for new genetic counselors to turn their thesis projects into publications. This paper summarizes and elaborates upon a presentation aimed at de-mystifying the publishing process given at the 2008 National Society of Genetic Counselors Annual Education Conference. Specific topics include familiarizing prospective authors, particularly genetic counseling students, with the basics of the publication process and related ethical considerations. Former students’ experiences with publishing master’s theses also are described in hopes of encouraging new genetic counselors to submit for publication papers based on their thesis projects.

[1]  Mabel Chew,et al.  Life and times of the impact factor: retrospective analysis of trends for seven medical journals (1994-2005) and their Editors' views. , 2007, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[2]  Julia Andersen,et al.  Journal impact factor in the era of expanding literature. , 2006, Journal of microbiology, immunology, and infection = Wei mian yu gan ran za zhi.

[3]  G. Annas,et al.  Peer review in the balance. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  Irene Hames,et al.  Peer Review and Manuscript Management in Scientific Journals , 2007 .

[5]  Miguel Roig,et al.  Plagiarism and Paraphrasing Criteria of College and University Professors , 2001 .

[6]  Tuyen D. Nguyen,et al.  Authorship Ethics: Issues and Suggested Guidelines for the Helping Professions. , 2006 .

[7]  B. Wijnhoven,et al.  Fate of manuscripts declined by the British Journal of Surgery , 2010, The British journal of surgery.

[8]  W. Grody,et al.  Sharing GJB2/GJB6 Genetic Test Information with Family Members , 2007, Journal of Genetic Counseling.

[9]  Jon Weil,et al.  Peer Review: An Essential Step in the Publishing Process , 2004, Journal of Genetic Counseling.

[10]  Brenda L. Russell,et al.  Faculty-Student Collaborations: Ethics and Satisfaction in Authorship Credit , 2005 .

[11]  Merriam-Webster,et al.  The Merriam Webster Dictionary , 1983 .

[12]  Adam Keen,et al.  Writing for publication: pressures, barriers and support strategies. , 2007, Nurse education today.

[13]  A. Wilcox,et al.  The Fate of Epidemiologic Manuscripts: A Study of Papers Submitted to Epidemiology , 2007, Epidemiology.

[14]  Thomas J Liesegang,et al.  The outcome of manuscripts submitted to the American Journal of Ophthalmology between 2002 and 2003. , 2007, American journal of ophthalmology.

[15]  Stephen B. Thomas,et al.  The Use of Family Health Histories to Address Health Disparities in an African American Community , 2007, Health promotion practice.

[16]  B. LeRoy,et al.  Ethical and Professional Challenges Posed by Patients with Genetic Concerns: A Report of Focus Group Discussions with Genetic Counselors, Physicians, and Nurses , 2001, Journal of Genetic Counseling.

[17]  Keith M. Davis,et al.  A Scholarly Writing Resource for Counselor Educators and Their Students , 2008 .

[18]  D. Beeson.  Nuance, Complexity, and Context: Qualitative Methods in Genetic Counseling Research , 1997, Journal of Genetic Counseling.

[19]  M. Fine,et al.  Reflections on determining authorship credit and authorship order on faculty-student collaborations , 1993 .

[20]  Castl Survey.  The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching , 1910, Nature.

[21]  Alexa B. Kimball,et al.  Fate of manuscripts declined by the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. , 2008, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[22]  Sun Huh,et al.  Peer Review and Manuscript Management in Scientific Journals: Guidelines for Good Practice , 2008, Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.

[23]  D. Greenwood,et al.  Selective attrition and bias in a longitudinal health survey among survivors of a disaster , 2007, BMC medical research methodology.

[24]  The Impact Factor Game , 2006, PLoS medicine.

[25]  W. Abdullah.  Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore , 1988 .

[26]  S. Stith.  Student-Faculty Collaborative Research. , 1992 .

[27]  M. Holaday,et al.  Authorship Credit and Ethical Guidelines , 1995 .

[28]  Publication ethics: an examination of authorship practices. , 2005, American journal of health behavior.

[29]  J. Driscoll,et al.  Writing an article for publication: an open invitation , 2002 .

[30]  Tam Cam Ha,et al.  The journal impact factor: too much of an impact? , 2006, Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore.

[31]  How to Write a Research Article for the Journal of Genetic Counseling , 2003, Journal of Genetic Counseling.

[32]  C. Huether,et al.  Genetic counselors and research: Current practices and future directions , 2006, American journal of medical genetics. Part C, Seminars in medical genetics.

[33]  Julianne East,et al.  The problem of plagiarism in academic culture , 2006 .

[34]  K. Zier,et al.  Publications by students doing a year of full-time research: what are realistic expectations? , 2008, The American journal of medicine.

[35]  S. Domchek,et al.  Satisfaction with genetic counseling for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations among African American women. , 2006, Patient education and counseling.

[36]  W. McGaghie.  Scholarship, publication, and career advancement in health professions education: AMEE Guide No. 43 , 2009, Medical teacher.

[37]  E. Boyer.  Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate , 1990 .

[38]  James D. Lester.  The Research Paper Handbook , 1995 .

[39]  Elizabeth Wager,et al.  Are reviewers suggested by authors as good as those chosen by editors? Results of a rater-blinded, retrospective study , 2006, BMC medicine.

[40]  P. Thompson,et al.  How to choose the right journal for your manuscript. , 2007, Chest.

[41]  Margaret Gibelman,et al.  A QUEST FOR CITATIONS? AN ANALYSIS OF AND COMMENTARY ON THE TREND TOWARD MULTIPLE AUTHORSHIP , 1999 .

[42]  D. Benos,et al.  The ups and downs of peer review. , 2007, Advances in physiology education.