Optimization of Speed Hump Profiles Based on Vehicle Dynamic Performance Modeling

Speed humps are in widespread use around the world. Despite their effective performance in increasing safety, they cause considerable damage to vehicles and discomfort to drivers and passengers. This paper investigates the dynamic response of vehicles on different types of speed humps using a multibody simulation software package that is popular in the automotive industry. Following this evaluation, two new profiles are recommended to optimize the dynamic performance of speed humps. A series of formulas are also presented to estimate the dynamic performance of passenger cars on flat-topped and parabolic humps based on vehicle speed, hump dimensions, and driving behavior while traversing the hump. The results show that, for flat-topped humps, the ramp length (or entrance slope) has the greatest effect on vehicle performance. It is found that the dynamic performance of the recommended profiles is much better than that of conventional humps.

[1]  Y. N. Al-Nassar,et al.  Dynamic considerations of speed control humps , 1982 .

[2]  Ana Tsui Moreno,et al.  A New Traffic-Calming Device: Speed Kidney , 2012 .

[3]  Masoud Shariatpanahi,et al.  Multiobjective shape optimization of speed humps , 2008 .

[4]  Hesham Rakha,et al.  A field evaluation case study of the environmental and energy impacts of traffic calming , 2009 .

[5]  John P. Braaksma,et al.  TOWARDS A NORTH AMERICAN GEOMETRIC DESIGN STANDARD FOR SPEED HUMPS , 2000 .

[6]  Reid Ewing,et al.  Quasi-Experimental Study of Traffic Calming Measures in New York City , 2013 .

[7]  Dalibor Pešić,et al.  The Influence of Speed Bumps Heights to the Decrease of the Vehicle Speed – Belgrade Experience , 2013 .

[8]  Geert Wets,et al.  A simulator study on the impact of traffic calming measures in urban areas on driving behavior and workload. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  Lars Leden,et al.  Distance between speed humps and pedestrian crossings: does it matter? , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[10]  Rufin Makarewicz,et al.  Predicted effects of a speed bump on light vehicle noise , 2006 .

[11]  G R Watts.  ROAD HUMPS FOR THE CONTROL OF VEHICLE SPEEDS , 1973 .

[12]  James A. Bonneson.  Side Friction and Speed as Controls for Horizontal Curve Design , 1999 .

[13]  Gordon E. Andrews,et al.  Quantifying the Effects of Traffic Calming on Emissions Using On-road Measurements , 2005 .

[14]  Eric T. Donnell,et al.  Analyzing the influence of median cross-section design on highway safety using vehicle dynamics simulations. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[15]  Y. Samim Ünlüsoy,et al.  Optimization of Speed Control Hump Profiles , 2009 .

[16]  Sunday Ayoola Oke,et al.  Vehicle speed control using road bumps , 2004 .

[17]  Margaret M. Peden,et al.  World Report on Road Traffic Injury Prevention , 2004 .

[18]  J R Jarvis.  AN INVESTIGATION OF ROAD HUMPS FOR USE ON BUS ROUTES , 1992 .

[19]  K Schlabbach,et al.  TRAFFIC CALMING IN EUROPE , 1997 .

[20]  S. Zein,et al.  Safety Benefits of Traffic Calming , 1997 .

[21]  Ana Tsui Moreno,et al.  Traffic Microsimulation Study to Evaluate the Effect of Type and Spacing of Traffic Calming Devices on Capacity , 2011 .

[22]  Osama A. Abaza,et al.  Optimization of Speed Control Hump Spacing , 2012 .

[23]  Mehdi Behzad,et al.  Experimental and numerical investigation of the effect of a speed bump on car noise emission level , 2007 .