Detection of Small Metastatic Brain Tumors: Comparison of 3D Contrast-Enhanced Whole-Brain Black-Blood Imaging and MP-RAGE Imaging

Objective:Early and accurate diagnosis of small metastatic brain tumors may affect outcomes and treatment strategies. For this reason, 3-dimensional (3D) thin-section imaging is preferred. However, with conventional contrast-enhanced (CE) 3D imaging, such as magnetization-prepared rapid gradient echo (MP-RAGE), many visually enhanced vessels may mimic small metastatic tumors, hindering tumor detection. CE black-blood single-slab 3D turbo-spin echo imaging (BB-ssTSE) was recently developed, which uses variable refocusing flip angles and flow-sensitizing gradient schemes, to enhance metastatic brain tumors while selectively suppressing blood vessels. The purpose of this work was to investigate the efficiency of the proposed CE BB-ssTSE in detecting small metastatic brain tumors as compared with conventional MP-RAGE. Materials and Methods:Numerical comparisons of MP-RAGE and BB-ssTSE were performed by simulation studies to investigate the signal/contrast behaviors of flowing blood and stationary CE tumors. For in vivo studies, we enrolled 35 patients (18 women; mean age, 58.1 years) with breast or lung cancer who underwent brain magnetic resonance imaging. After administering a double dose of contrast medium, whole-brain 2-dimensional T1-weighted imaging followed by high-resolution isotropic 3D BB-ssTSE and MP-RAGE was performed at 3.0 T. Two reviewers independently evaluated the presence of metastatic brain tumors using: (1) MP-RAGE; (2) BB-ssTSE; and (3) MP-RAGE + BB-ssTSE sequentially in 3 review sessions, 2 weeks apart. The lesions were classified by size into 2 groups: large (≥5 mm) and small (<5 mm). Both reviewers marked all tumors detected at each session. Another reviewer combined the results of the 2 reviewers and compared the detection rates of metastatic brain tumors between BB-ssTSE and MP-RAGE by using follow-up imaging. Intraclass correlation coefficients between the 2 reviewers were measured. Results:Numerical simulations showed that the proposed BB-ssTSE effectively attenuated the signal intensity of flowing blood over the entire echo train, resulting in CE tumor-to-white matter contrast comparable with conventional MP-RAGE. The combined evaluation of MP-RAGE + BB-ssTSE showed 242 tumors in 28 patients. Of these, 153 lesions were <5 mm. MP-RAGE found 111 small metastatic brain tumors, BB-ssTSE found 150, and MP-RAGE + BB-ssTSE found 153. Significantly, more small tumors were detected by BB-ssTSE than MP-RAGE (P = 0.001, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). All large tumors were detected similarly by both MP-RAGE and BB-ssTSE. By combined results for MP-RAGE + BB-ssTSE, sensitivities for detection of small metastatic tumors were 72.5% for MP-RAGE and 98.0% for BB-ssTSE (P < 0.0001, McNemar test). Intraclass correlation coefficients between the 2 reviewers were 0.826 for MP-RAGE and 0.954 for BB-ssTSE. Conclusion:Compared with conventional MP-RAGE, the proposed CE BB-ssTSE imaging, which enhances tumors while selectively suppressing blood vessels, leads to significantly better detection of small metastatic brain tumors <5 mm.

[1]  K. Hess,et al.  Neurocognition in patients with brain metastases treated with radiosurgery or radiosurgery plus whole-brain irradiation: a randomised controlled trial. , 2009, The Lancet. Oncology.

[2]  Eung Yeop Kim,et al.  Contrast‐enhanced, three‐dimensional, whole‐brain, black‐blood imaging: Application to small brain metastases , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  Richard G. Spencer,et al.  Direct simulation of spin echoes by summation of isochromats , 1996 .

[4]  W. Hall,et al.  Brain metastases: Histology, multiplicity, surgery, and survival , 1996 .

[5]  S. Higano,et al.  Usefulness of Contrast-Enhanced T1-Weighted Sampling Perfection with Application-Optimized Contrasts by Using Different Flip Angle Evolutions in Detection of Small Brain Metastasis at 3T MR Imaging: Comparison with Magnetization-Prepared Rapid Acquisition of Gradient Echo Imaging , 2009, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[6]  H. Ellinger-Ziegelbauer,et al.  The Role of Residual Gadolinium in the Induction of Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis-Like Skin Lesions in Rats , 2011, Investigative radiology.

[7]  Y. Higuchi,et al.  Gamma knife surgery for 1–10 brain metastases without prophylactic whole-brain radiation therapy: analysis of cases meeting the Japanese prospective multi-institute study (JLGK0901) inclusion criteria , 2010, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[8]  D Chien,et al.  Fast selective black blood MR imaging. , 1991, Radiology.

[9]  L. Abrey,et al.  Current management of metastatic brain disease , 2009, Neurotherapeutics.

[10]  S. Schoenberg,et al.  Brain Tumor Enhancement in MR Imaging at 3 Tesla: Comparison of SNR and CNR Gain Using TSE and GRE Techniques , 2007, Investigative radiology.

[11]  M. Kitajima,et al.  Detection of brain metastasis at 3T: comparison among SE, IR-FSE and 3D-GRE sequences , 2007, European Radiology.

[12]  W. Yuh,et al.  The effect of contrast dose, imaging time, and lesion size in the MR detection of intracerebral metastasis. , 1995, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[13]  Tarek Mekhail,et al.  Adjuvant Whole-Brain Radiotherapy Versus Observation after Radiosurgery or Surgical Resection of One to Three Cerebral Metastases: Results of the EORTC 22952-26001 Study , 2011, Current oncology reports.

[14]  G. Press,et al.  Increased detection of intracranial metastases with intravenous Gd-DTPA. , 1987, Radiology.

[15]  R L Ehman,et al.  Flow artifact reduction in MRI: A review of the roles of gradient moment nulling and spatial presaturation , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  S. Hassenbusch,et al.  The Role of Tumor Size in the Radiosurgical Management of Patients with Ambiguous Brain Metastases , 2003, Neurosurgery.

[17]  W. Yuh,et al.  Effects of contrast dose, delayed imaging, and magnetization transfer saturation on gadolinium‐enhanced MR imaging of brain lesions , 1997, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[18]  K. Yamashita,et al.  3D Turbo Spin-Echo Sequence with Motion-Sensitized Driven-Equilibrium Preparation for Detection of Brain Metastases on 3T MR Imaging , 2011, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[19]  M. Harada,et al.  Difference in Enhancement Between Spin Echo and 3-Dimensional Fast Spoiled Gradient Recalled Acquisition in Steady State Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Brain Metastasis at 3-T Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2008, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[20]  Kenneth E Ekstrand,et al.  Use of 3.0-T MRI for stereotactic radiosurgery planning for treatment of brain metastases: a single-institution retrospective review. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[21]  Y. Inaba,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Evaluation of Brain Metastases From Systemic Malignances With Two Doses of Gadobutrol 1.0 M Compared With Gadoteridol: A Multicenter, Phase II/III Study in Patients With Known or Suspected Brain Metastases , 2011, Investigative radiology.

[22]  R. Felix,et al.  Time-dependent changes in image contrast in brain tumors after gadolinium-DTPA. , 1986, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.