Integrating environmental and spatial processes in ecological community dynamics.

The processes controlling the abundances of species across multiple sites form the cornerstone of modern ecology. In these metacommunities, the relative importance of local environmental and regional spatial processes is currently hotly debated, especially in terms of the validity of neutral model. I collected 158 published data sets with information on community structure, environmental and spatial variables. I showed that approximately 50% of the variation in community composition is explained by both environmental and spatial variables. The majority of the data sets were structured by species-sorting dynamics (SS), followed by a combination of SS and mass-effect dynamics. While neutral processes were the only structuring process in 8% of the collected natural communities, disregarding neutral dispersal processes would result in missing important patterns in 37% of the studied communities. Moreover, metacommunity characteristics such as dispersal type, habitat type and spatial scale predicted part of the detected variation in metacommunity structure.

[1]  Kalle Ruokolainen,et al.  Dispersal, Environment, and Floristic Variation of Western Amazonian Forests , 2003, Science.

[2]  Stephen R. Carpenter,et al.  Ecological community description using the food web, species abundance, and body size , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  M. Holyoak.  Habitat subdivision causes changes in food web structure , 2000 .

[4]  Michel Loreau,et al.  Community Patterns in Source‐Sink Metacommunities , 2003, The American Naturalist.

[5]  B. McGill.  A test of the unified neutral theory of biodiversity , 2003, Nature.

[6]  S. Levin.  The problem of pattern and scale in ecology , 1992 .

[7]  S. Levin.  THE PROBLEM OF PATTERN AND SCALE IN ECOLOGY , 1992 .

[8]  Jonathan M. Chase,et al.  The role of habitat connectivity and landscape geometry in experimental zooplankton metacommunities , 2002 .

[9]  A. Hastings.  Disturbance, coexistence, history, and competition for space , 1980 .

[10]  Gonzalez,et al.  Metapopulation dynamics, abundance, and distribution in a microecosystem , 1998, Science.

[11]  Christina Gloeckner,et al.  Modern Applied Statistics With S , 2003 .

[12]  Benjamin Gilbert,et al.  Neutrality, niches, and dispersal in a temperate forest understory. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  B. Finlay.  Global Dispersal of Free-Living Microbial Eukaryote Species , 2002, Science.

[14]  Marcelino Fuentes.  Seed dispersal and tree species diversity , 2002 .

[15]  P. Legendre,et al.  Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation , 1992 .

[16]  Jonathan M. Chase,et al.  The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology , 2004 .

[17]  Rampal S Etienne,et al.  Confronting different models of community structure to species-abundance data: a Bayesian model comparison. , 2005, Ecology letters.

[18]  Stephen P. Hubbell,et al.  Neutral theory in community ecology and the hypothesis of functional equivalence , 2005 .

[19]  Stephen P. Hubbell,et al.  Beta-Diversity in Tropical Forest Trees , 2002, Science.

[20]  D. Tilman.  Competition and Biodiversity in Spatially Structured Habitats , 1994 .

[21]  G. De’ath,et al.  CLASSIFICATION AND REGRESSION TREES: A POWERFUL YET SIMPLE TECHNIQUE FOR ECOLOGICAL DATA ANALYSIS , 2000 .

[22]  Michel Loreau,et al.  Coexistence in Metacommunities: The Regional Similarity Hypothesis , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[23]  L. Meester,et al.  ZOOPLANKTON METACOMMUNITY STRUCTURE: REGIONAL VS. LOCAL PROCESSES IN HIGHLY INTERCONNECTED PONDS , 2003 .

[24]  Jérôme Chave,et al.  Neutral theory and community ecology , 2004 .

[25]  Jens-Christian Svenning,et al.  Diversity and dominance in palm (Arecaceae) communities in terra firme forests in the western Amazon basin , 2004 .

[26]  C. Cannon,et al.  Tree species distributions across five habitats in a Bornean rain forest , 2004 .

[27]  Á. Duque,et al.  Different floristic patterns of woody understorey and canopy plants in Colombian Amazonia , 2002, Journal of Tropical Ecology.

[28]  Jessica Gurevitch,et al.  Ecography 25: 553 -- 557, 2002 , 2022 .