Rigorous-simulation pinch-technology refined approach for process synthesis of the water-gas shift reaction system in an IGCC process with carbon capture

Integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) technology is becoming increasingly more competitive among advanced power generation systems suitable for carbon capture. As an emerging technology, many different IGCC process configurations have been heuristically proposed to meet even more aggressive economic and environmental goals. One attractive design combines gasification with a water–gas shift (WGS) reaction system, pressure swing adsorption, and chemical-looping combustion (CLC) for CO2 removal prior to feeding the fuel gas to the combined cycle for power production. The WGS reaction step is required to convert CO to CO2 and the extent of conversion is determined by the degree of carbon capture required in the CLC step. As a first towards optimizing the overall energy efficiency of this IGCC process, we apply heat exchanger network synthesis (HENS) to the WGS reaction system. This particular part of the process was chosen because of its evident integration potential (steam required for the WGS reactions can be generated by recovering energy released by the same reactions) and the influence of some of the gasifier parameters (temperature and pressure) on its performance and on all the subsequent parts of the process. After generating alternative designs using Aspen Energy Analyzer (AEA), the HENS problem was formulated in the sequential-modular Aspen Plus simulator using a process superstructure approach and solved by mixed integer nonlinear programming (MINLP) algorithms. The HENS capability is implemented as CAPE-OPEN (CO) compliant unit operation and makes use of MINLP algorithms, namely Generalized Bender's Decomposition (GBD), Outer Approximation (OA), Equality Relaxation (ER), Augmented Penalty (AP), and Simulated Annealing (SA). This MINLP-based HENS was used in the CO-compliant Aspen Plus simulator to obtain a design for the WGS reaction system that provided a cost of energy for the IGCC system with CO2 capture that was 28% lower than the base case.

[1]  Urmila M. Diwekar,et al.  Introduction to Applied Optimization , 2020, Springer Optimization and Its Applications.

[2]  Thokozani Majozi,et al.  PROCESS INTEGRATION AS AN OPTIMIZATION TOOL IN CLEAN COAL TECHNOLOGY: A FOCUS ON IGCC , 2009 .

[3]  R. J. Copeland,et al.  Analysis of the sorbent energy transfer system (SETS) for power generation and CO2 capture , 2003 .

[4]  Bodo Linnhoff,et al.  A User guide on process integration for the efficient use of energy , 1994 .

[5]  Yehia M. El-Sayed,et al.  Revealing the cost-efficiency trends of the design concepts of energy-intensive systems , 1999 .

[6]  E. E. Vlaswinkel Energetic Analysis and Optimisation of an Integrated Coal Gasification-Combined Cycle Power Plant , 1992 .

[7]  Dieter Boer,et al.  Integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) process simulation and optimization , 2010, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[8]  Urmila M. Diwekar,et al.  An efficient sampling technique for off-line quality control , 1997 .

[9]  Andrew Forbes Alexander Hoadley,et al.  Process integration analysis of a brown coal-fired power station with CO2 capture and storage and lignite drying , 2009 .

[10]  Edward S. Rubin,et al.  Efficient handling of the implicit constraints problem for the ASPEN MINLP synthesizer , 1993 .

[11]  Majid Saffar-Avval,et al.  Efficient design of feedwater heaters network in steam power plants using pinch technology and exergy analysis , 2008 .

[12]  M. Gallio,et al.  Combined production of hydrogen and power from heavy oil gasification: Pinch analysis, thermodynamic and economic evaluations , 2010 .

[13]  Edward S. Rubin,et al.  An MINLP process synthesizer for a sequential modular simulator , 1992 .

[14]  Richard D. Doctor,et al.  KRW oxygen-blown gasification combined cycle: Carbon dioxide recovery, transport, and disposal , 1996 .

[15]  William Johns,et al.  Computer‐Aided Chemical Engineering , 2011 .

[16]  Zachary Hoffman,et al.  Simulation and economic evaluation of coal gasification with SETS reforming process for power production , 2005 .

[17]  Ying Wang,et al.  Performance of an Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle System with Different System Integration Options , 2010 .

[18]  Thokozani Majozi,et al.  Environmental Design of IGCC through Pinch Analysis, Process Integration and Parameters Analysis , 2009 .

[19]  Edward S. Rubin,et al.  Synthesizing optimal flowsheets; Applications to IGCC system environmental control , 1992 .