Directionally selective shading control in maritime sub-tropical and temperate climates: Life cycle energy implications for office buildings

Abstract Scheduling directionally selective shading devices to increase or decrease their level of occlusion relative to the total incoming solar radiation has the benefit of controlling solar heat gain during a variety of sky conditions and allowing more constant illuminance levels to be achieved within a building. In this study, hourly sky condition and annual solar angles were used to describe the tilt of the slats of an external directionally selective shading control for an external venetian blind on an office building in Melbourne and Brisbane, Australia. The life cycle energy demand associated with this shading control was compared to a static base case with an external overhang and internal venetians. The analysis was extended to the HVAC system which was sized to account for the effect of the shading on solar gain and the artificial lighting requirement. It was found that the embodied energy of the HVAC and shading components accounted for between 21.7% and 25.5% of the total life cycle energy of these systems over 25 years. There was a reduction in embodied and operational energy requirements over a 25 year life cycle for the external venetian blind control of 24.9% for Melbourne and 24.0% for Brisbane relative to the static base case. Based on the simulation results, office buildings with equator facing facades located in similar climates and latitudes may have the potential for equivalent life cycle energy reductions when external directionally selective shading controls are employed to moderate overheating and daylighting.

[1]  G. Treloar Extracting Embodied Energy Paths from Input–Output Tables: Towards an Input–Output-based Hybrid Energy Analysis Method , 1997 .

[2]  Tadj Oreszczyn,et al.  Occupant control of passive systems: the use of Venetian blinds , 2001 .

[3]  Robert Clear,et al.  Office Worker Response to an Automated Venetian Blind and Electric Lighting System: A Pilot Study , 1998 .

[4]  Ravi Prakash,et al.  Life cycle energy analysis of buildings: An overview , 2010 .

[5]  S. Szokolay,et al.  Introduction to Architectural Science: The Basis of Sustainable Design , 2004 .

[6]  Nur Demirbilek,et al.  Potential of Reducing Cooling Loads through Architectural Design and Mixed-Mode Systems in Medium Rise Office Buildings in Brisbane , 2004 .

[7]  M S. Rea,et al.  Window blind occlusion: a pilot study , 1984 .

[8]  Anca D. Galasiu,et al.  Occupant preferences and satisfaction with the luminous environment and control systems in daylit offices: a literature review , 2006 .

[9]  Stéphane Citherlet,et al.  Window and advanced glazing systems life cycle assessment , 2000 .

[10]  Syazwani Mohd Ali,et al.  LOW ENERGY CONSUMPTION HVAC SYSTEMS FOR GREEN BUILDINGS USING CHILLED BEAM TECHNOLOGY , 2013 .

[11]  Crawford Robert Database of Embodied Energy and Water Values for Materials , 2017 .

[12]  Belinda L Collins,et al.  Window blinds as a potential energy saver: a case study. Building science series (final). [Effects of building orientation] , 1978 .

[13]  J. Klems,et al.  Solar Heat Gain Coefficient of Complex Fenestrations with a Venetian Blind for Differing Slat Tilt Angles , 1996 .

[14]  Paul Strachan,et al.  Practical application of uncertainty analysis , 2001 .

[15]  Stephen Selkowitz,et al.  Thermal and daylighting performance of an automated venetian blind and lighting system in a full-scale private office , 1998 .

[16]  L Roche Summertime performance of an automated lighting and blinds control system , 2002 .

[17]  Kevin Van Den Wymelenberg,et al.  Visual Comfort, Discomfort Glare, and Occupant Fenestration Control: Developing a Research Agenda , 2014 .

[18]  Andreas K. Athienitis,et al.  Manually-operated window shade patterns in office buildings: A critical review , 2013 .

[19]  Maria Kolokotroni,et al.  Environmental impact analysis for typical office facades , 2004 .

[20]  Marc Fontoynont,et al.  The use of shading systems in VDU task offices: A pilot study , 2006 .

[21]  Athanassios Tzempelikos,et al.  The impact of venetian blind geometry and tilt angle on view, direct light transmission and interior illuminance , 2008 .

[22]  Christoph F. Reinhart,et al.  Monitoring manual control of electric lighting and blinds , 2003 .

[23]  Sangwon Suh,et al.  Functions, commodities and environmental impacts in an ecological–economic model , 2004 .

[24]  Lisa Guan,et al.  Cross-correlations between weather variables in Australia , 2007 .

[25]  G. R. Newsham Manual Control of Window Blinds and Electric Lighting: Implications for Comfort and Energy Consumption , 1994 .

[26]  David Sliney,et al.  Sensitivity of the Human Circadian System to Short-Wavelength (420-nm) Light , 2008, Journal of biological rhythms.

[27]  Robert H. Crawford,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment in the Built Environment , 2011 .

[28]  J. Michalsky,et al.  Modeling daylight availability and irradiance components from direct and global irradiance , 1990 .

[29]  David Lehrer,et al.  High-performance facades design strategies and applications in North America and Northern Europe , 2011 .

[30]  Tanya Heasman Ba,et al.  Daylight use in open-plan offices: The opportunities and the fantasies , 1994 .