The Role of Awareness in Semantic and Syntactic Processing: An ERP Attentional Blink Study

An important question in the study of language is to what degree semantic and syntactic processes are automatic or controlled. This study employed an attentional blink (AB) paradigm to manipulate awareness in the processing of target words in order to assess automaticity in semantic and syntactic processing. In the semantic block, targets occurring both within and outside the AB period elicited an N400. However, N400 amplitude was significantly reduced during the AB period, and missed targets did not elicit an N400. In the syntactic block, ERPs to targets occurring outside the AB period revealed a late negative syntactic incongruency effect, whereas ERPs to targets occurring within the AB period showed no effect of incongruency. The semantic results support the argument that the N400 primarily indexes a controlled, postlexical process. Syntactic findings suggest that the ERP response to some syntactic violations depends on awareness and availability of attentional resources.

[1]  J. A. Shafer,et al.  Understanding aphasia. , 1954, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.

[2]  M. Potter,et al.  A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  M. Garrett,et al.  Syntactically Based Sentence Processing Classes: Evidence from Event-Related Brain Potentials , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[4]  A. Friederici,et al.  Electrophysiological Evidence for Two Steps in Syntactic Analysis: Early Automatic and Late Controlled Processes , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[5]  A. Friederici,et al.  Event-related brain potentials during natural speech processing: effects of semantic, morphological and syntactic violations. , 1993, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[6]  Manuel Carreiras,et al.  Grammatical Gender and Number Agreement in Spanish: An ERP Comparison , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[7]  K. Albus,et al.  Structural and Functional Organization of the Neocortex , 1994 .

[8]  M. Garrett,et al.  Lexical decision in sentences: Effects of syntactic structure , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[9]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The role of syntactic context in word recognition , 1981, Memory & cognition.

[10]  E. Vogel,et al.  Electrophysiological Evidence for a Postperceptual Locus of Suppression during the Attentional Blink Time-based Attention and the Attentional Blink , 1998 .

[11]  K L Shapiro,et al.  Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: an attentional blink? . , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[13]  François Vachon,et al.  On the Automaticity of Semantic Processing during Task Switching , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[14]  A. Friederici.  The Time Course of Syntactic Activation During Language Processing: A Model Based on Neuropsychological and Neurophysiological Data , 1995, Brain and Language.

[15]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: I , 1977 .

[16]  Helen J. Neville,et al.  An ERP study of syntactic processing in English and nonsense sentences , 2007, Brain Research.

[17]  D. Shankweiler,et al.  An Event-related Neuroimaging Study Distinguishing Form and Content in Sentence Processing , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[18]  E. Vogel,et al.  Word meanings can be accessed but not reported during the attentional blink , 1996, Nature.

[19]  J. Lupiáñez,et al.  High density ERP indices of conscious and unconscious semantic priming. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[20]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Basic processes in reading : visual word recognition , 1993 .

[21]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Pre- and postlexical loci of contextual effects on word recognition , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[22]  C. C. Wood,et al.  Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: an ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[23]  Hans-Jochen Heinze,et al.  Dissociation of Brain Activity Related to Syntactic and Semantic Aspects of Language , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[24]  J. Sereno.  Graphemic, associative, and syntactic priming effects at a brief stimulus onset asynchrony in lexical decision and naming , 1991 .

[25]  A. Friederici.  Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[26]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.

[27]  D. Broadbent,et al.  From detection to identification: Response to multiple targets in rapid serial visual presentation , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[28]  Barry Giesbrecht,et al.  Electrophysiological Evidence for Both Perceptual and Postperceptual Selection during the Attentional Blink , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[29]  V. Lollo,et al.  Beyond the attentional blink: visual masking by object substitution. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  M. Kutas,et al.  Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association , 1984, Nature.

[31]  L. Postman,et al.  Norms of word association , 1970 .

[32]  I Rosén,et al.  Semantic processing without conscious identification: evidence from event-related potentials. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[33]  Laura Batterink,et al.  Dissociable mechanisms supporting awareness: the P300 and gamma in a linguistic attentional blink task. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[34]  Marvin M Chun,et al.  Delayed attentional engagement in the attentional blink. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[35]  Enriqueta Canseco-Gonzalez.  Using the Recording of Event-Related Brain Potentials in the Study of Sentence Processing , 2000 .

[36]  Giordana Grossi.  Relatedness proportion effects on masked associative priming: an ERP study. , 2006, Psychophysiology.

[37]  P. Holcomb,et al.  Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly , 1992 .

[38]  R. Dell’Acqua,et al.  The Demonstration of Short-Term Consolidation , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[39]  H. Neville,et al.  Natural speech processing: An analysis using event-related brain potentials , 1991, Psychobiology.

[40]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  The syntactic positive shift (sps) as an erp measure of syntactic processing , 1993 .

[41]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. , 1977 .

[42]  M. Kutas,et al.  Event-related potential asymmetries during the reading of sentences. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[43]  D Y von Cramon,et al.  Segregating semantic and syntactic aspects of processing in the human brain: an fMRI investigation of different word types. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[44]  D. Deacon,et al.  Event-related potential indices of semantic priming using masked and unmasked words: evidence that the N400 does not reflect a post-lexical process. , 2000, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[45]  Helen J. Neville,et al.  Implicit and Explicit Mechanisms of Word Learning in a Narrative Context: An Event-related Potential Study , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[46]  E Hennighausen,et al.  Missed prime words within the attentional blink evoke an N400 semantic priming effect. , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[47]  M. Kiefer.  The N400 is modulated by unconsciously perceived masked words: further evidence for an automatic spreading activation account of N400 priming effects. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[48]  Thomas F. Mnte,et al.  Brain Activity Associated with Syntactic Incongruencies in Words and Pseudo-Words , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[49]  M. Kutas,et al.  Semantic and repetition priming within the attentional blink: An event-related brain potential (ERP) investigation study , 2007, Biological Psychology.

[50]  H. Neville,et al.  An Event-Related fMRI Study of Syntactic and Semantic Violations , 2001, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[51]  K. Shapiro,et al.  The attentional blink , 1997, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[52]  J. H. Neely.  Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. , 1991 .

[53]  J. Grainger,et al.  The effects of prime visibility on ERP measures of masked priming. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[54]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  The Processing Nature of the N400: Evidence from Masked Priming , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.