Propositional Attitudes and Causation

Predicting and explaining the behavior of others in terms of mental states is indispensable for everyday life. It will be equally important for artificial agents. We present an inference system for representing and reasoning about mental states, and use it to provide a formal analysis of the false-belief task. The system allows for the representation of information about events, causation, and perceptual, doxastic, and epistemic states (vision, belief, and knowledge), incorporating ideas from the event calculus and multi-agent epistemic logic. Unlike previous AI formalisms, our focus here is on mechanized proofs and proof programmability, not on metamathematical results. Reasoning is performed via relatively cognitively plausible inference rules, and a degree of automation is achieved by general-purpose inference methods and by a syntactic embedding of the system in first-order logic.

[1]  Ronald Fagin,et al.  Reasoning about knowledge , 1995 .

[2]  Hector J. Levesque,et al.  Intention is Choice with Commitment , 1990, Artif. Intell..

[3]  Teodoro Arvizo A Virtual Machine for a Type-omega Denotational Proof Language , 2002 .

[4]  H. Wimmer,et al.  Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception , 1983, Cognition.

[5]  Frank Wolter,et al.  Common knowledge and quantification , 2002 .

[6]  D. Dennett Conditions of Personhood , 1988 .

[7]  John Rushby,et al.  The PVS Specification Language , 1993 .

[8]  Andrei Voronkov,et al.  The anatomy of vampire , 1995, Journal of Automated Reasoning.

[9]  Selmer Bringsjord,et al.  Metareasoning for Multi-agent Epistemic Logics , 2004, CLIMA.

[10]  Paul Bello,et al.  Attention and Association Explain the Emergence of Reasoning About False Beliefs in Young Children , 2007 .

[11]  Noah D. Goodman,et al.  Intuitive Theories of Mind: A Rational Approach to False Belief , 2005 .

[12]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  Syntactical Treatments of Propositional Attitudes , 1998, Artif. Intell..

[13]  Frank Wolter,et al.  First Order Common Knowledge Logics , 2000, Stud Logica.

[14]  Richmond H. Thomason,et al.  A note on syntactical treatments of modality , 1980, Synthese.

[15]  Christoph Weidenbach,et al.  Combining Superposition, Sorts and Splitting , 2001, Handbook of Automated Reasoning.

[16]  Anand S. Rao,et al.  Modeling Rational Agents within a BDI-Architecture , 1997, KR.

[17]  Hector J. Levesque,et al.  The consistency of syntactical treatments of knowledge 1 (How to compile quantificational modal logics into classical FOL) , 1988, Comput. Intell..

[18]  William J. Rapaport Review: Jim des Rivieres, Hector J. Levesque, The Consistency of Syntactical Treatments of Knowledge , 1988 .

[19]  M. Davies,et al.  Folk Psychology: The Theory of Mind Debate , 1995 .

[20]  Hector J. Levesque,et al.  The cognitive agents specification language and verification environment for multiagent systems , 2002, AAMAS '02.

[21]  C. Anthony Anderson,et al.  The Paradox of the Knower , 1983 .