Strategy after modernism: recovering practice

This article identifies an opportunity for European researchers to develop a more practice-sensitive research programme for strategy ‘after modernism’. Strategy's intellectual lock-in on modernist detachment and economic theory can now be relaxed. Strategy can draw also on the rich resources of sociology to engage more directly with strategy as a social practice. This article outlines elements of a double agenda for strategy research after modernism: first, a sociological agenda concerned with understanding strategy's elites, its skills and its technologies, and their implications for society as a whole; second, a managerial agenda, turning this sociological understanding to practical advantage in terms of how managers become strategists, how strategy skills are acquired and how strategy technologies can be better designed and used. The article considers implications for research methods and the Mintzbergian tradition in strategy.

[1]  D. Tranfield,et al.  The Nature, Social Organization and Promotion of Management Research: Towards Policy , 1998 .

[2]  Julia Balogun,et al.  Three Responses to the Methodological Challenges of Studying Strategizing , 2003 .

[3]  D. Samra-Fredericks.  Strategizing as Lived Experience and Strategists' Everyday Efforts to Shape Strategic Direction , 2003 .

[4]  F. Westley.  Middle managers and strategy: Microdynamics of inclusion , 1990 .

[5]  Richard C. Hoffman,et al.  The Relevance of Strategy Research: Practitioner and Academic Viewpoints* , 1995 .

[6]  Anne Sigismund Huff,et al.  1999 Presidential Address: Changes in Organizational Knowledge Production , 2000 .

[7]  D. Barry,et al.  Strategy Retold: Toward a Narrative View of Strategic Discourse , 1997 .

[8]  Steven E. Phelan,et al.  THE FIRST TWENTY YEARS OF THE STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL: 1980-1999 , 1999 .

[9]  Richard J. Arend.  Revisiting the logical and research considerations of competitive advantage , 2003 .

[10]  L. Melin,et al.  Micro Strategy and Strategizing: Towards an Activity‐Based View , 2003 .

[11]  Jeanne Liedtka,et al.  Teaching Strategy as Design: A Report from the Field , 1998 .

[12]  Matthias Kipping,et al.  American Management Consulting Companies in Western Europe, 1920 to 1990: Products, Reputation, and Relationships , 1999, Business History Review.

[13]  R. Mir,et al.  Strategic management and the philosophy of science: the case for a constructivist methodology , 2000 .

[14]  P. Jarzabkowski.  Strategy as Practice: Recursiveness, Adaptation, and Practices-in-Use , 2004 .

[15]  G. Burrell,et al.  Modernism, Postmodernism and Organizational Analysis: An Introduction , 1988 .

[16]  M. Porter.  The Contributions of Industrial Organization To Strategic Management , 1981 .

[17]  Daniel E. Vetter,et al.  Replication in strategic management: scientific testing for validity, generalizability, and usefulness , 1998 .

[18]  P. Regnér.  Strategy Creation in the Periphery: Inductive Versus Deductive Strategy Making , 2003 .

[19]  George Wright,et al.  Confronting Strategic Inertia in a Top Management Team: Learning from Failure , 2002 .

[20]  Michel Berry.  Research and the Practice of Management: A French View , 1995 .

[21]  R. Whittington.  The Work of Strategizing and Organizing: For a Practice Perspective , 2003 .

[22]  David Knights,et al.  Corporate Strategy, Organizations, and Subjectivity: A Critique , 1991 .

[23]  J. Liedtka.  Strategic thinking: Can it be taught? , 1998 .

[24]  Thomas C. Powell,et al.  The Philosophy of Strategy , 2002 .

[25]  S. Cummings,et al.  Marginalization and Recovery: The Emergence of Aristotelian Themes in Organization Studies , 1997 .

[26]  A. Pettigrew.  Management Research After Modernism , 2001 .

[27]  Bente R. Løwendahl,et al.  Challenges to existing strategy theory in a postindustrial society , 1998 .

[28]  J. Hendry.  Strategic Decision Mking, Discourse, And Strategy As Social Practice , 2000 .

[29]  Frank Blackler,et al.  Organizing Processes in Complex Activity Networks , 2000 .

[30]  W. Orlikowski.  Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000 .

[31]  P. Jarzabkowski,et al.  Taking Strategy Seriously , 2003 .

[32]  P. Ghemawat.  Competition and Business Strategy in Historical Perspective , 2000, Business History Review.

[33]  Robert Cheng Huat Chia.  From Modern to Postmodern Organizational Analysis , 1995 .

[34]  Darrell Rigby,et al.  Management Tools and Techniques: A Survey , 2001 .

[35]  Jean-Claude Thoenig,et al.  Organizational Theory at the Crossroads: Some Reflections on European and United States Approaches to Organizational Research , 1995 .

[36]  Andrew Pettigrew,et al.  On studying managerial elites , 1992 .