Optimal k-space sampling in MRSI for images with a limited region of support

Magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging requires a great deal of time to gather the data necessary to achieve satisfactory resolution. When the image has a limited region of support (ROS), it is possible to reconstruct the image from a subset of k-space samples. Therefore, the authors desire to choose the best possible combination of a small number of k-space samples to guarantee the quality of the reconstructed image. Sequential forward selection (SFS) is appealing as an optimization method because the previously selected sample can be observed while the next sample is selected. However, when the number of selected k-space samples is less than the number of unknowns at the beginning of the selection process, the optimality criterion is undefined and the resulting SFS algorithm cannot be used. Here, the authors present a modified form of the criterion that overcomes this problem and develop an SFS algorithm for the new criterion. Then the authors develop an efficient computational strategy for this algorithm as well as for the standard SFS algorithm. The combined algorithm efficiently selects a reduced set of k-space samples from which the ROS can be reconstructed with minimal noise amplification.

[1]  D. Arnold,et al.  Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging and magnetic resonance imaging volumetry in the lateralization of temporal lobe epilepsy: A series of 100 patients , 1997, Annals of neurology.

[2]  Larry P. Heck,et al.  Selection of observations in signal reconstruction , 1995, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[3]  Markus von Kienlin,et al.  Spectral localization with optimal pointspread function , 1991 .

[4]  Albert Macovski,et al.  Alternative k-space sampling distributions for MR spectroscopic imaging , 1994, Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Image Processing.

[5]  Ernest M. Stokely,et al.  Functional image reconstruction enhancement for MR spectroscopic and nuclear medicine images , 1992, Medical Imaging.

[6]  R. Kuzniecky,et al.  Relative utility of 1H spectroscopic imaging and hippocampal volumetry in the lateralization of mesial temporal lobe epilepsy , 1998, Neurology.

[7]  S. Nelson,et al.  Serial evaluation of patients with brain tumors using volume MRI and 3D 1H MRSI , 1999, NMR in biomedicine.

[8]  David N. Levin,et al.  A new class of sampling theorems for Fourier imaging of multiple regions , 1998, Proceedings 1998 International Conference on Image Processing. ICIP98 (Cat. No.98CB36269).

[9]  Z P Liang,et al.  A generalized series approach to MR spectroscopic imaging. , 1991, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[10]  P C Lauterbur,et al.  SLIM: Spectral localization by imaging , 1988, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  Robert J. Marks,et al.  Advanced topics in Shannon sampling and interpolation theory , 1993 .

[12]  Stanley J. Reeves,et al.  Sequential algorithms for observation selection , 1999, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[13]  Yoram Bresler,et al.  Further results on spectrum blind sampling of 2D signals , 1998, Proceedings 1998 International Conference on Image Processing. ICIP98 (Cat. No.98CB36269).

[14]  Reginald L. Lagendijk,et al.  On increasing the convergence rate of regularized iterative image restoration algorithms , 1987, ICASSP '87. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[15]  R. Kuzniecky,et al.  Lateralization of human temporal lobe epilepsy by 31P NMR spectroscopic imaging at 4.1 T , 1998, Neurology.

[16]  G B Matson,et al.  Lateralization of human focal epilepsy by 31P magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging , 1992, Neurology.

[17]  S. Reeves Selection of K‐space samples in localized MR spectroscopy of arbitrary volumes of interest , 1995, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[18]  Yue Cao,et al.  Using an image database to constrain the acquisition and reconstruction of MR images of the human head , 1995, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[19]  D. Levin,et al.  Multiple region MRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.