Base-rate effects in category learning: a comparison of parallel network and memory storage-retrieval models.

Exemplar-memory and adaptive network models were compared in application to category learning data, with special attention to base rate effects on learning and transfer performance. Subjects classified symptom charts of hypothetical patients into disease categories, with informative feedback on learning trials and with the feedback either given or withheld on test trials that followed each fourth of the learning series. The network model proved notably accurate and uniformly superior to the exemplar model in accounting for the detailed course of learning; both the parallel, interactive aspect of the network model and its particular learning algorithm contribute to this superiority. During learning, subjects' performance reflected both category base rates and feature (symptom) probabilities in a nearly optimal manner, a result predicted by both models, though more accurately by the network model. However, under some test conditions, the data showed substantial base-rate neglect, in agreement with Gluck and Bower (1988b).

[1]  M. Stone,et al.  Studies in mathematical learning theory. , 1960 .

[2]  B. J. Winer.  Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 1992 .

[3]  William K. Estes,et al.  Research and Theory on the Learning of Probabilities , 1972 .

[4]  A. Tversky,et al.  On the psychology of prediction , 1973 .

[5]  Douglas L. Medin,et al.  Context theory of classification learning. , 1978 .

[6]  William Kaye Estes,et al.  Models of Learning, Memory, and Choice: Selected Papers , 1982 .

[7]  R. Nosofsky.  American Psychological Association, Inc. Choice, Similarity, and the Context Theory of Classification , 2022 .

[8]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Induction of category distributions: a framework for classification learning. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  D L Medin,et al.  Evaluation of exemplar-based generalization and the abstraction of categorical information. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[10]  W. Estes.  Memory storage and retrieval processes in category learning. , 1986 .

[11]  R. Nosofsky.  Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[12]  W. Estes.  Array models for category learning , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[13]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition : Psychological and Biological Models , 1986 .

[14]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .

[15]  R. Nosofsky.  Attention and learning processes in the identification and categorization of integral stimuli. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[16]  W. Estes,et al.  Toward a framework for combining connectionist and symbol-processing models☆ , 1988 .

[17]  D. Medin,et al.  Problem structure and the use of base-rate information from experience. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[18]  G. Bower,et al.  Evaluating an adaptive network model of human learning , 1988 .

[19]  G. Bower,et al.  From conditioning to category learning: an adaptive network model. , 1988 .