Beyond Operational Energy Efficiency: A Balanced Sustainability Index from a Life Cycle Consideration

Most deep energy renovation projects focus only on an operating energy reduction and disregard the added embodied energy derived from adding insulation, window/door replacement, and mechanical system replacement or upgrades. It is important to study and address the balance and trade-offs between reduced operating energy and added embodied energy from a whole life cycle perspective to reduce the overall building carbon footprint. However, the added embodied energy and related environmental impact have not been studied extensively. In response to this need, this paper proposes a holistic sustainability index that balances the trade-off between reduced operating energy and added embodied energy. Eight case projects are used to validate the proposed method and calculation. The findings demonstrate that using a balanced sustainability index can reveal results different from a conventional operating energy-centric approach: (a) operating energy savings can be offset by the embodied energy gain, (b) the operating energy savings do not always result in a life cycle emissions reduction, and (c) the sustainability index can vary depending on the priorities the decision makers give to operating carbon, embodied carbon, and operating cost. Overall, the proposed sustainability score can provide us with a more comprehensive understanding of how sustainable the renovation works are from a life cycle carbon emissions perspective, providing a more robust estimation of global warming potential related to building renovation.

[1]  Marita Wallhagen,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of Building Materials for a Single-family House in Sweden , 2019, Energy Procedia.

[2]  Jamie Goggins,et al.  Sustainable energy efficiency retrofits as residenial buildings move towards nearly zero energy building (NZEB) standards , 2020 .

[3]  L. C. Felius,et al.  Retrofitting towards energy-efficient homes in European cold climates: a review , 2020 .

[4]  Juha Jokisalo,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of energy performance renovation measures in Finnish brick apartment buildings , 2017 .

[5]  Robert H. Crawford,et al.  A comprehensive framework for assessing the life-cycle energy of building construction assemblies , 2010 .

[6]  Ambrose Dodoo,et al.  Effect of thermal mass on life cycle primary energy balances of a concrete- and a wood-frame building , 2012 .

[7]  R. Lamberts,et al.  Sustainable energy performance in Brazilian social housing: A proposal for a Sustainability Index in the energy life cycle considering climate change , 2021, Energy and Buildings.

[8]  Ming Hu,et al.  Balance between energy conservation and environmental impact: Life-cycle energy analysis and life-cycle environmental impact analysis , 2017 .

[9]  Maurizio Cellura,et al.  Energy life-cycle approach in Net zero energy buildings balance: Operation and embodied energy of an Italian case study , 2014 .

[10]  Wei Yan,et al.  Evaluating the impact of operating energy reduction measures on embodied energy , 2020 .

[11]  Mohammad Yusri Hassan,et al.  Energy efficiency index as an indicator for measuring building energy performance: A review , 2015 .

[12]  David J. C. Constable,et al.  Cradle-to-gate life cycle inventory and assessment of pharmaceutical compounds , 2004 .

[13]  Evaluating energy efficiency potential in low-income households: A flexible and granular approach , 2019, Energy Policy.

[14]  Kristel de Myttenaere,et al.  A comprehensive assessment of the life cycle energy demand of passive houses , 2013 .

[15]  Víctor Martínez-Moll,et al.  An assessment of the relationship between embodied and thermal energy demands in dwellings in a Mediterranean climate , 2015 .

[16]  J. Jokisalo,et al.  Towards the EU emissions targets of 2050: optimal energy renovation measures of Finnish apartment buildings , 2019, International Journal of Sustainable Energy.