Part-Based and Configural Processing of Owner's Face in Dogs

Dogs exhibit characteristic looking patterns when looking at human faces but little is known about what the underlying cognitive mechanisms are and how much these are influenced by individual experience. In Experiment 1, seven dogs were trained in a simultaneous discrimination procedure to assess whether they could discriminate a) the owner's face parts (eyes, nose or mouth) presented in isolation and b) whole faces where the same parts were covered. Dogs discriminated all the three parts of the owner's face presented in isolation, but needed fewer sessions to reach the learning criterion for the eyes than for both nose and mouth. Moreover, covering the eyes region significantly disrupted face discriminability compared to the whole face condition while such difference was not found when the nose or mouth was hidden. In Experiment 2, dogs were presented with manipulated images of the owner's face (inverted, blurred, scrambled, grey-scale) to test the relative contribution of part-based and configural processing in the discrimination of human faces. Furthermore, by comparing the dogs enrolled in the previous experiment and seven ‘naïve’ dogs we examined if the relative contribution of part-based and configural processing was affected by dogs' experience with the face stimuli. Naïve dogs discriminated the owner only when configural information was provided, whereas expert dogs could discriminate the owner also when part-based processing was necessary. The present study provides the first evidence that dogs can discriminate isolated internal features of a human face and corroborate previous reports of salience of the eyes region for human face processing. Although the reliance on part-perception may be increased by specific experience, our findings suggest that human face discrimination by dogs relies mainly on configural rather than on part-based elaboration.

[1]  J. Brigham,et al.  Accuracy of eyewitness identification in a field setting. , 1982 .

[2]  I. Craw,et al.  Spatial Content and Spatial Quantisation Effects in Face Recognition , 1994, Perception.

[3]  L. Parr,et al.  The evolution of face processing in primates , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  J. Shepherd Studies of cue saliency , 1981 .

[5]  M. Nagasawa,et al.  Dogs can discriminate human smiling faces from blank expressions , 2011, Animal Cognition.

[6]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Expertise and configural coding in face recognition. , 1989, British journal of psychology.

[7]  Heini Törnqvist,et al.  Dogs do look at images: eye tracking in canine cognition research , 2012, Animal Cognition.

[8]  Á. Miklósi,et al.  Dogs respond appropriately to cues of humans’ attentional focus , 2004, Behavioural Processes.

[9]  Shigeru Watanabe Discrimination of cartoons and photographs in pigeons: effects of scrambling of elements , 2001, Behavioural Processes.

[10]  Ludwig Huber,et al.  Obey or not obey? Dogs (Canis familiaris) behave differently in response to attentional states of their owners. , 2006, Journal of comparative psychology.

[11]  Keating Cf,et al.  Monkeys and mug shots: cues used by rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) to recognize a human face , 1993 .

[12]  Susanne Huber,et al.  Gaze behavior in analytical and holistic face processing , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[13]  Daniel Mills,et al.  Discrimination of human and dog faces and inversion responses in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) , 2010, Animal Cognition.

[14]  O. Pascalis,et al.  Recognition memory in 3- to 4-day-old human neonates. , 1994, Neuroreport.

[15]  H. Ellis,et al.  Perceiving and remembering faces , 1983 .

[16]  Á. Miklósi,et al.  A Simple Reason for a Big Difference Wolves Do Not Look Back at Humans, but Dogs Do , 2003, Current Biology.

[17]  G. J. Walker-Smith,et al.  The effects of delay and exposure duration in a face recognition task , 1978 .

[18]  C. Nelson,et al.  Handbook of Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience , 2001 .

[19]  A. G. Goldstein Learning of inverted and normally oriented faces in children and adults , 1965 .

[20]  Irene Leo,et al.  Newborns' face recognition: role of inner and outer facial features. , 2006, Child development.

[21]  M. Farah,et al.  Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[22]  O. Pascalis,et al.  Is Face Processing Species-Specific During the First Year of Life? , 2002, Science.

[23]  Ludwig Huber,et al.  Discrimination of familiar human faces in dogs (Canis familiaris) , 2013, Learning and motivation.

[24]  C. Keating,et al.  Monkeys and mug shots: cues used by rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) to recognize a human face. , 1993, Journal of comparative psychology.

[25]  J. Brigham,et al.  Accuracy of Eyewitness Identifications in a Field Setting , 1982 .

[26]  Paul D. Allison,et al.  Logistic Regression Using the SAS System : Theory and Application , 1999 .

[27]  L. Parr,et al.  Discrimination of faces and houses by rhesus monkeys: the role of stimulus expertise and rotation angle , 2008, Animal Cognition.

[28]  Peter Hills,et al.  Removing the own-race bias in face recognition by attentional shift using fixation crosses to diagnostic features: An eye-tracking study , 2013 .

[29]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  Heritability of the Specific Cognitive Ability of Face Perception , 2010, Current Biology.

[30]  J. Barton,et al.  The effects of face inversion on the perception of long-range and local spatial relations in eye and mouth configuration. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  Michael B. Lewis,et al.  Reducing the own-race bias in face recognition by attentional shift using fixation crosses preceding the lower half of a face , 2011 .

[32]  Christian A. Meissner,et al.  Social and Cognitive Factors Affecting the Own-Race Bias in Whites , 2000 .

[33]  Kevin M. McConkey,et al.  Cognition in individual and social contexts , 1989 .

[34]  Mary A. Peterson,et al.  Multiple perceptual strategies used by macaque monkeys for face recognition , 2008, Animal Cognition.

[35]  Christoph D. Dahl,et al.  Humans and Macaques Employ Similar Face-Processing Strategies , 2009, Current Biology.

[36]  Daniel Mills,et al.  Left gaze bias in humans, rhesus monkeys and domestic dogs , 2009, Animal Cognition.

[37]  I. Gauthier,et al.  How does the brain process upright and inverted faces? , 2002, Behavioral and cognitive neuroscience reviews.

[38]  J. Sergent An investigation into component and configural processes underlying face perception. , 1984, British journal of psychology.

[39]  D. K. Candland,et al.  Baboon (Papio hamadryas) visual preferences for regions of the face. , 1987, Journal of comparative psychology.

[40]  F. Simion,et al.  Newborns’ face recognition over changes in viewpoint , 2008, Cognition.

[41]  P. Carnier,et al.  Hierarchical stimulus processing by dogs (Canis familiaris) , 2013, Animal Cognition.

[42]  Kazunori Okada,et al.  Human and chimpanzee face recognition in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): role of exposure and impact on categorical perception. , 2007, Behavioral neuroscience.

[43]  L. Mounier,et al.  Visual discrimination of species in dogs (Canis familiaris) , 2013, Animal Cognition.

[44]  J. Winslow,et al.  Recognizing facial cues: individual discrimination by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). , 2000, Journal of comparative psychology.

[45]  Ludwig Huber,et al.  Representational insight in pigeons: comparing subjects with and without real-life experience , 2010, Animal Cognition.

[46]  G. Yovel,et al.  Why does picture-plane inversion sometimes dissociate perception of features and spacing in faces, and sometimes not? Toward a new theory of holistic processing , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[47]  Satoshi Hirata,et al.  Facial perception of conspecifics: chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) preferentially attend to proper orientation and open eyes , 2010, Animal Cognition.

[48]  L. Maloney,et al.  Where are kin recognition signals in the human face? , 2006, Journal of vision.

[49]  V Bruce,et al.  Feature Saliency in Judging the Sex and Familiarity of Faces , 1988, Perception.

[50]  O. Pascalis,et al.  Development of the other-race effect during infancy: evidence toward universality? , 2009, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[51]  Paolo Mongillo,et al.  Selective attention to humans in companion dogs, Canis familiaris , 2010, Animal Behaviour.

[52]  C. Krause,et al.  How dogs scan familiar and inverted faces: an eye movement study , 2013, Animal Cognition.

[53]  J. Neiworth,et al.  Face processing in humans and new world monkeys: the influence of experiential and ecological factors , 2007, Animal Cognition.

[54]  L. Parr,et al.  Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) lack expertise in face processing. , 2008, Journal of comparative psychology.

[55]  J. Fagot,et al.  Perception of pictorial human faces by baboons: Effects of stimulus orientation on discrimination performance , 2001 .

[56]  I. Adachi,et al.  Dogs recall their owner's face upon hearing the owner's voice , 2006, Animal Cognition.

[57]  H. Ellis,et al.  Cue Saliency in Faces as Assessed by the ‘Photofit’ Technique , 1977, Perception.

[58]  R. Yin Looking at Upside-down Faces , 1969 .

[59]  L. Parr,et al.  Why Faces May Be Special: Evidence of the Inversion Effect in Chimpanzees , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[60]  L. Huber,et al.  Visual categorization of natural stimuli by domestic dogs , 2008, Animal Cognition.

[61]  A. Young,et al.  Configurational Information in Face Perception , 1987, Perception.

[62]  Kathy Pezdek,et al.  Children's face recognition memory: more evidence for the cross-race effect. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[63]  O. Pascalis,et al.  Face recognition in primates: a cross-species study , 1998, Behavioural Processes.

[64]  Ludwig Huber,et al.  The role of item- and category-specific information in the discrimination of people versus nonpeople images by pigeons , 2001 .

[65]  S. McKelvie,et al.  The Role of Eyes and Mouth in the Memory of a Face. , 1976 .

[66]  John Cerella,et al.  The pigeon's analysis of pictures , 1980, Pattern Recognit..

[67]  G. Davies,et al.  Face recall: an examination of some factors limiting composite production accuracy. , 1982, The Journal of applied psychology.

[68]  S. Carey,et al.  Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[69]  Masako Jitsumori,et al.  Pigeon’s recognition of cartoons: effects of fragmentation, scrambling, and deletion of elements , 2004, Behavioural Processes.

[70]  Hadyn D. Ellis Face recall: A psychological perspective. , 1986 .

[71]  L. Parr,et al.  Three studies on configural face processing by chimpanzees , 2006, Brain and Cognition.

[72]  Paul Miller,et al.  Verification of face identities from images captured on video. , 1999 .

[73]  Sarah E. MacPherson,et al.  Familiar Other-Race Faces Show Normal Holistic Processing and are Robust to Perceptual Stress , 2007, Perception.

[74]  Vicki Bruce,et al.  The relative importance of external and internal features of facial composites. , 2007, British journal of psychology.

[75]  Kun Guo,et al.  Human Spontaneous Gaze Patterns in Viewing of Faces of Different Species , 2010, Perception.

[76]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) are sensitive to the attentional state of humans. , 2003, Journal of comparative psychology.

[77]  Peter J. Hills,et al.  Short Article: Reducing the Own-Race Bias in Face Recognition by Shifting Attention , 2006 .

[78]  Roberto Cabeza,et al.  Features are Also Important: Contributions of Featural and Configural Processing to Face Recognition , 2000, Psychological science.

[79]  J. Schooler,et al.  Verbal vulnerability of perceptual expertise. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[80]  Chiara Turati,et al.  Why Faces Are Not Special to Newborns , 2004 .

[81]  K. Kendrick,et al.  Human face recognition in sheep: lack of configurational coding and right hemisphere advantage , 2001, Behavioural Processes.