Protecting old fish through spatial management: is there a benefit for sustainable exploitation?

Summary 1. Spatially defined restrictions on fishing activity are considered to be important for biodiversity conservation in marine ecosystems. However, it is uncertain whether such restrictions also benefit wider populations of exploited fish species, in terms of a reduced risk of overexploitation. Since fishing leads to contraction of the age structure, one potential benefit of protection is recovery of the highly fecund older age classes, potentially leading to higher recruitment levels. This investigation explores the benefits of protecting older fish and how spatial management can be used to adjust the age structure and improve the sustainability of the catch (productivity). 2. We use a non-spatial equilibrium model accounting for biomass growth, mortality and recruitment to describe the relationship between mean age of the population and productivity for the South African deepwater hake Merluccius paradoxus trawl fishery. Our results indicate that management measures capable of increasing the mean age at which fish are caught may be of benefit. Furthermore, although the contribution of older fish to recruitment is important, the biomass growth of individuals before they are caught is responsible for the most significant productivity benefit of an older population age structure. 3. Older M. paradoxus are found in deeper water, so that distinct age classes can be defined spatially using empirical data. We describe a non-equilibirum model to examine spatial management alternatives for adjusting the age structure by targetting these different age classes. We investigate the benefits of protecting either older or younger fish, with results suggesting that it is more important to limit fishing on the younger (shallow) sections of the population if productivity benefits are to be realized. 4.Synthesis and applications. We conclude that the age structure of a population can be modified through spatially managed targeting of different age classes, and that, contrary to previous assumptions for M. paradoxus, protecting older fish has a negative consequence for the age structure of the resource. Instead, younger sections of the population should be protected through limitations on fishing in shallower waters, if older age classes are to recover.

[1]  C. Walters,et al.  An equilibrium model for predicting the efficacy of marine protected areas in coastal environments , 2007 .

[2]  A. E. Punt,et al.  The effects of future consumption by the Cape fur seal on catches and catch rates of the Cape hakes. 1. Feeding and diet of the Cape hakes Merluccius capensis and M. paradoxus , 1995 .

[3]  Tom Polacheck,et al.  YEAR AROUND CLOSED AREAS AS A MANAGEMENT TOOL , 1990 .

[4]  G. Marteinsdóttir,et al.  Maternal influence on the size and viability of Iceland cod Gadus morhua eggs and larvae , 1998 .

[5]  David A. Fournier,et al.  A General Theory for Analyzing Catch at Age Data , 1982 .

[6]  M. Love,et al.  Fisheries Sustainability via Protection of Age Structure and Spatial Distribution of Fish Populations , 2004 .

[7]  T. McClanahan,et al.  THE EFFECT OF MARINE RESERVES AND HABITAT ON POPULATIONS OF EAST AFRICAN CORAL REEF FISHES , 2001 .

[8]  George Sugihara,et al.  Why fishing magnifies fluctuations in fish abundance , 2008, Nature.

[9]  Alistair J. Hobday,et al.  Age-dependent distribution of juvenile southern bluefin tuna (Thunnus maccoyii) on the continental shelf off southwest Australia determined by acoustic monitoring , 2010 .

[10]  J. Castilla,et al.  The management of fisheries and marine ecosystems , 1997 .

[11]  Colin W. Clark,et al.  Marine Reserves and the Precautionary Management of Fisheries , 1996 .

[12]  Simon Jennings,et al.  Impact of a large-scale area closure on patterns of fishing disturbance and the consequences for benthic communities , 2003 .

[13]  Mangel No‐take areas for sustainability of harvested species and a conservation invariant for marine reserves , 1998 .

[14]  J. G. Field,et al.  Exploring the BOFFFF hypothesis using a model of Southern African deepwater hake (Merluccius paradoxus) , 2008 .

[15]  P. R. Neal,et al.  Catch-Age Analysis with Auxiliary Information , 1985 .

[16]  Benjamin S. Halpern,et al.  THE IMPACT OF MARINE RESERVES: DO RESERVES WORK AND DOES RESERVE SIZE MATTER? , 2003 .

[17]  Russell B. Millar,et al.  Burdens of evidence and the benefits of marine reserves: putting Descartes before des horse? , 2003, Environmental Conservation.

[18]  U. Dieckmann,et al.  Adaptive changes in harvested populations: plasticity and evolution of age and size at maturation , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  Marc Mangel,et al.  IMPLEMENTING THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE IN FISHERIES MANAGEMENT THROUGH MARINE RESERVES , 1998 .

[20]  N. Polunin,et al.  Marine reserves: simple solutions to managing complex fisheries? , 1993 .

[21]  A. Aubone Loss of stability owing to a stable age structure skewed toward juveniles , 2004 .

[22]  Richard Law,et al.  Fisheries-induced evolution: present status and future directions , 2007 .

[23]  S. Walsh,et al.  Changes in the spatial structure of Grand Bank yellowtail flounder: testing MacCall's basin hypothesis , 2004 .

[24]  Rainer Froese,et al.  Size matters: How single-species management can contribute to ecosystem-based fisheries management , 2008 .

[25]  Benjamin S. Halpern,et al.  Marine reserves have rapid and lasting effects , 2002 .

[26]  Doug S Butterworth,et al.  A history of recent bases for management and the development of a species-combined Operational Management Procedure for the South African hake resource , 2008 .

[27]  A. Nissling,et al.  Maternal effects on egg size and egg buoyancy of Baltic cod, Gadus morhua: Implications for stock structure effects on recruitment , 2000 .

[28]  G. Begg,et al.  Spatial partitioning of relative fishing mortality and spawning stock biomass of Icelandic cod , 2003 .

[29]  Serge M. Garcia,et al.  When can marine reserves improve fisheries management , 2004 .

[30]  Alec D. MacCall,et al.  Dynamic Geography of Marine Fish Populations , 1990 .

[31]  James N. Ianelli,et al.  Bayesian stock assessment using catch-age data and the sampling - importance resampling algorithm , 1997 .

[32]  André E. Punt,et al.  Modelling the effects of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) on the southern rock lobster (Jasus edwardsii) fishery of Victoria, Australia , 2005 .

[33]  U. Dieckmann,et al.  Marine reserves and the evolutionary effects of fishing on size at maturation , 2010 .

[34]  L. Kaufman,et al.  Estimating the importance of maternal age, size, and spawning experience to recruitment of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) , 2009 .

[35]  J. G. Field,et al.  Indicators of change in the size structure of fish communities: A case study from the south coast of South Africa , 2008 .

[36]  Doug S Butterworth,et al.  Investigating the consequences of Marine Protected Areas for the South African deep-water hake (Merluccius paradoxus) resource , 2009 .

[37]  S. Sogard,et al.  MATERNAL AGE AS A DETERMINANT OF LARVAL GROWTH AND SURVIVAL IN A MARINE FISH, SEBASTES MELANOPS , 2004 .

[38]  Doug S Butterworth,et al.  Assessment of the South African hake resource taking its two-species nature into account , 2008 .

[39]  Richard D. Methot,et al.  Does MPA mean 'Major Problem for Assessments'? Considering the consequences of place-based management systems , 2006 .

[40]  K. Bjorndal,et al.  Historical Overfishing and the Recent Collapse of Coastal Ecosystems , 2001, Science.

[41]  P. Dayton,et al.  The importance in fishery management of leaving the big ones. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.