Nonlinear systems analysis of the hippocampal perforant path-dentate projection. I. Theoretical and interpretational considerations.

1. Nonlinear systems analytic procedures, based on an orthogonalized functional power series approach, were developed for study of the transformational properties of the hippocampal formation. As a testing stimulus, the procedures utilize a train of electrical impulses with randomly varying interimpulse intervals. The specific case was considered of applying such a stimulus to the perforant path, a major afferent to the hippocampal dentate gyrus that arises from the entorhinal cortex. Resulting field potentials evoked within the dentate gyrus are recorded to all impulses in the train. Computational algorithms based on cross-correlations determine the relationship between the interimpulse interval within the random train and amplitude of the evoked dentate potentials. The calculations, which reduce to averaging procedures, were derived for first- and second-order terms, or kernels, of the orthogonalized functional power series. 2. It is proposed that such an approach can be applied to a single component of the complex field potential evoked in the dentate gyrus. This component, the population spike, reflects the action potential discharge of dentate granule cells. Thus, a field potential component for which the underlying neuronal generator is well-known can be analyzed with respect to the transformational characteristics of the network of neurons that influence that generator. Other components of the complex field potential produced by other generators can be ignored. It is shown that this adaptation has the effect of greatly simplifying both the computation and presentation of kernels. 3. As a further consequence of this adaptation, the resulting first- and second-order kernels were shown to have specific interpretations. The first-order kernel represents the average response of the orthodromically driven granule cells to the set of stimuli comprising the random impulse train. The second-order kernel quantitatively characterizes the nonlinearity of the granule cell response, and may be interpreted as a generalized recovery function; i.e., the first input of any pair of stimuli in the train activates the newtork, and the second input tests the modulatory influence of the network excited by the initial input. 4. Most past investigations of nonlinearities of the perforant path-dentate projection have utilized pairs of stimulus impulses. We show here that, for a second-order system, the expected results from paired impulse experiments may be predicted from second-order kernels. Disagreement between the measured and predicted results reflects interactions of a higher order, and thus, greater system complexity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

[1]  N. Wiener,et al.  Nonlinear Problems in Random Theory , 1964 .

[2]  B. L. Ginsborg THE PHYSIOLOGY OF SYNAPSES , 1964 .

[3]  J. Eccles,et al.  LOCATION OF POSTSYNAPTIC INHIBITORY SYNAPSES ON HIPPOCAMPAL PYRAMIDS. , 1964, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  P. Andersen,et al.  Excitatory synapses on hippocampal apical dendrites activated by entorhinal stimulation. , 1966, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[5]  Nasser E. Nahi,et al.  Estimation Theory and Applications , 1969 .

[6]  A. Hjorth-Simonsen,et al.  Origin and termination of the hippocampal perforant path in the rat studied by silver impregnation , 1972, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[7]  Hisanao Ogura,et al.  Orthogonal functionals of the Poisson process , 1972, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[8]  K. Naka,et al.  Nonlinear analysis and synthesis of receptive-field responses in the catfish retina. 3. Two-input white-noise analysis. , 1973, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  T. Bliss,et al.  Long‐lasting potentiation of synaptic transmission in the dentate area of the anaesthetized rabbit following stimulation of the perforant path , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  T. Teyler,et al.  Monosynaptic habituation in the vertebrate forebrain: The dentate gyrus examined in vitro , 1976, Brain Research.

[11]  W. O. Friesen,et al.  The analysis of nonlinear synaptic transmission , 1977, The Journal of general physiology.

[12]  B. McNaughton,et al.  Physiological identification and analysis of dentate granule cell responses to stimulation of the medial and lateral perforant pathways in the rat , 1977, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[13]  R. Sclabassi,et al.  Complex-pattern evoked somatosensory responses in the study of multiple sclerosis , 1977, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[14]  W. Cowan,et al.  An autoradiographic study of the organization of intrahippocampal association pathways in the rat , 1978, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[15]  J. E. Vaughn,et al.  Immunocytochemical localization of glutamic acid decarboxylase in neuronal somata following colchicine inhibition of axonal transport , 1978, Brain Research.

[16]  R. M. Beckstead Afferent connections of the entorhinal area in the rat as demonstrated by retrograde cell-labeling with horseradish peroxidase , 1978, Brain Research.

[17]  F. Bloom,et al.  Opioid peptides may excite hippocampal pyramidal neurons by inhibiting adjacent inhibitory interneurons. , 1979, Science.

[18]  G. Buzsáki,et al.  Commissural projection to the dentate gyrus of the rat: evidence for feed-forward inhibition , 1981, Brain Research.

[19]  R. Nicoll,et al.  Feed‐forward dendritic inhibition in rat hippocampal pyramidal cells studied in vitro , 1982, The Journal of physiology.

[20]  T. H. Brown,et al.  Voltage-clamp analysis of mossy fiber synaptic input to hippocampal neurons. , 1983, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  R J Sclabassi,et al.  A non-linear analysis of afferent modulatory activity in the cat somatosensory system. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[22]  R. Bartesaghi,et al.  Hippocampal output to the subicular cortex: An electrophysiological study , 1986, Experimental Neurology.