Impact of impaired myocardial deformations on exercise tolerance and prognosis in patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis.

AIMS As assessed by tissue Doppler velocities, longitudinal contraction is commonly altered at an earlier stage than radial contraction in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). However, its relationship to exercise tolerance or to prognosis has not been clearly established. By using two-dimensional (2D) echocardiographic strain, we sought to evaluate values of deformation components in the setting of severe AS and to correlate these values with exercise tolerance and with patients' outcome. METHODS AND RESULTS Sixty-five asymptomatic patients with severe AS (aortic valve area <1 cm(2)) were studied by echocardiography and exercise treadmill and were compared with controls. Conventional echographic parameters as well as longitudinal, radial, and circumferential deformations by 2D strain were measured at rest. During exercise treadmill, maximum tolerated workload, maximum heart rate, blood pressure, and EKG ST variations were recorded. Patients were then followed during 12 months. Compared with controls, despite similar ejection fractions, AS patients presented with a significantly lower global longitudinal strain (GLS) (-17.8 +/- 3.5 vs. -21.1 +/- 1.8%, P < 0.05) more pronounced in the basal segments (BLS) (-12.4 +/- 2.9 vs. -18.4 +/- 2.5%, P < 0.05). No difference was observed in terms of radial or circumferential strains. In a subgroup of AS patients with abnormal response to exercise, GLS and BLS were significantly lower (-14.7 +/- 5.1 vs. -19.3 +/- 4.0% and -10.7 +/- 2.5 vs. -14.4 +/- 2.1%, P < 0.05). With cut-offs of -18 and -13%, GLS and BLS were able to determine an inadequate exercise response with a sensitivity and specificity of 68 and 75% (AUC 0.77), and 77 and 83% (AUC 0.81), respectively. Finally, patients with a basal strain below -13% presented with more cardiac events in the follow-up. CONCLUSION In asymptomatic patients with severe AS, impaired longitudinal contraction assessed by 2D strain is associated with abnormal exercise response and with an increased risk of cardiac events during follow-up.

[1]  R. Neviere,et al.  Left Ventricular Response to Exercise in Aortic Stenosis: An Exercise Echocardiographic Study , 2007, Echocardiography.

[2]  J. Nielsen-Kudsk,et al.  Recovery of left ventricular systolic longitudinal strain after valve replacement in aortic stenosis and relation to natriuretic peptides. , 2007, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[3]  L. Pierard,et al.  Determinants of an abnormal response to exercise in patients with asymptomatic valvular aortic stenosis. , 2007, European journal of echocardiography : the journal of the Working Group on Echocardiography of the European Society of Cardiology.

[4]  A. Kerr,et al.  Longitudinal left ventricular contractile dysfunction after exercise in aortic stenosis , 2006, Heart.

[5]  S. Nakatani,et al.  Acute improvement in myocardial function assessed by myocardial strain and strain rate after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis. , 2006, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[6]  K. Serri,et al.  Global and regional myocardial function quantification by two-dimensional strain: application in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  J. Seward,et al.  Apex-to-base dispersion in regional timing of left ventricular shortening and lengthening. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  M. Simon,et al.  Prognostic Importance of Quantitative Exercise Doppler Echocardiography in Asymptomatic Valvular Aortic Stenosis , 2005, Circulation.

[9]  H. Rimington,et al.  Exercise testing to stratify risk in aortic stenosis. , 2005, European heart journal.

[10]  G. Breithardt,et al.  Tissue Doppler imaging in patients with moderate to severe aortic valve stenosis: clinical usefulness and diagnostic accuracy. , 2004, American heart journal.

[11]  J. Cleland,et al.  Exercise capacity and cardiac function assessed by tissue Doppler imaging in chronic heart failure , 2004, Heart.

[12]  Alain Cribier,et al.  Acute Improvement in Global and Regional Left Ventricular Systolic Function After Percutaneous Heart Valve Implantation in Patients With Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis , 2004, Circulation.

[13]  Piet Claus,et al.  One-dimensional ultrasonic strain and strain rate imaging: a new approach to the quantitation of regional myocardial function in patients with aortic stenosis. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[14]  P. Pibarot,et al.  Left ventricular longitudinal shortening in patients with aortic stenosis: relationship with symptomatic status. , 2002, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[15]  K. E. Werner,et al.  Treatment decision in asymptomatic aortic valve stenosis: role of exercise testing , 2001, Heart.

[16]  J. Chambers,et al.  Long axis excursion in aortic stenosis , 2001, Heart.

[17]  O. K. Hansen,et al.  Left ventricular systolic and diastolic function in aortic stenosis. Prognostic value after valve replacement and underlying mechanisms. , 1997, European heart journal.

[18]  M Chiariello,et al.  Normalization of left ventricular nonuniformity late after valve replacement for aortic stenosis. , 1996, The American journal of cardiology.

[19]  G. Aurigemma,et al.  Left ventricular hypertrophy and mortality after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis. A high risk subgroup identified by preoperative relative wall thickness. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[20]  J. Dumesnil,et al.  A Mathematical Model of the Dynamic Geometry of the Intact Left Ventricle Its Application to Clinical Data , 1979, Circulation.