Highly Porous Platinum Electrodes for Dry Ear-EEG Measurements

The interest in dry EEG electrodes has increased in recent years and especially as everyday suitability earplugs for measuring drowsiness or focus of auditory attention. However, the challenge is still the need for a good electrode material, which is reliable and can be easily processed for highly personalized applications. Laser processing as used here is a fast and very precise method to produce personalized electrode configurations that meet the high requirements of in-ear EEG electrodes, for example. The arrangement of the electrodes on the very flexible and compressible mats allows an exact alignment of the electrodes to the ear mold and contributes to a high wearing comfort, as no edges or metal protrusions are present. For better transmission properties, an adapted coating process for surface enlargement of platinum electrodes is used, which allows easy control of the thickness and growth form of the porous layer. The porous platinum-copper alloy is chemically very stable, shows no exposed copper residues and enlarges the effective surface area by 40. In a proof-of-principle experiment, these porous platinum electrodes could be used to measure the Berger effect in a dry state using just one ear of a test person. Their signal-to-noise ration and frequency transfer function is comparable to gel-based silver/silver chloride electrodes.

[1]  Thomas Lunner,et al.  Single-channel in-ear-EEG detects the focus of auditory attention to concurrent tone streams and mixed speech , 2016, bioRxiv.

[2]  Joanna Górecka,et al.  The Dependence of Electrode Impedance on the Number of Performed EEG Examinations , 2019, Sensors.

[3]  Daniel J. Strauss,et al.  Time-Resolved In-Vehicle Drowsiness Monitoring Using Multimodal Electrophysiological Data , 2019, 2019 9th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER).

[4]  Julien Penders,et al.  Wearable, Wireless EEG Solutions in Daily Life Applications: What are we Missing? , 2015, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.

[5]  Rui Escadas Martins,et al.  A Novel Dry Active Electrode for EEG Recording , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  Preben Kidmose,et al.  Study of impedance spectra for dry and wet EarEEG electrodes , 2015, 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[7]  T Stieglitz,et al.  Nanostructured platinum grass enables superior impedance reduction for neural microelectrodes. , 2015, Biomaterials.

[8]  Huanyu Cheng,et al.  Flexible Conductive Composite Integrated with Personal Earphone for Wireless, Real-Time Monitoring of Electrophysiological Signs. , 2018, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[9]  Thomas Lunner,et al.  Ear-EEG-Based Objective Hearing Threshold Estimation Evaluated on Normal Hearing Subjects , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  Martin G Bleichner,et al.  Exploring miniaturized EEG electrodes for brain-computer interfaces. An EEG you do not see? , 2015, Physiological reports.

[11]  Chris Van Hoof,et al.  Soft, Comfortable Polymer Dry Electrodes for High Quality ECG and EEG Recording , 2014, Sensors.

[12]  D. P. Mandic,et al.  The In-the-Ear Recording Concept: User-Centered and Wearable Brain Monitoring , 2012, IEEE Pulse.

[13]  Preben Kidmose,et al.  Ear-EEG from generic earpieces: A feasibility study , 2013, 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[14]  Thomas Stieglitz,et al.  Graphitic Carbon Electrodes on Flexible Substrate for Neural Applications Entirely Fabricated Using Infrared Nanosecond Laser Technology , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[15]  Preben Kidmose,et al.  Accurate whole-night sleep monitoring with dry-contact ear-EEG , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[16]  Joong Hoon Lee,et al.  CNT/PDMS-based canal-typed ear electrodes for inconspicuous EEG recording. , 2014, Journal of neural engineering.

[17]  H. Maibach,et al.  Copper hypersensitivity: dermatologic aspects * , 2004, Dermatologic therapy.

[18]  B. B. Narakathu,et al.  Development of printed and flexible dry ECG electrodes , 2018, Sensing and Bio-Sensing Research.

[19]  Martin Luessi,et al.  MEG and EEG data analysis with MNE-Python , 2013, Front. Neuroinform..

[20]  Kaare B. Mikkelsen,et al.  EEG Recorded from the Ear: Characterizing the Ear-EEG Method , 2015, Front. Neurosci..

[21]  R. Zengerle,et al.  Pulsed Electrodeposition of Highly Porous Pt Alloys for use in Methanol, Formic Acid, and Glucose Fuel Cells , 2018 .

[22]  T. Stieglitz,et al.  Rapid prototyping of flexible intrafascicular electrode arrays by picosecond laser structuring , 2017, Journal of neural engineering.

[23]  Guangli Li,et al.  Towards gel-free electrodes: A systematic study of electrode-skin impedance , 2017 .

[24]  Preben Kidmose,et al.  Dry-Contact Electrode Ear-EEG , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[25]  Tyler S. Grummett,et al.  Measurement of neural signals from inexpensive, wireless and dry EEG systems , 2015, Physiological measurement.