Clinicians' Attitudes to Recruitment to Randomised Trials in Cancer Care: A Qualitative Study

Objectives: To explore attitudes to and problems experienced with recruitment into randomised trials in cancer care. Methods: In-depth semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of 20 hospital clinicians in the South West of England identified from 192 participants in a larger postal survey. Interviews were recorded on audiotape and fully transcribed. Data were analysed by comparing transcripts and describing emergent themes. Results: Clinicians do not always find it easy to identify key randomised trials in their area of interest. Even when they identify those trials in which they would like to participate, they are not always able to recruit patients. Although recruitment can be hindered by the time and administration involved and the resources needed, the attitudes of clinicians to research in general, the design of randomised trials, clinicians' concerns regarding individual patients and patients' preferences for different treatments also present major barriers. Other factors of concern include the imposition of strict eligibility criteria and the expense and complexity of monitoring and follow-up. Conclusion: Barriers to recruitment depend on the clinicians' individual situations and on a complex combination of factors. Action is needed to promote awareness of randomised trials under way, to ensure that trials address issues of importance, are acceptable to patients and clinicians, and that practical support is provided for participating centres.

[1]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Qualitative Analysis For Social Scientists , 1987 .

[2]  Richard E. Morehouse,et al.  Beginning Qualitative Research: A Philosophical and Practical Guide , 1994 .

[3]  A. Rademaker,et al.  Oncologists' reluctance to accrue patients onto clinical trials: an Illinois Cancer Center study. , 1991, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  E. Rous Conducting clinical research in the new NHS , 1994, BMJ.

[5]  M. Baum,et al.  New approach for recruitment into randomised controlled trials , 1993, The Lancet.

[6]  I. Fleming Barriers to clinical trials: Part I: Reimbursement problems , 1994, Cancer.

[7]  A. Bowling,et al.  Volunteers or victims: patients' views of randomised cancer clinical trials. , 1995, British Journal of Cancer.

[8]  S. B. Robinson,et al.  Attitudes of African-Americans regarding prostate cancer clinical trials , 1996 .

[9]  W S Schain,et al.  Barriers to clinical trials: Part II: Knowledge and attitudes of potential participants , 1994 .

[10]  A. Rodger,et al.  Recruitment to a prospective breast conservation trial: why are so few patients randomised? , 1990, BMJ.

[11]  C. Moertel,et al.  Improving accrual into cancer clinical trials. , 1991, Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education.

[12]  Winn Rj,et al.  Obstacles to the accrual of patients to clinical trials in the community setting. , 1994 .

[13]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  Better reporting of randomised controlled trials: the CONSORT statement , 1996, BMJ.

[14]  R. Lilford,et al.  The ethics of randomised controlled trials from the perspectives of patients, the public, and healthcare professionals , 1998, BMJ.

[15]  K McPherson,et al.  Incorporating patient preferences into clinical trials , 1998, BMJ.

[16]  C. Warlow,et al.  How to do it. Organise a multicentre trial. , 1990, BMJ.

[17]  B. Farrell Efficient management of randomised controlled trials: nature or nurture , 1998, BMJ.

[18]  Jenny L Donovan,et al.  Random allocation or allocation at random? Patients' perspectives of participation in a randomised controlled trial , 1998, BMJ.

[19]  T. Albrecht,et al.  Communication, accrual to clinical trials, and the physician-patient relationship: implications for training programs. , 2009, Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education.

[20]  Judith Green,et al.  Commentary: grounded theory and the constant comparative method. , 1998, BMJ.

[21]  T. Richards,et al.  The NUDIST qualitative data analysis system , 1991 .

[22]  D. Torgerson,et al.  Understanding controlled trials: What is a patient preference trial? , 1998, BMJ.

[23]  J. Till,et al.  Why are (or are not) patients given the option to enter clinical trials? , 1987, Controlled clinical trials.

[24]  S. B. Robinson,et al.  Attitude of African-Americans regarding prostate cancer clinical trials. , 1996, Journal of community health.

[25]  R J Lilford,et al.  Equipoise and the ethics of randomization. , 1995, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[26]  C. Gotay,et al.  Accrual to cancer clinical trials: directions from the research literature. , 1991, Social science & medicine.