Collision handling in virtual environments; facilitating natural user motion

As we move through the world, we get around most objects using low-level psyche-motor behaviors, which require little conscious thought. In most virtual reality (VR) applications, the user also needs to get around objects in a reasonable way. However, most interfaces provide neither the sensory input nor the body control for users to move about as they do in the real world. We studied three prototypical methods of collision handling in VR: Either the user goes through an object like a ghost, stops dead on contact, or slides around it. In two experiments, subjects used a screen-and-mouse interface to navigate clutter virtual mazes. We found that the third method, sliding, enables superior navigation. While it does not simulate human avoidance behaviors, it does model their effect in terms of object avoidance. Significantly, screen-and-mouse is both the most used and least studied VR interface.

[1]  E. Reed The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1989 .

[2]  Mel Slater,et al.  Simulating peripheral vision in immersive virtual environments , 1993, Comput. Graph..

[3]  Chris Marrin,et al.  Teach Yourself Vrml 2 in 21 Days , 1997 .

[4]  David Zeltzer,et al.  Autonomy, Interaction, and Presence , 1992, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[5]  P ? ? ? ? ? ? ? % ? ? ? ? , 1991 .

[6]  Joseph H. Goldberg,et al.  Video texture cues enhance stereoscopic depth perception in a virtual reality-based, telerobotic interface , 1995, 1995 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Intelligent Systems for the 21st Century.

[7]  E. Hall,et al.  The Hidden Dimension , 1970 .

[8]  I. Altman,et al.  Handbook of environmental psychology , 1987 .

[9]  John B. Shoven,et al.  I , Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal.

[10]  Ian P. Howard,et al.  Spatial vision within egocentric and exocentric frames of reference , 1991 .