Quantum prisoners’ dilemma under enhanced interrogation

In the quantum version of prisoners’ dilemma, each prisoner is equipped with a single qubit that the interrogator can entangle. We enlarge the available Hilbert space by introducing a third qubit that the interrogator can entangle with the other two. We discuss an enhanced interrogation technique based on tripartite entanglement and analyze Nash equilibria. We show that for tripartite entanglement approaching a W-state, we calculate the Nash equilibria numerically and show that they coincide with the Pareto-optimal choice where both prisoners cooperate. Upon continuous variation between a W-state and a pure bipartite entangled state, the game is shown to have a surprisingly rich structure. The role of bipartite and tripartite entanglement is explored to explain that structure. As an application, we consider an evolutionary game based on our quantum game with a network of agents on a square lattice with periodic boundary conditions and show that the strategy corresponding to Nash equilibrium completely dominates without placing any restrictions on the initial set of strategies.

[1]  S. Bonhoeffer,et al.  Cooperation and Competition in the Evolution of ATP-Producing Pathways , 2001, Science.

[2]  Constancio M. Arizmendi,et al.  Quantum Game Application to Spectrum Scarcity Problems , 2016, ArXiv.

[3]  P. Hayden,et al.  Comment on "quantum games and quantum strategies". , 2000, Physical Review Letters.

[4]  A. Schmidt,et al.  Quantum Russian roulette , 2013 .

[5]  Simon C. Benjamin,et al.  Multiplayer quantum games , 2001 .

[6]  Luca Marinatto,et al.  A quantum approach to static games of complete information , 2000 .

[7]  Azhar Iqbal,et al.  Quantum mechanics gives stability to a Nash equilibrium , 2002 .

[8]  Derek Abbott,et al.  Quantum Strategies Win in a Defector-Dominated Population , 2011, ArXiv.

[9]  Adrian P. Flitney,et al.  Aspects of quantum game theory , 2005 .

[10]  Edward W. Piotrowski,et al.  An Invitation to Quantum Game Theory , 2002, ArXiv.

[11]  Steven E. Landsburg,et al.  Nash equilibria in quantum games , 2011, 1110.1351.

[12]  Noah Linden,et al.  Connection between Bell nonlocality and Bayesian game theory , 2012, Nature Communications.

[13]  Radhakrishnan Balu,et al.  Characterizing the Nash equilibria of a three-player Bayesian quantum game , 2017, Quantum Inf. Process..

[14]  S. Schuster,et al.  An example of the prisoner's dilemma in biochemistry , 2003, Naturwissenschaften.

[15]  Paul E. Turner,et al.  Prisoner's dilemma in an RNA virus , 1999, Nature.

[16]  D. Meyer Quantum strategies , 1998, quant-ph/9804010.

[17]  J. Eisert,et al.  Quantum Games and Quantum Strategies , 1998, quant-ph/9806088.

[18]  Kevin Bradley Clark,et al.  Bioreaction Quantum Computing without Quantum Diffusion , 2012 .

[19]  O. G. Zabaleta,et al.  Quantum dating market , 2010, 1003.1153.

[20]  Franck Delaplace,et al.  Games network and application to PAs system , 2007, Biosyst..

[21]  Lukasz Pawela Quantum games on evolving random networks , 2016 .

[22]  Rubens Viana Ramos,et al.  Multiplayer quantum games and its application as access controller in architecture of quantum computers , 2008, Quantum Inf. Process..

[23]  J. Cirac,et al.  Three qubits can be entangled in two inequivalent ways , 2000, quant-ph/0005115.