The Effectiveness of Prenatal Care Programs on Reducing Preterm Birth in Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Preterm Birth (PTB) is one of the leading causes of infant morbidity and mortality. Prenatal care is an effective way to improve pregnancy outcomes but there is limited evidence of effective interventions to improve perinatal outcomes in disadvantaged pregnant women. This review was conducted with the aim to assess the effectiveness of prenatal care programs in reducing PTB in socioeconomically disadvantaged women. Materials and Methods: We searched the Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases from January 1, 1990 to August 31, 2021. The inclusion criteria included clinical trials and cohort studies focusing on prenatal care in deprived women with the primary outcome of PTB (< 37 weeks). Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias and the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Heterogeneity was evaluated using the Q test and I2 statistics. The pooled odds ratio was calculated using random-effects models. Results: In total, 14 articles covering 22,526 women were included in the meta-analysis. Interventions/exposures included group prenatal care, home visits, psychosomatic programs, integrated intervention on socio-behavioral risk factors, and behavioral intervention through education, social support, joint management, and multidisciplinary care. The pooled results showed that all types of interventions/exposure were associated with a reduction in the risk of PTB [OR = 0.86; 95% confidence interval: (0.64, 1.16); I2 = 79.42%]. Conclusions: Alternative models of prenatal care reduce PTB in socioeconomically disadvantaged women compared with standard care. The limited number of studies may affect the power of this study.

[1]  Na Liu,et al.  Effects of home visits for pregnant and postpartum women on premature birth, low birth weight and rapid repeat birth: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials. , 2019, Family practice.

[2]  V. Welch,et al.  Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. , 2019, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[3]  J. Mancilla-Ramirez,et al.  The role of complement in preterm birth and prematurity , 2019, Journal of perinatal medicine.

[4]  C. East,et al.  Support during pregnancy for women at increased risk of low birthweight babies. , 2019, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[5]  C. Homer,et al.  Short-term and long-term effects of caesarean section on the health of women and children , 2018, The Lancet.

[6]  P. Lumbiganon,et al.  The global epidemiology of preterm birth. , 2018, Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology.

[7]  D. Haas,et al.  A systematic overview of the literature regarding group prenatal care for high-risk pregnant women , 2017, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

[8]  B. Asamoah,et al.  Effectiveness of antenatal care services in reducing neonatal mortality in Kenya: analysis of national survey data , 2017, Global health action.

[9]  G. Colditz,et al.  Group Prenatal Care Compared With Traditional Prenatal Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis , 2016, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[10]  M. Rice,et al.  Preterm neonatal morbidity and mortality by gestational age: a contemporary cohort. , 2016, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[11]  S. Acharya,et al.  Risk Factors for Preterm Birth and Low Birth Weight Among Pregnant Indian Women: A Hospital-based Prospective Study , 2016, Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi.

[12]  S. Puthussery.  Perinatal outcomes among migrant mothers in the United Kingdom: Is it a matter of biology, behaviour, policy, social determinants or access to health care? , 2016, Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology.

[13]  E. Frongillo,et al.  The comparative effects of group prenatal care on psychosocial outcomes , 2016, Archives of Women's Mental Health.

[14]  J. Hardin,et al.  Group Prenatal Care Results in Medicaid Savings with Better Outcomes: A Propensity Score Analysis of CenteringPregnancy Participation in South Carolina , 2016, Maternal and Child Health Journal.

[15]  L. Mbuagbaw,et al.  Health system and community level interventions for improving antenatal care coverage and health outcomes , 2015, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[16]  A. Ghidini,et al.  Preterm labor: approach to decreasing complications of prematurity. , 2015, Obstetrics and gynecology clinics of North America.

[17]  T. Murrells,et al.  An investigation of the relationship between the caseload model of midwifery for socially disadvantaged women and childbirth outcomes using routine data--a retrospective, observational study. , 2015, Midwifery.

[18]  F. Mcauliffe,et al.  Home based educational intervention to improve perinatal outcomes for a disadvantaged community: a randomised control trial. , 2014, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[19]  Mark Loeb,et al.  Newcastle-Ottawa Scale: comparing reviewers’ to authors’ assessments , 2014, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[20]  S. Tracy,et al.  A cost-consequences analysis of a midwifery group practice for Aboriginal mothers and infants in the top end of the Northern Territory, Australia. , 2014, Midwifery.

[21]  M. Sáez,et al.  Antenatal psychosomatic programming to reduce postpartum depression risk and improve childbirth outcomes: a randomized controlled trial in Spain and France , 2014, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

[22]  Tomoko Kamei,et al.  Information and communication technology for home care in the future. , 2013, Japan journal of nursing science : JJNS.

[23]  J. A. Short,et al.  Dosage Effect of Prenatal Home Visiting on Pregnancy Outcomes in At-Risk, First-Time Mothers , 2013, Pediatrics.

[24]  D. Devane,et al.  Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women. , 2016, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[25]  C. Roberts,et al.  Social inequality and infant health in the UK: systematic review and meta-analyses , 2012, BMJ Open.

[26]  Gynecologists.  ACOG practice bulletin no. 127: Management of preterm labor. , 2012, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[27]  D. Blackhurst,et al.  The effect of CenteringPregnancy group prenatal care on preterm birth in a low-income population. , 2012, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[28]  Allan A Johnson,et al.  An Integrated Randomized Intervention to Reduce Behavioral and Psychosocial Risks: Pregnancy and Neonatal Outcomes , 2012, Maternal and Child Health Journal.

[29]  Cesar G Victora,et al.  Equity in maternal, newborn, and child health interventions in Countdown to 2015: a retrospective review of survey data from 54 countries , 2012, The Lancet.

[30]  M. D. de Vera,et al.  Study of the costs and morbidities of late-preterm birth , 2012, Archives of Disease in Childhood: Fetal and Neonatal Edition.

[31]  J. Sterne,et al.  The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials , 2011, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[32]  G. Vimpani,et al.  Child and family outcomes of a long-term nurse home visitation programme: a randomised controlled trial , 2011, Archives of Disease in Childhood.

[33]  A. Handler,et al.  A review of prenatal home-visiting effectiveness for improving birth outcomes. , 2011, Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN.

[34]  L. Oakley,et al.  The effectiveness of antenatal care programmes to reduce infant mortality and preterm birth in socially disadvantaged and vulnerable women in high-income countries: a systematic review , 2011, BMC pregnancy and childbirth.

[35]  C. Dennis,et al.  Prevalence and risk factors for postpartum depression among women with preterm and low‐birth‐weight infants: a systematic review , 2010, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[36]  Louis J Muglia,et al.  The enigma of spontaneous preterm birth. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[37]  D. Altman,et al.  Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies , 2008 .

[38]  J. Ickovics,et al.  Group Prenatal Care and Perinatal Outcomes: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2007, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[39]  E. Hodnett,et al.  Support during pregnancy for women at increased risk of low birthweight babies. , 2003, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[40]  J. Ickovics,et al.  Group Prenatal Care and Preterm Birth Weight: Results From a Matched Cohort Study at Public Clinics , 2003, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[41]  T. Ganiats,et al.  Outcomes, safety, and resource utilization in a collaborative care birth center program compared with traditional physician-based perinatal care. , 2003, American journal of public health.

[42]  E. A. Reece,et al.  Intensive interventional maternity care reduces infant morbidity and hospital costs , 2002, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[43]  P. Meis,et al.  A Randomized Trial of Nurse Intervention to Reduce Preterm and Low Birth Weight Births , 1998, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[44]  C. Henderson,et al.  Effect of prenatal and infancy home visitation by nurses on pregnancy outcomes, childhood injuries, and repeated childbearing. A randomized controlled trial. , 1997, JAMA.

[45]  A. Rothberg,et al.  Psychosocial support for maternal stress during pregnancy: effect on birth weight. , 1991, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[46]  N. Welton,et al.  Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 3: Heterogeneity Subgroups, Meta-Regression, Bias, and Bias-Adjustment. Medical Decision (5), , 2013 .

[47]  J. Higgins.  Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration , 2011 .