Eye Fixations on Advertisements and Memory for Brands: A Model and Findings

The number of brands in the marketplace has vastly increased in the 1980s and 1990s, and the amount of money spent on advertising has run parallel. Print advertising is a major communication instrument for advertisers, but print media have become cluttered with advertisements for brands. Therefore, it has become difficult to attract and keep consumers' attention. Advertisements that fail to gain and retain consumers' attention cannot be effective, but attention is not sufficient: Advertising needs to leave durable traces of brands in memory. Eye movements are eminent indicators of visual attention. However, what is currently missing in eye movementresearch is a serious account of the processing that takes place to store information in long-term memory. We attempt to provide such an account through the development of a formal model. We model the process by which eye fixations on print advertisements lead to memory for the advertised brands, using a hierarchical Bayesian model, but, rather than postulating such a model as a mere data-analysis tool, we derive it from substantive theory on attention and memory. The model is calibrated to eye-movement data that are collected during exposure of subjects to ads in magazines, and subsequent recognition of the brand in a perceptual memory task. During exposure to the ads we record the frequencies of fixations on three ad elements; brand, pictorial and text and, during the memory task, the accuracy and latency of memory. Thus, the available data for each subject consist of the frequency of fixations on the ad elements and the accuracy and the latency of memory. The model that we develop is grounded in attention and memory theory and describes information extraction and accumulation during ad exposure and their effect on the accuracy and latency of brand memory. In formulating it, we assume that subjects have different eye-fixation rates for the different ad elements, because of which a negative binomial model of fixation frequency arises, and we specify the influence of the size of the ad elements. It is assumed that the number of fixations, not their duration, is related to the amount of information a consumer extracts from an ad. The information chunks extracted at each fixation are assumed to be random, varying across ads and consumers, and are estimated from the observed data. The accumulation of information across multiple fixations to the ad elements in long-term memory is assumed to be additive. The total amount of accumulated information that is not directly observed but estimated using our model influences both the accuracy and latency of subsequent brand memory. Accurate memory is assumed to occur when the accumulated information exceeds a threshold that varies randomly across ads and consumers in a binary probit-type of model component. The effect of two media-planning variables, the ad's serial position in a magazine and the ad's location on the double page, on the brand memory threshold are specified. We formulate hypotheses on the effects of ad element surface, serial position, and location. The model is applied in a study involving a sample of 88 consumers who were exposed to 65 print ads appearing in their natural context in two magazines. The frequency of eye fixations was recorded for each consumer and advertisement with infrared eye-tracking methodology. In a subsequent indirect memory task, consumers identified the brands from pixelated images of the ads. Across the two magazines, fixations to the pictorial and the brand systematically promote accurate brand memory, but text fixations do not. Brand surface has a particularly prominent effect. The more information is extracted from an ad during fixations, the shorter the latency of brand memory is. We find a systematic recency effect: When subjects are exposed to an ad later, they tend to identify it better. In addition, there is a small primacy effect. The effect of the ad's location on the right or left of the page depends on the advertising context. We show how the model supports advertising planning and testing and offer recommendations for further research on the effectiveness of brand communication. In future research the model may be extended to accommodate the effects of repeated exposure to ads, to further detail the representation of strength and association of memory, and to include the effects of creative tactics and media planning variables beyond the ones we included in the present study.

[1]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Models for recall and recognition. , 1992, Annual review of psychology.

[2]  R. Pieters,et al.  Visual attention to advertising: A segment-level analysis , 1997 .

[3]  K. Rayner,et al.  Eye Movements in Reading: Perceptual and Language Processes , 1985 .

[4]  Christian Coëffé,et al.  Reducing the influence of non-target stimuli on saccade accuracy: Predictability and latency effects , 1987, Vision Research.

[5]  T. K. Srull,et al.  Human cognition in its social context. , 1986, Psychological review.

[6]  R. Pieters,et al.  Visual attention during brand choice : The impact of time pressure and task motivation , 1999 .

[7]  Louisa Ha,et al.  Does Advertising Clutter Have Diminishing and Negative Returns , 1997 .

[8]  Chris Janiszewski,et al.  The Influence of Display Characteristics on Visual Exploratory Search Behavior , 1998 .

[9]  L. Jacoby,et al.  On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[10]  M. Holbrook,et al.  Consumer Responses to Advertising: The Effects of Ad Content, Emotions, and Attitude toward the Ad on Viewing Time , 1991 .

[11]  P. Viviani Eye movements in visual search: cognitive, perceptual and motor control aspects. , 1990, Reviews of oculomotor research.

[12]  C. H. Sandage Advertising theory and practice , 1979 .

[13]  Dominique M. Hanssens,et al.  The Effectiveness of Industrial Print Advertisements across Product Categories , 1980 .

[14]  K. Rayner Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[15]  J. Henderson Visual Attention and Eye Movement Control During Reading and Picture Viewing , 1992 .

[16]  J. Kruschke Base rates in category learning. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  R. Pieters,et al.  Visual Attention to Repeated Print Advertising: A Test of Scanpath Theory , 1999 .

[18]  Robert L. Greene,et al.  Sources of recency effects in free recall. , 1986 .

[19]  Yoshio Takane,et al.  Structures in two-choice reaction-time data. , 1987 .

[20]  Dipankar Chakravarti,et al.  Memory Measures for Pretesting Advertisements: An Integrative Conceptual Framework and a Diagnostic Template , 1999 .

[21]  James Spier Karslake The Purdue eye-camera: a practical apparatus for studying the attention value of advertisements. , 1940 .

[22]  G. Loftus Eye fixations and recognition memory for pictures , 1972 .

[23]  C. Bundesen A theory of visual attention. , 1990, Psychological review.

[24]  Stewart Shapiro,et al.  Comparing implicit and explicit memory for brand names from advertisements. , 1996 .

[25]  Peter Green,et al.  Markov chain Monte Carlo in Practice , 1996 .

[26]  G. Judge,et al.  The Theory and Practice of Econometrics , 1981 .

[27]  Adam Finn,et al.  Print Ad Recognition Readership Scores: An Information Processing Perspective , 1988 .

[28]  Peter Schmidt,et al.  The Theory and Practice of Econometrics , 1985 .

[29]  Chris Janiszewski,et al.  The Influence of Nonattended Material on the Processing of Advertising Claims , 1990 .

[30]  Keith Rayner Eye Movements in Reading , 2001 .

[31]  Raymond R. Burke,et al.  Competitive Interference and Consumer Memory for Advertising , 1988 .

[32]  Kevin J. Hawley,et al.  Long-term perceptual memory for briefly exposed words as a function of awareness and attention. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[33]  Douglas L. Hintzman,et al.  Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model. , 1988 .

[34]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[35]  David A. Aaker,et al.  Brand Equity and Advertising: Advertising's Role in Building Strong Brands , 1994 .

[36]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  Measures of Memory , 1988 .

[37]  Chris Janiszewski,et al.  The Influence of Print Advertisement Organization on Affect Toward a Brand Name , 1990 .

[38]  G. Sperling,et al.  Episodic theory of the dynamics of spatial attention. , 1995 .

[39]  J. Rossiter,et al.  Advertising communications & promotion management , 1997 .

[40]  A. Zeman Attentional Processing. The Brain's Art of Mindfulness , 1996 .

[41]  N. Mackworth,et al.  Cognitive determinants of fixation location during picture viewing. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[42]  N. Cowan Attention and Memory: An Integrated Framework , 1995 .

[43]  J. Townsend,et al.  Decision field theory: a dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. , 1993, Psychological review.

[44]  David B. Dunson,et al.  Bayesian Data Analysis , 2010 .

[45]  George W. McConkie,et al.  Eye Movements and Perception during Reading. , 1982 .