A Method for Lower Back Motion Assessment Using Wearable 6D Inertial Sensors

Low back pain (LBP) is a leading cause of activity limitation. Objective assessment of the spinal motion plays a key role in diagnosis and treatment of LBP. We propose a method that facilitates clinical assessment of lower back motions by means of a wireless inertial sensor network. The sensor units are attached to the right and left side of the lumbar region, the pelvis and the thighs, respectively. Since magnetometers are known to be unreliable in indoor environments, we use only 3D accelerometer and 3D gyroscope readings. Compensation of integration drift in the horizontal plane is achieved by estimating the gyroscope biases from automatically detected initial rest phases. For the estimation of sensor orientations, both a smoothing algorithm and a filtering algorithm are presented. From these orientations, we determine three-dimensional joint angles between the thighs and the pelvis and between the pelvis and the lumbar region. We compare the orientations and joint angles to measurements of an optical motion tracking system that tracks each skin-mounted sensor by means of reflective markers. Eight subjects perform a neutral initial pose, then flexion/extension, lateral flexion, and rotation of the trunk. The root mean square deviation between inertial and optical angles is about one degree for angles in the frontal and sagittal plane and about two degrees for angles in the transverse plane (both values averaged over all trials). We choose five features that characterize the initial pose and the three motions. Interindividual differences of all features are found to be clearly larger than the observed measurement deviations. These results indicate that the proposed inertial sensor-based method is a promising tool for lower back motion assessment.

[1]  Thomas Seel,et al.  Automatic anatomical calibration for IMU-based elbow angle measurement in disturbed magnetic fields , 2017 .

[2]  Alison H. McGregor,et al.  Is there evidence to use kinematic/kinetic measures clinically in low back pain patients? A systematic review , 2018, Clinical biomechanics.

[3]  Josien C van den Noort,et al.  Evaluation of clinical spasticity assessment in cerebral palsy using inertial sensors. , 2009, Gait & posture.

[4]  Thomas Seel,et al.  Experimental Evaluation of a Novel Inertial Sensor Based Realtime Gait Phase De-tection Algorithm , 2015 .

[5]  Thomas Seel,et al.  Eliminating the Effect of Magnetic Disturbances on the Inclination Estimates of Inertial Sensors , 2017 .

[6]  Mahmoud El-Gohary,et al.  Human Joint Angle Estimation with Inertial Sensors and Validation with A Robot Arm , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  Thomas B. Schön,et al.  An optimization-based approach to human body motion capture using inertial sensors , 2014 .

[8]  Jeroen D. Hol,et al.  Sensor Fusion and Calibration of Inertial Sensors, Vision, Ultra-Wideband and GPS , 2011 .

[9]  Thomas Seel,et al.  The adaptive drop foot stimulator - Multivariable learning control of foot pitch and roll motion in paretic gait. , 2016, Medical engineering & physics.

[10]  Xiaoping Yun,et al.  An investigation of the effects of magnetic variations on inertial/magnetic orientation sensors , 2004, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA '04. 2004.

[11]  Thomas B. Schön,et al.  Using Inertial Sensors for Position and Orientation Estimation , 2017, Found. Trends Signal Process..

[12]  Thomas Seel,et al.  IMU-Based Joint Angle Measurement for Gait Analysis , 2014, Sensors.

[13]  Kamiar Aminian,et al.  3D gait assessment in young and elderly subjects using foot-worn inertial sensors. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  Norbert Schmitz,et al.  Ambulatory inertial spinal tracking using constraints , 2014, BODYNETS.

[15]  Christina Zong-Hao Ma,et al.  Balance Improvement Effects of Biofeedback Systems with State-of-the-Art Wearable Sensors: A Systematic Review , 2016, Sensors.