Predicting subsurface stormflow response of a forested hillslope - the role of connected flow paths

Rapid flow processes in connected preferential flow paths are widely accepted to play a key role in the rainfall–runoff response at the hillslope scale, but a quantitative description of these processes is still a major challenge in hydrological research. This paper investigates the approach of incorporating preferential flow paths explicitly in a process-based model for modelling water flow and solute transport at a steep forested hillslope. We conceptualise preferential flow paths as spatially explicit structures with high conductivity and low retention capacity, and evaluate simulations with different combinations of vertical and lateral flow paths in conjunction with variable or constant soil depths against measured discharge and tracer breakthrough. Out of 122 tested realisations, six set-ups fulfilled our selection criteria for the water flow simulation. These set-ups successfully simulated infiltration, vertical and lateral subsurface flow in structures, and allowed predicting the magnitude, dynamics and water balance of the hydrological response of the hillslope during successive periods of steady-state sprinkling on selected plots and intermittent rainfall on the entire hillslope area. The number of equifinal model set-ups was further reduced by the results of solute transport simulations. Two of the six acceptable model set-ups matched the shape of the observed breakthrough curve well, indicating that macrodispersion induced by preferential flow was captured well by the topology of the preferential flow network. The configurations of successful model set-ups suggest that preferential flow related to connected vertical and lateral flow paths is a first-order control on the hydrology of the study hillslope, whereas spatial variability of soil depth is secondary especially when lateral flow paths are present. Virtual experiments for investigating hillslope controls on subsurface processes should thus consider the effect of distinctive flow paths within the soil mantle. The explicit representation of flow paths in a hydrological process model was found to be a suitable approach for this purpose.

[1]  Keith Beven,et al.  Macropores and water flow in soils revisited , 2013 .

[2]  Markus Weiler,et al.  Hillslope characteristics as controls of subsurface flow variability , 2012 .

[3]  R. Helmig,et al.  Modeling Macroporous Soils with a Two-Phase Dual-Permeability Model , 2012, Transport in Porous Media.

[4]  D. Jongmans,et al.  Application of geophysical measurements for assessing the role of fissures in water infiltration within a clay landslide (Trièves area, French Alps) , 2012 .

[5]  Rabi H. Mohtar,et al.  Field method for separating the contribution of surface‐connected preferential flow pathways from flow through the soil matrix , 2012 .

[6]  Shahar Baram,et al.  Water percolation through a clayey vadose zone , 2012 .

[7]  Aldo Fiori,et al.  On Preferential Flow, Channeling and Connectivity in Heterogeneous Porous Formations , 2012, Mathematical Geosciences.

[8]  Thom Bogaard,et al.  A conceptual model of the hydrological influence of fissures on landslide activity , 2011 .

[9]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  Examining the role of throughfall patterns on subsurface stormflow generation , 2011 .

[10]  Giuseppe Perale,et al.  Diffusion and aggregation of sodium fluorescein in aqueous solutions. , 2011, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[11]  Erwin Zehe,et al.  A novel explicit approach to model bromide and pesticide transport in connected soil structures , 2011 .

[12]  Erwin Zehe,et al.  Challenges in Understanding the Hydrologic Controls on the Mobility of Slow‐Moving Landslides , 2011 .

[13]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  Gypsies in the palace: experimentalist's view on the use of 3‐D physics‐based simulation of hillslope hydrological response , 2010 .

[14]  B. Kelly,et al.  Detection of subsurface soil cracks by vertical anisotropy profiles of apparent electrical resistivity , 2010 .

[15]  Julian Klaus,et al.  Modelling rapid flow response of a tile‐drained field site using a 2D physically based model: assessment of ‘equifinal’ model setups , 2010 .

[16]  S. R. Hencher,et al.  Preferential flow paths through soil and rock and their association with landslides , 2010 .

[17]  John L. Nieber,et al.  How do disconnected macropores in sloping soils facilitate preferential flow? , 2010 .

[18]  J. A. Jones,et al.  Soil piping and catchment response , 2010 .

[19]  Erwin Zehe,et al.  The principle of ‘maximum energy dissipation’: a novel thermodynamic perspective on rapid water flow in connected soil structures , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  Rabi H. Mohtar,et al.  New method for the characterization of three‐dimensional preferential flow paths in the field , 2010 .

[21]  Erwin Zehe,et al.  Plot and field scale soil moisture dynamics and subsurface wetness control on runoff generation in a headwater in the Ore Mountains , 2009 .

[22]  Younes Alila,et al.  Subsurface flow velocities in a hillslope with lateral preferential flow , 2009 .

[23]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  Connectivity at the hillslope scale: identifying interactions between storm size, bedrock permeability, slope angle and soil depth. , 2009 .

[24]  Hervé Andrieu,et al.  Modeling the influence of an artificial macropore in sandy columns on flow and solute transfer , 2009 .

[25]  M. Sivapalan,et al.  Threshold behaviour in hydrological systems as (human) geo-ecosystems: Manifestations, controls, implications , 2009 .

[26]  Erwin Zehe,et al.  Applied tracers for the observation of subsurface stormflow at the hillslope scale , 2009 .

[27]  Erwin Zehe,et al.  Process identification through rejection of model structures in a mid‐mountainous rural catchment: observations of rainfall–runoff response, geophysical conditions and model inter‐comparison , 2009 .

[28]  John Maximilian Köhne,et al.  A review of model applications for structured soils: a) Water flow and tracer transport. , 2009, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[29]  S. Barbour,et al.  Fracture‐Dominated Subsurface Flow and Transport in a Sloping Reclamation Cover , 2009 .

[30]  Younes Alila,et al.  Dye staining and excavation of a lateral preferential flow network. , 2008 .

[31]  Stephen R. Green,et al.  Preferential flow and transport in soil: progress and prognosis , 2007 .

[32]  Isabelle Cousin,et al.  Numerical modelling of direct current electrical resistivity for the characterisation of cracks in soils , 2007 .

[33]  Richard P. Hooper,et al.  Moving beyond heterogeneity and process complexity: A new vision for watershed hydrology , 2007 .

[34]  N. Jarvis.  A review of non‐equilibrium water flow and solute transport in soil macropores: principles, controlling factors and consequences for water quality , 2007 .

[35]  Markus Weiler,et al.  Conceptualizing lateral preferential flow and flow networks and simulating the effects on gauged and ungauged hillslopes , 2007 .

[36]  Horst H. Gerke,et al.  Preferential flow descriptions for structured soils , 2006 .

[37]  J. McDonnell,et al.  112 Subsurface Stormflow , 2006 .

[38]  S. Attinger,et al.  Importance of spatial structures in advancing hydrological sciences , 2006 .

[39]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  Threshold relations in subsurface stormflow: 1. A 147‐storm analysis of the Panola hillslope , 2006 .

[40]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  Threshold relations in subsurface stormflow: 2. The fill and spill hypothesis , 2006 .

[41]  Erwin Zehe,et al.  Uncertainty of simulated catchment runoff response in the presence of threshold processes: Role of initial soil moisture and precipitation , 2005 .

[42]  Roy C. Sidle,et al.  Development of a simple lateral preferential flow model with steady state application in hillslope soils , 2005 .

[43]  H. Vogel,et al.  The dominant role of structure for solute transport in soil: Experimental evidence and modelling of structure and transport in a field experiment , 2005 .

[44]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  The role of lateral pipe flow in hillslope runoff response: an intercomparison of non-linear hillslope response , 2005 .

[45]  Erwin Zehe,et al.  Process identification at a slow‐moving landslide in the Vorarlberg Alps , 2005 .

[46]  Erwin Zehe,et al.  Predictability of hydrologic response at the plot and catchment scales: Role of initial conditions , 2004 .

[47]  Takahisa Mizuyama,et al.  Numerical calculation of soil pipe flow and its effect on water dynamics in a slope , 2004 .

[48]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  Virtual experiments: a new approach for improving process conceptualization in hillslope hydrology , 2004 .

[49]  H. Elsenbeer,et al.  Scale dependency in spatial patterns of saturated hydraulic conductivity , 2004 .

[50]  G. Richard,et al.  Electrical Resistivity Imaging for Detecting Soil Cracking at the Centimetric Scale , 2003 .

[51]  Peter J. Shouse,et al.  Lateral Water Diffusion in an Artificial Macroporous System: Modeling and Experimental Evidence , 2003 .

[52]  Hans-Jörg Vogel,et al.  Moving through scales of flow and transport in soil , 2003 .

[53]  M. V. Genuchten,et al.  Review and comparison of models for describing non-equilibrium and preferential flow and transport in the vadose zone , 2003 .

[54]  Keith Beven,et al.  The role of bedrock topography on subsurface storm flow , 2002 .

[55]  J. Moncrief,et al.  Role of macropore continuity and tortuosity on solute transport in soils: 2. Interactions with model assumptions for macropore description. , 2002, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[56]  J. Moncrief,et al.  Role of macropore continuity and tortuosity on solute transport in soils: 1. Effects of initial and boundary conditions. , 2002, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[57]  J. A. A. Jones,et al.  A semi-distributed simulation model for natural pipeflow , 2002 .

[58]  James M. Buttle,et al.  Coupled vertical and lateral preferential flow on a forested slope , 2002 .

[59]  Takahisa Mizuyama,et al.  Effects of pipeflow on hydrological process and its relation to landslide: a review of pipeflow studies in forested headwater catchments , 2001 .

[60]  Karin Laursen,et al.  A conceptual model of preferential flow systems in forested hillslopes: evidence of self‐organization , 2001 .

[61]  Erwin Zehe,et al.  Preferential transport of isoproturon at a plot scale and a field scale tile-drained site , 2001 .

[62]  Takahisa Mizuyama,et al.  Runoff characteristics of pipeflow and effects of pipeflow on rainfall-runoff phenomena in a mountainous watershed , 1999 .

[63]  Shoji Noguchi,et al.  Morphological Characteristics of Macropores and the Distribution of Preferential Flow Pathways in a Forested Slope Segment , 1999 .

[64]  Kurt Roth,et al.  Transport of conservative chemical through an unsaturated two‐dimensional Miller‐similar medium with steady state flow , 1996 .

[65]  Graham E. Fogg,et al.  Random-Walk Simulation of Transport in Heterogeneous Porous Media: Local Mass-Conservation Problem and Implementation Methods , 1996 .

[66]  J. Buttle,et al.  Runoff Production in a Forested, Shallow Soil, Canadian Shield Basin , 1995 .

[67]  Hannes Flühler,et al.  Transport of Anions and Herbicides in a Loamy and a Sandy Field Soil , 1995 .

[68]  Hannes Flühler,et al.  SUSCEPTIBILITY OF SOILS TO PREFERENTIAL FLOW OF WATER : A FIELD STUDY , 1994 .

[69]  W. Durner.  Hydraulic conductivity estimation for soils with heterogeneous pore structure , 1994 .

[70]  M. Bonell.  Progress in the understanding of runoff generation dynamics in forests , 1993 .

[71]  M. V. Genuchten,et al.  A dual-porosity model for simulating the preferential movement of water and solutes in structured porous media , 1993 .

[72]  J. Nieber,et al.  Soil pipe contribution to steady subsurface stormflow , 1991 .

[73]  M. Celia,et al.  A General Mass-Conservative Numerical Solution for the Unsaturated Flow Equation , 1990 .

[74]  Glenn V. Wilson,et al.  Physical and chemical controls of preferred path flow through a forested hillslope , 1990 .

[75]  K. Beven,et al.  Macropores and water flow in soils , 1982 .

[76]  Van Genuchten,et al.  A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils , 1980 .

[77]  Y. Mualem.  A New Model for Predicting the Hydraulic Conductivity , 1976 .

[78]  S. Moysey,et al.  Can the Onset of Macropore Flow be Detected using Electrical Resistivity Measurements , 2012 .

[79]  J. Ihringer,et al.  Characterization of soil hydraulic properties on a creeping alpine slope. , 2009 .

[80]  Felix Naef,et al.  Subsurface storm flow formation at different hillslopes and implications for the ‘old water paradox’ , 2008 .

[81]  J. Ihringer,et al.  Modeling water flow and mass transport in a loess catchment , 2001 .