A dialogical logic-based simulation architecture for social agents and the emergence of extremist behaviour

In the ourishing research area of agent-based social simulation, the focus is on the emergence of social phenomena from the interactions of individual autonomous agents. There is, however, a relative underexposure of the cognitive properties of agents, as the existing agent architectures often focus on behaviour alone. Cognition becomes particularly salient when the subject under investigation concerns social phenomena where agents need to reason about other agents' beliefs. We see this as a requirement for any communication with some degree of intelligence. In this paper we use concepts and methods from dynamic epistemic logic to build agents capable of reasoning about other agents' beliefs and their own. In dynamic epistemic logic, agents are assumed to be perfect rational reasoners. We break with this unrealistic assumption in order to bridge the gap between the sociological and the logical approach. Our model is based on a minimal set of assumptions representing cognitive processes relevant to modelling the macro-phenomena of group formation and radicalisation.

[1]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  Case Study & Computing: Advanced Qualitative Methods in the Study of Human Behavior , 1996 .

[2]  L. Festinger.  A Theory of Social Comparison Processes , 1954 .

[3]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  Friendship as Social process: a substantive and methodological analysis , 1964 .

[4]  Martin Helmhout.  The Social Cognitive Actor , 2006 .

[5]  Sandra Gonzalez,et al.  Dynamic Social Network Modelling and Analysis: Workshop Summary and Papers Edited by Ronald L. Breiger, Kathleen M. Carley and Philippa Pattison , 2003, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[6]  Guillaume Deffuant,et al.  Comparing Extremism Propagation Patterns in Continuous Opinion Models , 2006, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[7]  Michael E. Bratman,et al.  Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason , 1991 .

[8]  Guillaume Deffuant,et al.  How can extremism prevail? A study based on the relative agreement interaction model , 2002, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[9]  J. Benthem.  Games in dynamic epistemic logic , 2001 .

[10]  Nuel D. Belnap,et al.  Entailment : the logic of relevance and necessity , 1975 .

[11]  Kathleen M. Carley.  Knowledge acquisition as a social phenomenon , 1986 .

[12]  Christian Lebiere,et al.  Cognition and Multi-Agent Interaction: From Cognitive Modeling to Social Simulation , 2006 .

[13]  Ronald Fagin,et al.  Belief, Awareness, and Limited Reasoning. , 1987, Artif. Intell..

[14]  Iyad Rahwan,et al.  Intentional learning agent architecture , 2009, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

[15]  Peter Gärdenfors,et al.  On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions , 1985, Journal of Symbolic Logic.

[16]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  Destabilizing Terrorist Networks , 1998 .

[17]  C. I. Hovland,et al.  Social Judgment: Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Communication and Attitude Change , 1981 .

[18]  Rainer Hegselmann,et al.  Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence: models, analysis and simulation , 2002, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[19]  Jason Noble,et al.  Extremism Propagation in Social Networks with Hubs , 2008, Adapt. Behav..

[20]  Wander Jager,et al.  Uniformity, Bipolarization and Pluriformity Captured as Generic Stylized Behavior with an Agent-Based Simulation Model of Attitude Change , 2005, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[21]  Barbara Dunin-Keplicz,et al.  Agent Theory for Team Formation by Dialogue , 2000, ATAL.

[22]  Vito F. Sinisi,et al.  Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Necessity , 1996 .

[23]  M. Macy,et al.  Learning dynamics in social dilemmas , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  Barbara Dunin-Keplicz,et al.  Awareness as a vital ingredient of teamwork , 2006, AAMAS '06.

[25]  Thomas C. Schelling,et al.  Dynamic models of segregation , 1971 .

[26]  Mehdi Dastani,et al.  Beliefs, obligations, intentions, and desires as components in an agent architecture , 2005, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[27]  Jerry Suls,et al.  Social Comparison: Why, With Whom, and With What Effect? , 2002 .

[28]  R. Sun.  Cognition and Multi-Agent Interactions: From Cognitive Modeling to Social Simulation , 2005 .