A General Framework for Analyzing the Genetic Architecture of Developmental Characteristics

The genetic architecture of growth traits plays a central role in shaping the growth, development, and evolution of organisms. While a limited number of models have been devised to estimate genetic effects on complex phenotypes, no model has been available to examine how gene actions and interactions alter the ontogenetic development of an organism and transform the altered ontogeny into descendants. In this article, we present a novel statistical model for mapping quantitative trait loci (QTL) determining the developmental process of complex traits. Our model is constructed within the traditional maximum-likelihood framework implemented with the EM algorithm. We employ biologically meaningful growth curve equations to model time-specific expected genetic values and the AR(1) model to structure the residual variance-covariance matrix among different time points. Because of a reduced number of parameters being estimated and the incorporation of biological principles, the new model displays increased statistical power to detect QTL exerting an effect on the shape of ontogenetic growth and development. The model allows for the tests of a number of biological hypotheses regarding the role of epistasis in determining biological growth, form, and shape and for the resolution of developmental problems at the interface with evolution. Using our newly developed model, we have successfully detected significant additive × additive epistatic effects on stem height growth trajectories in a forest tree.

[1]  L. Bertalanffy Quantitative Laws in Metabolism and Growth , 1957 .

[2]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[3]  D. Wake,et al.  Size and shape in ontogeny and phylogeny , 1979, Paleobiology.

[4]  W. Atchley,et al.  QUANTITATIVE GENETICS OF DEVELOPMENT: GENETIC CORRELATIONS AMONG AGE‐SPECIFIC TRAIT VALUES AND THE EVOLUTION OF ONTOGENY , 1983, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[5]  William R. Atchley,et al.  Ontogeny, Timing of Development, and Genetic Variance-Covariances Structure , 1984, The American Naturalist.

[6]  David Ruppert,et al.  Power Transformations When Fitting Theoretical Models to Data , 1984 .

[7]  J. Murray,et al.  The Evolutionary Process , 1985 .

[8]  M. Kirkpatrick,et al.  A quantitative genetic model for growth, shape, reaction norms, and other infinite-dimensional characters , 1989, Journal of mathematical biology.

[9]  E. Lander,et al.  Mapping mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps. , 1989, Genetics.

[10]  M. Kirkpatrick,et al.  Analysis of the inheritance, selection and evolution of growth trajectories. , 1990, Genetics.

[11]  Quantitative genetics of yield breeding for Populus short rotation culture. I. Dynamics of genetic control and selection model of yield traits , 1992 .

[12]  R. Sederoff,et al.  Genetic linkage maps of Eucalyptus grandis and Eucalyptus urophylla using a pseudo-testcross: mapping strategy and RAPD markers. , 1994, Genetics.

[13]  Karl J. Niklas,et al.  Botanical Scaling. (Book Reviews: Plant Allometry. The Scaling of Form and Process.) , 1994 .

[14]  W. G. Hill,et al.  Estimating the covariance structure of traits during growth and ageing, illustrated with lactation in dairy cattle. , 1994, Genetical research.

[15]  R. Doerge,et al.  Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mapping. , 1994, Genetics.

[16]  J. Cheverud,et al.  Epistasis and its contribution to genetic variance components. , 1995, Genetics.

[17]  L. Skovgaard NONLINEAR MODELS FOR REPEATED MEASUREMENT DATA. , 1996 .

[18]  M. Lynch,et al.  Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits , 1996 .

[19]  Vicente Núñez-Antón Longitudinal data analysis: non‐stationary error structures and antedependent models , 1997 .

[20]  S. Rice,et al.  The analysis of ontogenetic trajectories: when a change in size or shape is not heterochrony. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  W. Atchley,et al.  Developmental quantitative genetics, conditional epigenetic variability and growth in mice. , 1997, Genetics.

[22]  J. Cheverud,et al.  Mapping quantitative trait loci for murine growth: a closer look at genetic architecture. , 1999, Genetical research.

[23]  C. Geyer,et al.  The genetic analysis of age-dependent traits: modeling the character process. , 1999, Genetics.

[24]  M. Wade,et al.  Epistasis and the Evolutionary Process , 2000 .

[25]  D. Zimmerman,et al.  Modeling Nonstationary Longitudinal Data , 2000, Biometrics.

[26]  Rudolf A. Raff,et al.  Evo-devo: the evolution of a new discipline , 2000, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[27]  James H. Brown,et al.  A general model for ontogenetic growth , 2001, Nature.

[28]  A. Korol,et al.  Enhanced efficiency of quantitative trait loci mapping analysis based on multivariate complexes of quantitative traits. , 2001, Genetics.

[29]  A. Rougvie Control of developmental timing in animals , 2001, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[30]  Rongling Wu,et al.  Molecular linkage maps of the Populus genome. , 2002, Genome.

[31]  G. Casella,et al.  Functional mapping of quantitative trait loci underlying the character process: a theoretical framework. , 2002, Genetics.

[32]  Rongling Wu,et al.  A logistic mixture model for characterizing genetic determinants causing differentiation in growth trajectories. , 2002, Genetical research.

[33]  W. Arthur,et al.  The emerging conceptual framework of evolutionary developmental biology , 2002, Nature.

[34]  Rongling Wu,et al.  A haplotype-based algorithm for multilocus linkage disequilibrium mapping of quantitative trait loci with epistasis. , 2003, Genetics.

[35]  Rongling Wu,et al.  Quantitative trait loci for growth trajectories in Populus. , 2003, Genetical research.

[36]  Rongling Wu,et al.  A general statistical framework for mapping quantitative trait loci in nonmodel systems: issue for characterizing linkage phases. , 2003, Genetics.

[37]  Wei Zhao,et al.  Functional mapping for quantitative trait loci governing growth rates: a parametric model. , 2003, Physiological genomics.

[38]  S. Kerje,et al.  A global search reveals epistatic interaction between QTL for early growth in the chicken. , 2003, Genome research.

[39]  R. L. Wu,et al.  Detecting epistatic genetic variance with a clonally replicated design: models for lowvs high-order nonallelic interaction , 1996, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[40]  G. Casella,et al.  Functional Mapping of Quantitative Trait Loci Underlying Growth Trajectories Using a Transform‐Both‐Sides Logistic Model , 2004, Biometrics.