Identifying associations among sterile oat (Avena sterilis) infestation level, landscape characteristics, and crop yields

Abstract Information on weed spatial distribution could improve weed management decisions. Herbicide use could be reduced if applied only to field zones with an infestation level higher than a specific economic threshold. In this study, we surveyed 31 winter barley fields in different regions of Spain to describe the spatial distribution of sterile oat and to analyze the relationship between sterile oat infestation level and landscape and crop yield attributes. Elevation and slope angle, crop yield and slope aspect were the main factors in order of importance in explaining the distribution of sterile oat. In general, greater infestation levels were observed in flat lowland and concave landscapes, with a low crop yield, and on northern exposures (when slope ≥ 2%). We could define field zones with a higher risk (> 6 times probability) of having sterile oat problems. High-probability zones, defined by topographic attributes alone, occupied 24% of the total area and contained 46% of the high infestation levels, whereas zones defined by topographic and crop yield attributes constituted 14% of the total area and contained 31% of the infestation. Nomenclature: Sterile oat, Avena sterilis L. AVEST; barley, Hordeum vulgare L.

[1]  R. Clarke,et al.  Theory and Applications of Correspondence Analysis , 1985 .

[2]  Dan Pennock,et al.  Landform classification and soil distribution in hummocky terrain , 1987 .

[3]  J. Cuevas,et al.  Grassy weeds in winter cereals in Southern Spain. , 1989 .

[4]  F. Forcella,et al.  value of Managing Within-Field Variability , 1993 .

[5]  J. Cardina,et al.  The nature and consequence of weed spatial distribution , 1997, Weed Science.

[6]  Paul E. Gessler,et al.  Modeling Soil–Landscape and Ecosystem Properties Using Terrain Attributes , 2000 .

[7]  David Lamb,et al.  PA—Precision Agriculture: Remote-Sensing and Mapping of Weeds in Crops , 2001 .

[8]  Lisa J. Rew,et al.  Spatial distribution of weeds in arable crops: are current sampling and analytical methods appropriate? , 2001 .

[9]  C. Fernández-Quintanilla,et al.  Associations among soil propertíes and winter Wild oat (Avena sterilis L.) abundance in cereal fields , 2002 .

[10]  J. Poesen,et al.  Simulation of the redistribution of soil by tillage on complex topographies , 2003 .

[11]  S. Christensen,et al.  Real‐time weed detection, decision making and patch spraying in maize, sugarbeet, winter wheat and winter barley , 2003 .

[12]  H. Steinmann,et al.  Secondary dispersal, spatial dynamics and effects of herbicides on reproductive capacity of a recently introduced population of Bromus sterilis in an arable field , 2004 .

[13]  D. Mortensen,et al.  Environmental characteristics affecting Helianthus annuus distribution in a maize production system , 2005 .

[14]  Angela Ribeiro,et al.  Comparison of sampling methodologies for site‐specific management of Avena sterilis , 2005 .

[15]  César Fernández-Quintanilla,et al.  Wild oat (Avena sterilis L.) competition with winter barley : plant density effects , 2006 .

[16]  César Fernández-Quintanilla,et al.  Dispersal of Avena fatua and Avena sterilis patches by natural dissemination, soil tillage and combine harvesters , 2006 .

[17]  César Fernández-Quintanilla,et al.  Assessing the opportunity for site‐specific management of Avena sterilis in winter barley fields in Spain , 2006 .