Bacterial community structures are unique and resilient in full-scale bioenergy systems

Anaerobic digestion is the most successful bioenergy technology worldwide with, at its core, undefined microbial communities that have poorly understood dynamics. Here, we investigated the relationships of bacterial community structure (>400,000 16S rRNA gene sequences for 112 samples) with function (i.e., bioreactor performance) and environment (i.e., operating conditions) in a yearlong monthly time series of nine full-scale bioreactor facilities treating brewery wastewater (>20,000 measurements). Each of the nine facilities had a unique community structure with an unprecedented level of stability. Using machine learning, we identified a small subset of operational taxonomic units (OTUs; 145 out of 4,962), which predicted the location of the facility of origin for almost every sample (96.4% accuracy). Of these 145 OTUs, syntrophic bacteria were systematically overrepresented, demonstrating that syntrophs rebounded following disturbances. This indicates that resilience, rather than dynamic competition, played an important role in maintaining the necessary syntrophic populations. In addition, we explained the observed phylogenetic differences between all samples on the basis of a subset of environmental gradients (using constrained ordination) and found stronger relationships between community structure and its function rather than its environment. These relationships were strongest for two performance variables—methanogenic activity and substrate removal efficiency—both of which were also affected by microbial ecology because these variables were correlated with community evenness (at any given time) and variability in phylogenetic structure (over time), respectively. Thus, we quantified relationships between community structure and function, which opens the door to engineer communities with superior functions.

[1]  E. Roden,et al.  Dissimilatory Fe(III) Reduction by the Marine Microorganism Desulfuromonas acetoxidans , 1993, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[2]  Suiying Huang,et al.  How Stable Is Stable? Function versus Community Composition , 1999, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[3]  Pierre Legendre,et al.  DISTANCE‐BASED REDUNDANCY ANALYSIS: TESTING MULTISPECIES RESPONSES IN MULTIFACTORIAL ECOLOGICAL EXPERIMENTS , 1999 .

[4]  Craig S. Criddle,et al.  Parallel Processing of Substrate Correlates with Greater Functional Stability in Methanogenic Bioreactor Communities Perturbed by Glucose , 2000, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[5]  R. Moletta,et al.  Examination of two years of community dynamics in an anaerobic bioreactor using fluorescence polymerase chain reaction (PCR) single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis. , 2000, Environmental microbiology.

[6]  K. McMahon,et al.  Anaerobic codigestion of municipal solid waste and biosolids under various mixing conditions--II: Microbial population dynamics. , 2001, Water research.

[7]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Diagnosis of multiple cancer types by shrunken centroids of gene expression , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  C. Nakatsu,et al.  Stability of the bacterial communities supported by a seven-stage biological process treating pharmaceutical wastewater as revealed by PCR-DGGE. , 2002, Water research.

[9]  D. Stahl,et al.  Molecular Characterization of Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria in the Guaymas Basin , 2003, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[10]  D. Graham,et al.  Theoretical ecology for engineering biology. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[11]  L. Raskin,et al.  Diversity and dynamics of microbial communities in engineered environments and their implications for process stability. , 2003, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[12]  Marti J. Anderson,et al.  CANONICAL ANALYSIS OF PRINCIPAL COORDINATES: A USEFUL METHOD OF CONSTRAINED ORDINATION FOR ECOLOGY , 2003 .

[13]  G. Lettinga,et al.  Anaerobic digestion and wastewater treatment systems , 2004, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek.

[14]  L. T. Angenent,et al.  Production of bioenergy and biochemicals from industrial and agricultural wastewater. , 2004, Trends in biotechnology.

[15]  R. Knight,et al.  UniFrac: a New Phylogenetic Method for Comparing Microbial Communities , 2005, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[16]  Eoin L. Brodie,et al.  Greengenes, a Chimera-Checked 16S rRNA Gene Database and Workbench Compatible with ARB , 2006, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[17]  G. Narasimhan,et al.  An eco-informatics tool for microbial community studies: supervised classification of Amplicon Length Heterogeneity (ALH) profiles of 16S rRNA. , 2006, Journal of microbiological methods.

[18]  Grietje Zeeman,et al.  The effects of operational and environmental variations on anaerobic wastewater treatment systems: a review. , 2006, Bioresource technology.

[19]  Masaharu Ishii,et al.  Dynamic Transition of a Methanogenic Population in Response to the Concentration of Volatile Fatty Acids in a Thermophilic Anaerobic Digester , 2006, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[20]  F. Bushman,et al.  Short pyrosequencing reads suffice for accurate microbial community analysis , 2007, Nucleic acids research.

[21]  J. Tiedje,et al.  Naïve Bayesian Classifier for Rapid Assignment of rRNA Sequences into the New Bacterial Taxonomy , 2007, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[22]  S. Allison,et al.  Resistance, resilience, and redundancy in microbial communities , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  P. Illmer,et al.  Ability of DNA content and DGGE analysis to reflect the performance condition of an anaerobic biowaste fermenter. , 2008, Microbiological research.

[24]  R. Knight,et al.  Error-correcting barcoded primers for pyrosequencing hundreds of samples in multiplex , 2008, Nature Methods.

[25]  W. Verstraete,et al.  Initial community evenness favours functionality under selective stress , 2009, Nature.

[26]  R. Gunsalus,et al.  Syntrophy in anaerobic global carbon cycles. , 2009, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[27]  E. Pelletier,et al.  Towards the definition of a core of microorganisms involved in anaerobic digestion of sludge , 2009, The ISME Journal.

[28]  H. Insam,et al.  Effect of Biowaste Sludge Maturation on the Diversity of Thermophilic Bacteria and Archaea in an Anaerobic Reactor , 2009, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[29]  Martin Hartmann,et al.  Introducing mothur: Open-Source, Platform-Independent, Community-Supported Software for Describing and Comparing Microbial Communities , 2009, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[30]  M. Ferrer,et al.  Systems approaches to microbial communities and their functioning. , 2010, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[31]  Rob Knight,et al.  PyNAST: a flexible tool for aligning sequences to a template alignment , 2009, Bioinform..

[32]  William A. Walters,et al.  QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data , 2010, Nature Methods.

[33]  Paramvir S. Dehal,et al.  FastTree 2 – Approximately Maximum-Likelihood Trees for Large Alignments , 2010, PloS one.