Analysis of image color and effective bandwidth as a tool for assessing air pollution at urban spatiotemporal scale

Size and concentration of airborne particulate matter (PM) are important indicators of air pollution events and public health risks. It is therefore important to monitor size resolved PM concentrations in the ambient air. This task, however, is hindered by the highly dynamic spatiotemporal variations of the PM concentrations. Satellite remote sensing is a common approach for gathering spatiotemporal data regarding aerosol events but its current spatial resolution is limited to a large grid that does not fit high varying urban areas. Moreover, satellite-borne remote sensing has limited revisit periods and it measures along vertical atmospheric columns. Thus, linking satellite-borne aerosol products to ground PM measurements is extremely challenging. In the last two decades visibility analysis is used by the US Environmental Protection Agency (US-EPA) to obtain quantitative representation of air quality in rural areas by horizontal imaging. However, significantly fewer efforts have been given to utilize the acquired scene characteristics (color, contrast, etc.) for quantitative parametric modeling of PM concentrations. We suggest utilizing the image effective bandwidth, a quantitative measure of image characteristics, for predicting PM concentrations. For validating the suggested method, we have assembled a large dataset that consists of time series imaging as well as measurements from air quality monitoring stations located in the study area that report PM concentrations and meteorological data (wind direction and velocity, relative humidity, etc.). Quantitative and qualitative statistical evaluation of the suggested method shows that dynamic changes of PM concentrations can be inferred from the acquired images.

[1]  Shawn D. Newsam,et al.  Using visibility cameras to estimate atmospheric light extinction , 2011, 2011 IEEE Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV).

[2]  D. Dockery,et al.  Health Effects of Fine Particulate Air Pollution: Lines that Connect , 2006, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[3]  Y. J. Kim,et al.  Vertical distribution of atmospheric aerosol size distribution over south-central New Mexico , 1993 .

[4]  K. T. Whitby,et al.  California aerosols - their physical and chemical characteristics , 1980 .

[5]  Lorraine Remer,et al.  A Critical Look at Deriving Monthly Aerosol Optical Depth From Satellite Data , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[6]  Basil W. Coutant,et al.  Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of MODIS satellite sensor data for regional and urban scale air quality , 2004 .

[7]  D. Broday,et al.  Urban-scale variability of ambient particulate matter attributes , 2006 .

[8]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[9]  Teruyuki Nakajima,et al.  Tropospheric aerosol optical thickness from the GOCART model and comparisons with satellite and sun photometer measurements , 2002 .

[10]  Thrasyvoulos N. Pappas,et al.  Perceptual criteria for image quality evaluation , 2005 .

[11]  Soon-Ung Park,et al.  Aerosol size distributions observed at the Seoul National University campus in Korea during the Asian dust and non-Asian dust periods , 2006 .

[12]  T. Jarmer,et al.  Night-Time Ground Hyperspectral Imaging for Urban-Scale Remote Sensing of Ambient PM. I. Aerosol Optical Thickness Acquisition , 2012 .

[13]  Patricia Ladret,et al.  The blur effect: perception and estimation with a new no-reference perceptual blur metric , 2007, Electronic Imaging.

[14]  W. Steen Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles , 1999 .

[15]  J. Schwartz,et al.  Reduction in fine particulate air pollution and mortality: Extended follow-up of the Harvard Six Cities study. , 2006, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[16]  Barak Fishbain,et al.  No-reference method for image effective bandwidth estimation , 2008, Electronic Imaging.

[17]  Arthur T. DeGaetano,et al.  Temporal, spatial and meteorological variations in hourly PM2.5 concentration extremes in New York City , 2004 .

[18]  Kerrie Mengersen,et al.  Modality in ambient particle size distributions and its potential as a basis for developing air quality regulation , 2008 .

[19]  A. Bovik,et al.  A universal image quality index , 2002, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[20]  A. Kokhanovsky,et al.  Aerosol remote sensing over land: A comparison of satellite retrievals using different algorithms and instruments , 2007, Atmospheric Research.

[21]  Alexander Smirnov,et al.  Development of a Global Validation Package for Satellite Oceanic Aerosol Optical Thickness Retrieval Based on AERONET Observations and Its Application to NOAA/NESDIS Operational Aerosol Retrievals. , 2002 .

[22]  Gregory W. Kauffman,et al.  Pattern recognition analysis of optical sensor array data to detect nitroaromatic compound vapors , 2001 .

[23]  Paul S. Fisher,et al.  Image quality measures and their performance , 1995, IEEE Trans. Commun..