Influence of three-dimensional vision on surgical telemanipulator performance

Background: Different viewing conditions (two- and three-dimensional National Television Standard Committee [2D-NTSC and 3D-NTSC] and two-dimensional high-definition television [2D-HDTV]) on telemanipulator performance were evaluated. Methods: Six taskes were performed by 15 endoscopic surgeons using the daVinci telemanipulation system. Performance time and errors were measured. Encoder data from the system were used for kinematic analysis of motion. A self-evaluation questionnaire regarding performance under various viewing conditions was obtained. Results: Resolution was better with 2D-HDTV. The estimate of relative distance was not influenced by the different visualization systems. Motor skill tasks were performed faster with binocular vision (3D-NTSC) than with monocular vision (2D-NTSC, 2D-HDTV). For both 2D settings, the deceleration phase of motion was prolonged (p < 0.05 vs 3D). Peak velocity was reduced with 2D-HDTV as compared with 3D-NTSC (p = 0.01). The surgeons tended to favor the 3D system despite their use of 2D systems in their own practice. Conclusions: Three-dimensional vision enhances telemanipulator performance as compared with a 2D system at the same or higher level of resolution. Because it allows faster and more precise movement, future surgical systems should focus on 3D visualization.

[1]  C. Foxcroft,et al.  Are Visual-Perceptual and Visual-Motor Skills Separate Abilities? , 1988, Perceptual and motor skills.

[2]  L Frisén,et al.  Binocular summation in humans: evidence for a hierarchic model. , 1988, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  M. Goodale,et al.  Separate visual pathways for perception and action , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[4]  Melvyn A. Goodale,et al.  The role of binocular vision in prehension: a kinematic analysis , 1992, Vision Research.

[5]  B. Davies,et al.  Robotic surgery , 1993, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[6]  A Arditi,et al.  Binocular enhancement of visual acuity. , 1993, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[7]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  Separate neural pathways for the visual analysis of object shape in perception and prehension , 1994, Current Biology.

[8]  J. Rabin,et al.  Two eyes are better than one: binocular enhancement in the contrast domain , 1995, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[9]  D. Jones,et al.  The influence of three-dimensional video systems on laparoscopic task performance. , 1996, Surgical laparoscopy & endoscopy.

[10]  K. Hoffmann,et al.  Visual Inspection of Three-Dimensional Objects by Human Observers , 1996, Perception.

[11]  Klaus Radermacher,et al.  Stereoscopic Visualization in Endoscopic Surgery: Problems, Benefits, and Potentials , 1997, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[12]  A. Li,et al.  Comparison of two-dimensional vs three-dimensional camera systems in laparoscopic surgery , 1997, Surgical Endoscopy.

[13]  Y. Dion,et al.  Visual integration of data and basic motor skills under laparoscopy , 1997, Surgical Endoscopy.

[14]  A. Cuschieri,et al.  Randomised study of influence of two-dimensional versus three-dimensional imaging on performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy , 1998, The Lancet.

[15]  Martina Ziefle,et al.  Effects of Display Resolution on Visual Performance , 1998, Hum. Factors.

[16]  A. Yim Minimal Access Cardiothoracic Surgery , 2000 .

[17]  F. Mohr,et al.  Total endoscopic computer enhanced coronary artery bypass grafting. , 2000, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[18]  P. Servos Distance estimation in the visual and visuomotor systems , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.