Spatial capture-recapture model performance with known small-mammal densities.

Abundance and density of wild animals are important ecological metrics. However, estimating either is fraught with challenges; spatial capture-recapture (SCR) models are a relatively new class of models that attempt to ameliorate common challenges, providing a statistically coherent framework to estimate abundance and density. SCR models are increasingly being used in ecological and conservation studies of mammals worldwide, but have received little testing with empirical field data. We use data collected via a web and grid sampling design to evaluate the basic SCR model where small-mammal abundance (N) and density (D) are known (via exhaustive sampling). We fit the basic SCR model with and without a behavioral effect to 11 small-mammal populations for each sampling design using a Bayesian and likelihood SCR modeling approach. We compare SCR and ad hoc density estimators using frequentist performance measures. We found Bayesian and likelihood SCR estimates of density (D) and abundance (N) to be similar. We also found SCR models to have moderately poor frequentist coverage of D and N (45-73%), high deviation from truth (i.e., accuracy; D, 17-29%; N, 16-29%), and consistent negative bias across inferential paradigms, sampling designs, and models. With the trapping grid data, the basic SCR model generally performed more poorly than the best ad hoc estimator (behavior CR super-population estimate divided by the full mean maximum distance moved estimate of the effective trapping area), whereas with the trapping web data, the best-performing SCR model (null) was comparable to the best distance model. Relatively poor frequentist SCR coverage resulted from higher precision (SCR coefficients of variation [CVs] < ad hoc CVs); however D and D were fairly well correlated (r2 range of 0.77-0.96). SCR's negative relative bias (i.e., average underestimation of the true density) suggests additional heterogeneity in detection and/or that small mammals maintained asymmetric home ranges. We suggest caution in the use of the basic SCR model when trapping animals in a sampling grid and more generally when small sample sizes necessitate the spatial scale parameter (σ) apply to all individuals. When possible, researchers should consider variation in detection and incorporate individual biological and/or ecological variation at the trap level when modeling σ.

[1]  Brian D. Gerber,et al.  The impact of forest logging and fragmentation on carnivore species composition, density and occupancy in Madagascar's rainforests , 2012, Oryx.

[2]  Len Thomas,et al.  Spatially explicit capture–recapture methods to estimate minke whale density from data collected at bottom-mounted hydrophones , 2010, Journal of Ornithology.

[3]  Rob Slotow,et al.  Evaluating Methods for Counting Cryptic Carnivores , 2009 .

[4]  Christopher J. Kyle,et al.  Empirical comparison of density estimators for large carnivores , 2010 .

[5]  D. Rubin,et al.  Inference from Iterative Simulation Using Multiple Sequences , 1992 .

[6]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  Parameter-expanded data augmentation for Bayesian analysis of capture–recapture models , 2010, Journal of Ornithology.

[7]  W. Briggs.  Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences , 2007 .

[8]  J Andrew Royle,et al.  Use of Spatial Capture‐Recapture Modeling and DNA Data to Estimate Densities of Elusive Animals , 2010, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[9]  Christopher J. Kyle,et al.  Combining data from 43 standardized surveys to estimate densities of female American black bears by spatially explicit capture–recapture , 2013, Population Ecology.

[10]  Joseph G. Ibrahim,et al.  Monte Carlo Methods in Bayesian Computation , 2000 .

[11]  John A. Nelder,et al.  A Simplex Method for Function Minimization , 1965, Comput. J..

[12]  S. Buckland.  Introduction to distance sampling : estimating abundance of biological populations , 2001 .

[13]  J Andrew Royle,et al.  Spatial capture--recapture models for jointly estimating population density and landscape connectivity. , 2013, Ecology.

[14]  S. Pledger.  Unified Maximum Likelihood Estimates for Closed Capture–Recapture Models Using Mixtures , 2000, Biometrics.

[15]  David L. Borchers,et al.  Density Estimation by Spatially Explicit Capture–Recapture: Likelihood-Based Methods , 2009 .

[16]  Jerrold L. Belant,et al.  How Does Spatial Study Design Influence Density Estimates from Spatial Capture-Recapture Models? , 2012, PloS one.

[17]  D L Borchers,et al.  Spatially Explicit Maximum Likelihood Methods for Capture–Recapture Studies , 2008, Biometrics.

[18]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Evaluation of Two Density Estimators of Small Mammal Population Size , 1985 .

[19]  Jacob S. Ivan,et al.  Estimating the abundance of rare and elusive carnivores from photographic-sampling data when the population size is very small , 2014, Population Ecology.

[20]  Mathias W. Tobler,et al.  Estimating jaguar densities with camera traps: Problems with current designs and recommendations for future studies , 2013 .

[21]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Capture-Recapture and Removal Methods for Sampling Closed Populations , 1983 .

[22]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  A Framework for Inference About Carnivore Density From Unstructured Spatial Sampling of Scat Using Detector Dogs , 2012 .

[23]  Donald G. Reid,et al.  Fluctuations in lemming populations in north Yukon, Canada, 2007―2010 , 2011 .

[24]  Lee R. Dice,et al.  Some Census Methods for Mammals , 1938 .

[25]  Gary C. White,et al.  Analysis of Wildlife Radio-Tracking Data , 1990 .

[26]  Rahel Sollmann,et al.  Improving density estimates for elusive carnivores: Accounting for sex-specific detection and movements using spatial capture–recapture models for jaguars in central Brazil , 2011 .

[27]  Søren Bondrup-Nielsen,et al.  Density estimation as a function of live-trapping grid and home range size , 1983 .

[28]  William A Link,et al.  A cautionary note on the discrete uniform prior for the binomial N. , 2013, Ecology.

[29]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Small-mammal density estimation: A field comparison of grid-based vs. web-based density estimators , 2003 .

[30]  William L. Kendall,et al.  ROBUSTNESS OF CLOSED CAPTURE-RECAPTURE METHODS TO VIOLATIONS OF THE CLOSURE ASSUMPTION , 1999 .

[31]  M. Conroy,et al.  Modeling demographic processes in marked populations , 2009 .

[32]  Rachel M. Fewster,et al.  Estimating population size by spatially explicit capture–recapture , 2013 .

[33]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  Spatial Capture-Recapture , 2013 .

[34]  Brian D. Gerber,et al.  Evaluating the potential biases in carnivore capture–recapture studies associated with the use of lure and varying density estimation techniques using photographic-sampling data of the Malagasy civet , 2011, Population Ecology.

[35]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Statistical inference from capture data on closed animal populations , 1980 .

[36]  Qamar Qureshi,et al.  Evaluating capture–recapture population and density estimation of tigers in a population with known parameters , 2010 .

[37]  Murray G Efford,et al.  Estimation of population density by spatially explicit capture-recapture analysis of data from area searches. , 2011, Ecology.

[38]  Allan F. O'Connell,et al.  Comparison of density estimation methods for mammal populations with camera traps in the Kaa‐Iya del Gran Chaco landscape , 2012 .

[39]  Andrew Gelman,et al.  Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models , 2006 .

[40]  Linda Vigilant,et al.  A population estimate of chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) in the Ugalla region using standard and spatially explicit genetic capture–recapture methods , 2014, American journal of primatology.

[41]  Eric Marboutin,et al.  Abundance of rare and elusive species: Empirical investigation of closed versus spatially explicit capture–recapture models with lynx as a case study† , 2013 .

[42]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  Integrating resource selection information with spatial capture–recapture , 2012, Methods in Ecology and Evolution.

[43]  Jacob S. Ivan,et al.  Using simulation to compare methods for estimating density from capture–recapture data , 2013 .

[44]  E. Revilla,et al.  A movement ecology paradigm for unifying organismal movement research , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[45]  Margaret F. Kinnaird,et al.  Density estimation of sympatric carnivores using spatially explicit capture–recapture methods and standard trapping grid , 2011 .

[46]  James D. Nichols,et al.  Capture-recapture models. , 1992 .