A Bimodal Distribution of Two Distinct Categories of Intrinsically Disordered Structures with Separate Functions in FG Nucleoporins*

Nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) gate the only conduits for nucleocytoplasmic transport in eukaryotes. Their gate is formed by nucleoporins containing large intrinsically disordered domains with multiple phenylalanine-glycine repeats (FG domains). In combination, these are hypothesized to form a structurally and chemically homogeneous network of random coils at the NPC center, which sorts macromolecules by size and hydrophobicity. Instead, we found that FG domains are structurally and chemically heterogeneous. They adopt distinct categories of intrinsically disordered structures in non-random distributions. Some adopt globular, collapsed coil configurations and are characterized by a low charge content. Others are highly charged and adopt more dynamic, extended coil conformations. Interestingly, several FG nucleoporins feature both types of structures in a bimodal distribution along their polypeptide chain. This distribution functionally correlates with the attractive or repulsive character of their interactions with collapsed coil FG domains displaying cohesion toward one another and extended coil FG domains displaying repulsion. Topologically, these bipartite FG domains may resemble sticky molten globules connected to the tip of relaxed or extended coils. Within the NPC, the crowding of FG nucleoporins and the segregation of their disordered structures based on their topology, dimensions, and cohesive character could force the FG domains to form a tubular gate structure or transporter at the NPC center featuring two separate zones of traffic with distinct physicochemical properties.

[1]  J. García de la Torre,et al.  Hydrodynamic properties of complex, rigid, biological macromolecules: theory and applications , 1981, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[2]  R. Milligan,et al.  A large particle associated with the perimeter of the nuclear pore complex , 1982, The Journal of cell biology.

[3]  R. Peters Nucleo‐cytoplasmic flux and intracellular mobility in single hepatocytes measured by fluorescence microphotolysis. , 1984, The EMBO journal.

[4]  C. Feldherr,et al.  Movement of a karyophilic protein through the nuclear pores of oocytes , 1984, The Journal of cell biology.

[5]  C. Feldherr,et al.  Translocation of RNA-coated gold particles through the nuclear pores of oocytes , 1988, The Journal of cell biology.

[6]  D. Goldfarb,et al.  Protein import through the nuclear pore complex is a multistep process , 1989, The Journal of cell biology.

[7]  C. Akey,et al.  Interactions and structure of the nuclear pore complex revealed by cryo- electron microscopy , 1989, The Journal of cell biology.

[8]  C. Akey Visualization of transport-related configurations of the nuclear pore transporter. , 1990, Biophysical journal.

[9]  V. Saudek,et al.  Gradient-tailored excitation for single-quantum NMR spectroscopy of aqueous solutions , 1992, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[10]  M. Radermacher,et al.  Architecture of the Xenopus nuclear pore complex revealed by three- dimensional cryo-electron microscopy , 1993, The Journal of cell biology.

[11]  C. Akey Structural plasticity of the nuclear pore complex. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[12]  J. Hsu Multiple Comparisons: Theory and Methods , 1996 .

[13]  V. Krishnan,et al.  Determination of Oligomeric State of Proteins in Solution from Pulsed-Field-Gradient Self-Diffusion Coefficient Measurements. A Comparison of Experimental, Theoretical, and Hard-Sphere Approximated Values , 1997 .

[14]  C. Feldherr,et al.  The location of the transport gate in the nuclear pore complex. , 1997, Journal of cell science.

[15]  I. Solovei,et al.  Nuclear pore complex structure in birds. , 1997, Journal of structural biology.

[16]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Three-dimensional visualization of the route of protein import: the role of nuclear pore complex substructures. , 1997, Experimental cell research.

[17]  B. Daneholt A Look at Messenger RNP Moving through the Nuclear Pore , 1997, Cell.

[18]  V. Krishnan,et al.  An empirical relationship between rotational correlation time and solvent accessible surface area , 1998, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[19]  C. Akey,et al.  Three-dimensional architecture of the isolated yeast nuclear pore complex: functional and evolutionary implications. , 1998, Molecular cell.

[20]  C. Akey,et al.  Active nuclear pore complexes in Chironomus: visualization of transporter configurations related to mRNP export. , 1998, Journal of cell science.

[21]  J. Aitchison,et al.  Specific Binding of the Karyopherin Kap121p to a Subunit of the Nuclear Pore Complex Containing Nup53p, Nup59p, and Nup170p , 1998, The Journal of cell biology.

[22]  R. Peters,et al.  Permeability of single nuclear pores. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[23]  V. Krishnan,et al.  An improved experimental scheme to measure self-diffusion coefficients of biomolecules with an advantageous use of radiation damping , 1999 .

[24]  V. Uversky Intrinsically Disordered Proteins , 2000 .

[25]  B. Chait,et al.  The Yeast Nuclear Pore Complex: Composition, Architecture, and Transport Mechanism , 2000 .

[26]  V. Uversky,et al.  Why are “natively unfolded” proteins unstructured under physiologic conditions? , 2000, Proteins.

[27]  J. Aitchison,et al.  A Link between the Synthesis of Nucleoporins and the Biogenesis of the Nuclear Envelope , 2001, The Journal of cell biology.

[28]  A. Burlingame,et al.  Proteomic Analysis of Nucleoporin Interacting Proteins* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[29]  Christopher J. Oldfield,et al.  Intrinsically disordered protein. , 2001, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[30]  J. Hoh,et al.  Predicting properties of intrinsically unstructured proteins. , 2001, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[31]  A. Burlingame,et al.  The nucleoporin Nup60p functions as a Gsp1p–GTP-sensitive tether for Nup2p at the nuclear pore complex , 2001, The Journal of cell biology.

[32]  N. Pante,et al.  Nuclear pore complex is able to transport macromolecules with diameters of about 39 nm. , 2002, Molecular biology of the cell.

[33]  V. Uversky,et al.  The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Nucleoporin Nup2p Is a Natively Unfolded Protein* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[34]  D. Görlich,et al.  The permeability barrier of nuclear pore complexes appears to operate via hydrophobic exclusion , 2002, The EMBO journal.

[35]  Richard Bayliss,et al.  Structural basis for the interaction between NTF2 and nucleoporin FxFG repeats , 2002, The EMBO journal.

[36]  V. Uversky Natively unfolded proteins: A point where biology waits for physics , 2002, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[37]  Robert J Chalkley,et al.  Deciphering Networks of Protein Interactions at the Nuclear Pore Complex* , 2002, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[38]  T. Littlewood,et al.  GLFG and FxFG Nucleoporins Bind to Overlapping Sites on Importin-β* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[39]  B. Chait,et al.  Proteomic analysis of the mammalian nuclear pore complex , 2002, The Journal of cell biology.

[40]  P. Schwarzmaier,et al.  Importins fulfil a dual function as nuclear import receptors and cytoplasmic chaperones for exposed basic domains , 2002, The EMBO journal.

[41]  Peter R Baker,et al.  The Identification of Protein-Protein Interactions of the Nuclear Pore Complex of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Using High Throughput Matrix-assisted Laser Desorption Ionization Time-of-Flight Tandem Mass Spectrometry* , 2002, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[42]  P. Tompa Intrinsically unstructured proteins evolve by repeat expansion , 2003, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[43]  V. Uversky,et al.  Disorder in the nuclear pore complex: The FG repeat regions of nucleoporins are natively unfolded , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  Ueli Aebi,et al.  The nuclear pore complex: nucleocytoplasmic transport and beyond , 2003, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[45]  V. Uversky,et al.  Protein folding revisited. A polypeptide chain at the folding – misfolding – nonfolding cross-roads: which way to go? , 2003, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences CMLS.

[46]  V. Uversky,et al.  Biophysical constraints for protein structure prediction. , 2003, Journal of proteome research.

[47]  John D. Aitchison,et al.  Cell Cycle Regulated Transport Controlled by Alterations in the Nuclear Pore Complex , 2003, Cell.

[48]  Ueli Aebi,et al.  Cryo-electron tomography provides novel insights into nuclear pore architecture: implications for nucleocytoplasmic transport. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[49]  M. Magnasco,et al.  Virtual gating and nuclear transport: the hole picture. , 2003, Trends in cell biology.

[50]  S. Osmani,et al.  Partial Nuclear Pore Complex Disassembly during Closed Mitosis in Aspergillus nidulans , 2004, Current Biology.

[51]  F. Förster,et al.  Nuclear Pore Complex Structure and Dynamics Revealed by Cryoelectron Tomography , 2004, Science.

[52]  Y. Rabin,et al.  Metastable network model of protein transport through nuclear pores. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[53]  D. Svergun,et al.  Conformational Variability of Nucleo-cytoplasmic Transport Factors* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[54]  E. Kiseleva,et al.  Yeast nuclear pore complexes have a cytoplasmic ring and internal filaments. , 2004, Journal of structural biology.

[55]  D. Goldfarb,et al.  Minimal nuclear pore complexes define FG repeat domains essential for transport , 2004, Nature Cell Biology.

[56]  H. Dyson,et al.  Intrinsically unstructured proteins and their functions , 2005, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[57]  G. Blobel,et al.  Karyopherin-mediated import of integral inner nuclear membrane proteins , 2006, Nature.

[58]  Ralf P. Richter,et al.  FG-Rich Repeats of Nuclear Pore Proteins Form a Three-Dimensional Meshwork with Hydrogel-Like Properties , 2006, Science.

[59]  Hoang T. Tran,et al.  Toward an accurate theoretical framework for describing ensembles for proteins under strongly denaturing conditions. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[60]  L. J. Terry,et al.  Nuclear mRNA export requires specific FG nucleoporins for translocation through the nuclear pore complex , 2007, The Journal of cell biology.

[61]  B. Chait,et al.  Determining the architectures of macromolecular assemblies , 2007, Nature.

[62]  L. J. Terry,et al.  Crossing the Nuclear Envelope: Hierarchical Regulation of Nucleocytoplasmic Transport , 2007, Science.

[63]  D. Denning,et al.  Rapid Evolution Exposes the Boundaries of Domain Structure and Function in Natively Unfolded FG Nucleoporins*S , 2007, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[64]  Zoran Obradovic,et al.  DisProt: the Database of Disordered Proteins , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..

[65]  M. Rexach,et al.  Natively Unfolded Nucleoporins Gate Protein Diffusion across the Nuclear Pore Complex , 2007, Cell.

[66]  B. Chait,et al.  The molecular architecture of the nuclear pore complex , 2007, Nature.

[67]  Michael J. Crawley,et al.  The R book , 2022 .

[68]  G. Blobel,et al.  Architecture of a Coat for the Nuclear Pore Membrane , 2007, Cell.

[69]  U. Aebi,et al.  Towards reconciling structure and function in the nuclear pore complex , 2008, Histochemistry and Cell Biology.

[70]  Vladimir Vacic,et al.  Composition Profiler: a tool for discovery and visualization of amino acid composition differences , 2007, BMC Bioinformatics.

[71]  U. Aebi,et al.  Nanomechanical Basis of Selective Gating by the Nuclear Pore Complex , 2007, Science.

[72]  Friedrich Förster,et al.  Snapshots of nuclear pore complexes in action captured by cryo-electron tomography , 2007, Nature.

[73]  Eric D. Spear,et al.  Structural Evidence for Common Ancestry of the Nuclear Pore Complex and Vesicle Coats , 2008, Science.

[74]  Barry Robson,et al.  Protein folding revisited. , 2008, Progress in molecular biology and translational science.

[75]  M. Rexach,et al.  Discovering Novel Interactions at the Nuclear Pore Complex Using Bead Halo , 2008, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[76]  V. V. Krishnan,et al.  Intramolecular Cohesion of Coils Mediated by Phenylalanine–Glycine Motifs in the Natively Unfolded Domain of a Nucleoporin , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[77]  Artificial Nanopores that Mimic the Transport Selectivity of the Nuclear Pore Complex , 2009 .

[78]  M. Hetzer,et al.  Border control at the nucleus: biogenesis and organization of the nuclear membrane and pore complexes. , 2009, Developmental cell.

[79]  Steffen Frey,et al.  Characterisation of the passive permeability barrier of nuclear pore complexes , 2009, The EMBO journal.

[80]  Mark C. Field,et al.  Evidence for a Shared Nuclear Pore Complex Architecture That Is Conserved from the Last Common Eukaryotic Ancestor* , 2009, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[81]  R. Peters Translocation through the nuclear pore: Kaps pave the way , 2009, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[82]  M. Rout,et al.  Nuclear pore complex biogenesis. , 2009, Current opinion in cell biology.

[83]  Z. Reich,et al.  Cargo surface hydrophobicity is sufficient to overcome the nuclear pore complex selectivity barrier , 2009, The EMBO journal.

[84]  D. Görlich,et al.  FG/FxFG as well as GLFG repeats form a selective permeability barrier with self-healing properties , 2009, The EMBO journal.

[85]  M. Rexach Piecing together nuclear pore complex assembly during interphase , 2009, The Journal of cell biology.

[86]  O. Medalia,et al.  Structural analysis of a metazoan nuclear pore complex reveals a fused concentric ring architecture. , 2010, Journal of molecular biology.