Current progress in Structure-Based Rational Drug Design marks a new mindset in drug discovery

The past decade has witnessed a paradigm shift in preclinical drug discovery with structure-based drug design (SBDD) making a comeback while high-throughput screening (HTS) methods have continued to generate disappointing results. There is a deficit of information between identified hits and the many criteria that must be fulfilled in parallel to convert them into preclinical candidates that have a real chance to become a drug. This gap can be bridged by investigating the interactions between the ligands and their receptors. Accurate calculations of the free energy of binding are still elusive; however progresses were made with respect to how one may deal with the versatile role of water. A corpus of knowledge combining X-ray structures, bioinformatics and molecular modeling techniques now allows drug designers to routinely produce receptor homology models of increasing quality. These models serve as a basis to establish and validate efficient rationales used to tailor and/or screen virtual libraries with enhanced chances of obtaining hits. Many case reports of successful SBDD show how synergy can be gained from the combined use of several techniques. The role of SBDD with respect to two different classes of widely investigated pharmaceutical targets: (a) protein kinases (PK) and (b) G-protein coupled receptors (GPCR) is discussed. Throughout these examples prototypical situations covering the current possibilities and limitations of SBDD are presented.

[1]  D. Mobley,et al.  Entropy-enthalpy compensation: role and ramifications in biomolecular ligand recognition and design. , 2013, Annual review of biophysics.

[2]  R. Bywater Protein folding: a problem with multiple solutions , 2013, Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics.

[3]  B. Davis,et al.  Targeting conserved water molecules: design of 4-aryl-5-cyanopyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidine Hsp90 inhibitors using fragment-based screening and structure-based optimization. , 2012, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry.

[4]  Britt-Marie Swahn,et al.  Discovery of AZD3839, a Potent and Selective BACE1 Inhibitor Clinical Candidate for the Treatment of Alzheimer Disease* , 2012, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[5]  J. Gibrat,et al.  Automatic modeling of mammalian olfactory receptors and docking of odorants. , 2012, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.

[6]  Michael K Gilson,et al.  Grid inhomogeneous solvation theory: hydration structure and thermodynamics of the miniature receptor cucurbit[7]uril. , 2012, The Journal of chemical physics.

[7]  J. M. Perez-Aguilar,et al.  Human μ Opioid Receptor Models with Evaluation of the Accuracy Using the Crystal Structure of the Murine μ Opioid Receptor , 2012, Journal of anesthesia & clinical research.

[8]  Andreas Bender,et al.  A prospective cross-screening study on G-protein-coupled receptors: lessons learned in virtual compound library design. , 2012, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[9]  Richard A. Friesner,et al.  Docking performance of the glide program as evaluated on the Astex and DUD datasets: a complete set of glide SP results and selected results for a new scoring function integrating WaterMap and glide , 2012, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.

[10]  Ajay N. Jain,et al.  Surflex-Dock: Docking benchmarks and real-world application , 2012, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.

[11]  Hiromi Imamura,et al.  Visualization and Measurement of ATP Levels in Living Cells Replicating Hepatitis C Virus Genome RNA , 2012, PLoS pathogens.

[12]  Gregory A Ross,et al.  Rapid and Accurate Prediction and Scoring of Water Molecules in Protein Binding Sites , 2012, PloS one.

[13]  Junmei Wang,et al.  Challenges in Binding Free Energy Calculation using MM-PB/GBSA , 2012 .

[14]  Susmita Roy,et al.  Free energy barriers for escape of water molecules from protein hydration layer. , 2012, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[15]  S. Bryant,et al.  Structure-Based Virtual Screening for Drug Discovery: a Problem-Centric Review , 2012, The AAPS Journal.

[16]  Ross McGuire,et al.  Drug design for ever, from hype to hope , 2012, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.

[17]  Terry R. Stouch,et al.  The errors of our ways: taking account of error in computer-aided drug design to build confidence intervals for our next 25 years , 2012, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.

[18]  Garland R. Marshall,et al.  Limiting assumptions in structure-based design: binding entropy , 2012, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.

[19]  Nishant Toomula,et al.  Computational Methods for Protein Structure Prediction and Its Application in Drug Design , 2011 .

[20]  Ruben Abagyan,et al.  GPCR agonist binding revealed by modeling and crystallography. , 2011, Trends in pharmacological sciences.

[21]  Davide Provasi,et al.  Ligand-Induced Modulation of the Free-Energy Landscape of G Protein-Coupled Receptors Explored by Adaptive Biasing Techniques , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[22]  E. Howell,et al.  Isothermal Titration Calorimetry for Measuring Macromolecule-Ligand Affinity , 2011, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[23]  Chris de Graaf,et al.  Snooker: A Structure-Based Pharmacophore Generation Tool Applied to Class A GPCRs , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[24]  Bas Vroling,et al.  In Silico Veritas: The Pitfalls and Challenges of Predicting GPCR-Ligand Interactions , 2011, Pharmaceuticals.

[25]  Jacob de Vlieg,et al.  ss-TEA: Entropy based identification of receptor specific ligand binding residues from a multiple sequence alignment of class A GPCRs , 2011, BMC Bioinformatics.

[26]  N. Foloppe The benefits of constructing leads from fragment hits. , 2011, Future medicinal chemistry.

[27]  Lihong Hu,et al.  Accurate predictions of nonpolar solvation free energies require explicit consideration of binding-site hydration. , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[28]  Stanley J. Watowich,et al.  Using Free Energy of Binding Calculations To Improve the Accuracy of Virtual Screening Predictions , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[29]  S. Rasmussen,et al.  Crystal Structure of the β2Adrenergic Receptor-Gs protein complex , 2011, Nature.

[30]  Doris Hafenbradl,et al.  A comparative study of fragment screening methods on the p38α kinase: new methods, new insights , 2011, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[31]  Lei Liu,et al.  Free energy calculations on the two drug binding sites in the M2 proton channel. , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[32]  Catherine L. Worth,et al.  GPCR-SSFE: A comprehensive database of G-protein-coupled receptor template predictions and homology models , 2011, BMC Bioinformatics.

[33]  C. G. Mohan,et al.  First Pharmacophore Model of CCR3 Receptor Antagonists and its Homology Model‐Assisted, Stepwise Virtual Screening , 2011, Chemical biology & drug design.

[34]  Mirko Zimic,et al.  Docking and quantitative structure–activity relationship studies for 3-fluoro-4-(pyrrolo[2,1-f][1,2,4]triazin-4-yloxy)aniline, 3-fluoro-4-(1H-pyrrolo[2,3-b]pyridin-4-yloxy)aniline, and 4-(4-amino-2-fluorophenoxy)-2-pyridinylamine derivatives as c-Met kinase inhibitors , 2011, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[35]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  Recent advances in ligand-based drug design: relevance and utility of the conformationally sampled pharmacophore approach. , 2011, Current computer-aided drug design.

[36]  Peter Güntert,et al.  Structure-guided fragment-based in silico drug design of dengue protease inhibitors , 2011, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[37]  R. Sanchez,et al.  Systematic assessment of accuracy of comparative model of proteins belonging to different structural fold classes , 2011, Journal of Molecular Modeling.

[38]  Jörg D. Wichard,et al.  Chemogenomic Analysis of G-Protein Coupled Receptors and Their Ligands Deciphers Locks and Keys Governing Diverse Aspects of Signalling , 2011, PloS one.

[39]  Claudio N. Cavasotto,et al.  Docking-based virtual screening for ligands of G protein-coupled receptors: not only crystal structures but also in silico models. , 2011, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[40]  Hagai Meirovitch,et al.  New method for calculating the absolute free energy of binding: the effect of a mobile loop on the avidin/biotin complex. , 2011, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[41]  J. Bajorath,et al.  Quo vadis, virtual screening? A comprehensive survey of prospective applications. , 2010, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[42]  R. Abagyan,et al.  Conserved binding mode of human beta2 adrenergic receptor inverse agonists and antagonist revealed by X-ray crystallography. , 2010, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[43]  J. Bajorath,et al.  Scaffold hopping using two-dimensional fingerprints: true potential, black magic, or a hopeless endeavor? Guidelines for virtual screening. , 2010, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[44]  Andriy Kovalenko,et al.  An MM/3D-RISM approach for ligand binding affinities. , 2010, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[45]  Arieh Warshel,et al.  Absolute binding free energy calculations: On the accuracy of computational scoring of protein–ligand interactions , 2010, Proteins.

[46]  Steven O. Smith Structure and activation of the visual pigment rhodopsin. , 2010, Annual review of biophysics.

[47]  Yu-Wei Chang,et al.  An enriched structural kinase database to enable kinome‐wide structure‐based analyses and drug discovery , 2010, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[48]  T. Sakmar,et al.  Tracking G-protein-coupled receptor activation using genetically encoded infrared probes , 2010, Nature.

[49]  Martin Hofmann-Apitius,et al.  In silico drug discovery approaches on grid computing infrastructures. , 2010, Current clinical pharmacology.

[50]  Gerhard Klebe,et al.  How to Replace the Residual Solvation Shell of Polar Active Site Residues to Achieve Nanomolar Inhibition of tRNA‐Guanine Transglycosylase , 2009, ChemMedChem.

[51]  D. Flower,et al.  Toward the Discovery of Vaccine Adjuvants: Coupling In Silico Screening and In Vitro Analysis of Antagonist Binding to Human and Mouse CCR4 Receptors , 2009, PloS one.

[52]  Maria A Miteva,et al.  Structure-based virtual ligand screening: recent success stories. , 2009, Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening.

[53]  P. Scheerer,et al.  A G protein-coupled receptor at work: the rhodopsin model. , 2009, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[54]  Stefano Costanzi,et al.  Ligand and structure-based methodologies for the prediction of the activity of G protein-coupled receptor ligands , 2009, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[55]  L. J. Eldik,et al.  Targeting protein kinases in central nervous system disorders , 2009, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[56]  G. Klebe,et al.  High-affinity inhibitors of tRNA-guanine transglycosylase replacing the function of a structural water cluster. , 2009, Chemistry.

[57]  Steven O. Smith,et al.  Multiple switches in G protein-coupled receptor activation. , 2009, Trends in pharmacological sciences.

[58]  Bas Vroling,et al.  Homology modelling and spectroscopy, a never-ending love story , 2009, European Biophysics Journal.

[59]  Nicolas Foloppe,et al.  Discovery and functional evaluation of diverse novel human CB(1) receptor ligands. , 2009, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters.

[60]  Haruki Nakamura,et al.  Protein-Ligand Binding Free Energy Calculation by the Smooth Reaction Path Generation (SRPG) Method , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[61]  Sid Topiol,et al.  X-ray structure breakthroughs in the GPCR transmembrane region. , 2009, Biochemical pharmacology.

[62]  Andrew J. Woodhead,et al.  From fragment to clinical candidate--a historical perspective. , 2009, Drug discovery today.

[63]  Charles L. Brooks,et al.  Community-wide assessment of GPCR structure modelling and ligand docking: GPCR Dock 2008 , 2009, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[64]  Yoshifumi Fukunishi,et al.  Structure-based drug screening and ligand-based drug screening with machine learning. , 2009, Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening.

[65]  Kenneth Lundstrom,et al.  An Overview on GPCRs and Drug Discovery: Structure-Based Drug Design and Structural Biology on GPCRs , 2009, Methods in molecular biology.

[66]  R. Woods,et al.  Involvement of water in carbohydrate-protein binding: concanavalin A revisited. , 2008, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[67]  Oliver P. Ernst,et al.  Crystal structure of opsin in its G-protein-interacting conformation , 2008, Nature.

[68]  V. Vyas,et al.  Virtual Screening: A Fast Tool for Drug Design , 2008 .

[69]  Yang Zhang Progress and challenges in protein structure prediction. , 2008, Current opinion in structural biology.

[70]  J. Chaires,et al.  Calorimetry and thermodynamics in drug design. , 2008, Annual review of biophysics.

[71]  Stefano Costanzi,et al.  On the applicability of GPCR homology models to computer-aided drug discovery: a comparison between in silico and crystal structures of the beta2-adrenergic receptor. , 2008, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[72]  Pengyu Y. Ren,et al.  Calculation of protein–ligand binding free energy by using a polarizable potential , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[73]  Sebastian Radestock,et al.  Homology Model-Based Virtual Screening for GPCR Ligands Using Docking and Target-Biased Scoring , 2008, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[74]  H. Manji,et al.  Kinases as drug targets in the treatment of bipolar disorder. , 2008, Drug discovery today.

[75]  A. Bornot,et al.  Protein contacts, inter-residue interactions and side-chain modelling. , 2008, Biochimie.

[76]  Stefano Costanzi,et al.  A virtual screen for diverse ligands: discovery of selective G protein-coupled receptor antagonists. , 2008, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[77]  B. Kobilka,et al.  New G-protein-coupled receptor crystal structures: insights and limitations. , 2008, Trends in pharmacological sciences.

[78]  Maria A. Miteva,et al.  Hierarchical Structure-Based Virtual Screening for Drug Design , 2008 .

[79]  M. Burghammer,et al.  Crystal structure of the human β2 adrenergic G-protein-coupled receptor , 2007, Nature.

[80]  René Meier,et al.  Generation of a homology model of the human histamine H3 receptor for ligand docking and pharmacophore-based screening , 2007, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[81]  Xavier Deupi,et al.  Conformational complexity of G-protein-coupled receptors. , 2007, Trends in pharmacological sciences.

[82]  G. Klebe,et al.  Crystal structures of tRNA-guanine transglycosylase (TGT) in complex with novel and potent inhibitors unravel pronounced induced-fit adaptations and suggest dimer formation upon substrate binding. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[83]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  IRECS: A new algorithm for the selection of most probable ensembles of side‐chain conformations in protein models , 2007, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[84]  Junmei Wang,et al.  GPCR Structure-Based Virtual Screening Approach for CB2 Antagonist Search , 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[85]  H. Kubinyi Hydrogen Bonding: The Last Mystery in Drug Design? , 2007 .

[86]  Anatoly M. Ruvinsky,et al.  Calculations of protein-ligand binding entropy of relative and overall molecular motions , 2007, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[87]  Manfred J. Sippl,et al.  QSCOP - SCOP quantified by structural relationships , 2007, Bioinform..

[88]  T. Lazaridis,et al.  Water at biomolecular binding interfaces. , 2007, Physical Chemistry, Chemical Physics - PCCP.

[89]  G. Narahari Sastry,et al.  Strategies to design pyrazolyl urea derivatives for p38 kinase inhibition: a molecular modeling study , 2007, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[90]  John P. Overington,et al.  How many drug targets are there? , 2006, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[91]  B. Roux,et al.  Absolute binding free energy calculations using molecular dynamics simulations with restraining potentials. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[92]  David M. Ferguson,et al.  A combined ligand-based and target-based drug design approach for G-protein coupled receptors: application to salvinorin A, a selective kappa opioid receptor agonist , 2006, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[93]  Andrew Potter,et al.  Identification of chemically diverse Chk1 inhibitors by receptor-based virtual screening. , 2006, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry.

[94]  G. Klebe Virtual ligand screening: strategies, perspectives and limitations , 2006, Drug Discovery Today.

[95]  Erin M Duffy,et al.  Structure-based drug design meets the ribosome. , 2006, Biochemical pharmacology.

[96]  K. Balakin,et al.  Rational design approaches to chemical libraries for hit identification. , 2006, Current drug discovery technologies.

[97]  Themis Lazaridis,et al.  Thermodynamics of buried water clusters at a protein-ligand binding interface. , 2006, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[98]  F. Sheinerman,et al.  High affinity targets of protein kinase inhibitors have similar residues at the positions energetically important for binding. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[99]  Philip E. Bourne,et al.  Structural Evolution of the Protein Kinase–Like Superfamily , 2005, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[100]  Russell L. Marsden,et al.  Progress of structural genomics initiatives: an analysis of solved target structures. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[101]  Andrew Potter,et al.  Structure-based design of novel Chk1 inhibitors: insights into hydrogen bonding and protein-ligand affinity. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[102]  Christopher W Murray,et al.  Fragment-based lead discovery using X-ray crystallography. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[103]  Themis Lazaridis,et al.  The effect of water displacement on binding thermodynamics: concanavalin A. , 2005, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[104]  J. Bajorath,et al.  Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: methods and applications , 2004, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[105]  K. Pavelić,et al.  Accelerating drug discovery , 2004, EMBO reports.

[106]  Andrew F Neuwald,et al.  Evolutionary constraints associated with functional specificity of the CMGC protein kinases MAPK, CDK, GSK, SRPK, DYRK, and CK2α , 2004, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[107]  Rick Mullin,et al.  DRUG DISCOVERY: As high-throughput screening draws fire, researchers leverage science to put automation into perspective , 2004 .

[108]  G. Wolf The discovery of vitamin D: the contribution of Adolf Windaus. , 2004, The Journal of nutrition.

[109]  A. Hopkins,et al.  Ligand efficiency: a useful metric for lead selection. , 2004, Drug discovery today.

[110]  G Vriend,et al.  Heavier‐than‐air flying machines are impossible , 2004, FEBS letters.

[111]  R. Mullin PRIMING THE PIPELINE , 2004 .

[112]  Klaus Gundertofte,et al.  Pharmacophore and receptor models for neurokinin receptors , 2003, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[113]  Marion Gurrath,et al.  Molecular modelling studies on the ORL1-receptor and ORL1-agonists , 2003, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[114]  Laerte Oliveira,et al.  Identification of functionally conserved residues with the use of entropy–variability plots , 2003, Proteins.

[115]  Haregewein Assefa,et al.  3D-QSAR and docking studies on 4-anilinoquinazoline and 4-anilinoquinoline epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors , 2003, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[116]  Jing Lin,et al.  The role of absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion and toxicity in drug discovery. , 2003, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.

[117]  Hans-Joachim Böhm,et al.  A guide to drug discovery: Hit and lead generation: beyond high-throughput screening , 2003, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[118]  Didier Rognan,et al.  Protein‐based virtual screening of chemical databases. II. Are homology models of g‐protein coupled receptors suitable targets? , 2002, Proteins.

[119]  A. Panchenko,et al.  Comparison of sequence and structure alignments for protein domains , 2002, Proteins.

[120]  Jonathan W. Essex,et al.  A review of protein-small molecule docking methods , 2002, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[121]  A. Panchenko,et al.  A comparison of position‐specific score matrices based on sequence and structure alignments , 2002, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[122]  Peter D. J. Grootenhuis,et al.  Comparative molecular field analysis and energy interaction studies of thrombin-inhibitor complexes , 1999, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[123]  R. Lanzara,et al.  Activation of G protein-coupled receptors entails cysteine modulation of agonist binding , 1998 .

[124]  T Head-Gordon,et al.  Is water structure around hydrophobic groups clathrate-like? , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[125]  D. Baker,et al.  Conservation, Variability and the Modeling of Active Protein Kinases , 1995, Environmental health perspectives.

[126]  T. Hunter,et al.  The eukaryotic protein kinase superfamily: kinase (catalytic) domain structure and classification 1 , 1995, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[127]  George W. A. Milne,et al.  QSAR of conformationally flexible molecules: Comparative Molecular Field Analysis of protein-tyrosine kinase inhibitors , 1992, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[128]  A. Ben-Naim Solvent effects on protein association and protein folding , 1990, Biopolymers.

[129]  P J Goodford,et al.  COMPOUNDS DESIGNED TO FIT A SITE OF KNOWN STRUCTURE IN HUMAN HAEMOGLOBIN , 1976, British journal of pharmacology.

[130]  D. Ingle,et al.  The biologic properties of cortisone: a review. , 1950, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[131]  O. Rosenheim,et al.  The Ring-system of sterols and bile acids. Part II , 1932 .

[132]  H. King,et al.  The ring‐system of sterols and bile acids , 1932 .

[133]  G. Murray THE LIFE-HISTORY OF THE FIRST CASE OF MYXOEDEMA TREATED BY THYROID EXTRACT , 1920, British medical journal.

[134]  Anat Levit,et al.  Homology model-assisted elucidation of binding sites in GPCRs. , 2012, Methods in molecular biology.

[135]  Daniel A Erlanson,et al.  Introduction to fragment-based drug discovery. , 2012, Topics in current chemistry.

[136]  Dora M Schnur,et al.  Beyond rhodopsin: G protein-coupled receptor structure and modeling incorporating the beta2-adrenergic and adenosine A(2A) crystal structures. , 2011, Methods in molecular biology.

[137]  Jean-Louis Reymond,et al.  Exploring the chemical space of known and unknown organic small molecules at www.gdb.unibe.ch. , 2011, Chimia.

[138]  N. Gray,et al.  Targeting cancer with small molecule kinase inhibitors , 2009, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[139]  K. Karplus,et al.  Improving physical realism, stereochemistry, and side‐chain accuracy in homology modeling: Four approaches that performed well in CASP8 , 2009, Proteins.

[140]  S. Hansen [The development of adrenal cortical hormones into drugs]. , 2008, Dansk medicinhistorisk arbog.

[141]  Markus H. J. Seifert,et al.  Essential factors for successful virtual screening. , 2008, Mini reviews in medicinal chemistry.

[142]  B. Villoutreix,et al.  Virtual Ligand Screening for Structure-based Drug Design: Approaches and Progress , 2007 .

[143]  Xavier Deupi,et al.  Activation of G protein-coupled receptors. , 2007, Advances in protein chemistry.

[144]  A. Gorse Diversity in medicinal chemistry space. , 2006, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.

[145]  Robert P Bywater,et al.  Location and nature of the residues important for ligand recognition in G‐protein coupled receptors , 2005, Journal of molecular recognition : JMR.

[146]  Michael A. Santaro Ethics and the Pharmaceutical Industry: Introduction: Charting a Sustainable Path for the Twenty-First Century Pharmaceutical Industry , 2005 .

[147]  Amiram Goldblum,et al.  Identifying the binding mode of a molecular scaffold , 2004, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[148]  P. Englebienne,et al.  Surface plasmon resonance: principles, methods and applications in biomedical sciences , 2003 .

[149]  J. Butler The energy and entropy of hydration of organic compounds , 1937 .