Advanced sciences convergence based methods for surveillance of emerging trends in science, technology, and intelligence

Purpose – Strategic decision-making is a complex process and encompasses an exhaustive knowledge base, collective guidance, contemporary foresight, analytical capabilities, paradigmatic congruence, and risk assessment and optimization within mission space. Employing advanced sciences convergence and analytical methodologies, the aim of this report is to provide a set of plausible solution trajectories to complex scenarios. Design/methodology/approach – Three methodologies are reported here which provide policymakers with plausible solution pathways and alternatives. The methodologies, namely: TechFARM, ADAMS, and NESTTS, involve convergence of scientific disciplines, cutting edge technologies, social dynamics, astute extraction, and principles of foresight to support the process of informed decision-making, as comprehensive tools to develop a plausible solution space and future trends. Findings – The methodologies provided in this report provide scientific basis to trends analysis and foresight. Few selec...

[1]  S. G. Deshmukh,et al.  Matching of technological forecasting technique to a technology , 2002 .

[2]  A. Harvey,et al.  TREND ESTIMATION AND THE HODRICK-PRESCOTT FILTER , 2008 .

[3]  A. Vaseashta,et al.  Nanomaterials Nexus in Environmental, Human Health, and Sustainability , 2009 .

[4]  D. Dimova‐Malinovska,et al.  Nanostructured and advanced materials for applications in sensor, optoelectronic and photovoltaic technology , 2005 .

[5]  C. Moore.  Group Techniques for Idea Building , 1987 .

[6]  S. Cunningham,et al.  Technology futures analysis: Toward integration of the field and new methods , 2004 .

[7]  John Naylor.  Operations Management , 1995 .

[8]  Ingoo Han,et al.  The IS risk analysis based on a business model , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[9]  R. Ackoff.  Towards a System of Systems Concepts , 1971 .

[10]  Ashok Vaseashta,et al.  Functionalized Nanoscale Materials, Devices and Systems , 2008 .

[11]  Joseph Paul Martino,et al.  Technological Forecasting for Decisionmaking , 1975 .

[12]  Arie Rip,et al.  Tracking the evolution of new and emerging S&T via statement-linkages: Vision assessment in molecular machines , 2007, Scientometrics.

[13]  David H. Guston,et al.  Real-time technology assessment , 2020, Emerging Technologies: Ethics, Law and Governance.

[14]  Ismael Rafols,et al.  A global map of science based on the ISI subject categories , 2009 .

[15]  Ian Witten,et al.  Data Mining , 2000 .

[16]  Jyrki Wallenius,et al.  Multiple Criteria Decision Making: From Early History to the 21st Century , 2011 .

[17]  Jacques-Louis Lions,et al.  Mathematical Analysis and Numerical Methods for Science and Technology : Volume 4 Integral Equations and Numerical Methods , 2000 .

[18]  M. Patton,et al.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods , 1992 .

[19]  Kenneth W. Abbott,et al.  Risk Management Principles for Nanotechnology , 2007 .

[20]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: Environmental Applications and Case Studies , 2011 .

[21]  Mihail C Roco,et al.  Environmentally responsible development of nanotechnology. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[22]  Mitchell J Small,et al.  Methods for Assessing Uncertainty in Fundamental Assumptions and Associated Models for Cancer Risk Assessment , 2008, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[23]  J. Kadane,et al.  Experiences in elicitation , 1998 .

[24]  C. C. Chang,et al.  National technology foresight research: a literature review from 1984 to 2005 , 2010 .

[25]  Murray Turoff,et al.  The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications , 1976 .

[26]  Ozcan Saritas,et al.  Science and technology foresight baker's dozen: a pocket primer of comparative and combined foresight methods , 2011 .

[27]  S. Priest.  The North American opinion climate for nanotechnology and its products: Opportunities and challenges , 2006 .

[28]  F. Mosteller,et al.  Understanding robust and exploratory data analysis , 1985 .

[29]  Olivier Da Costa,et al.  The impact of foresight on policy-making: insights from the FORLEARN mutual learning process , 2008, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[30]  Paul Nightingale,et al.  Biosecurity, bioterrorism and the governance of science: The increasing convergence of science and security policy , 2007 .

[31]  Philip E. Auerswald,et al.  Between Invention and Innovation An Analysis of Funding for Early-Stage Technology Development , 2002 .

[32]  Rodney L. Custer,et al.  The Modified Delphi Technique - A Rotational Modification , 1999 .

[33]  Ashok Vaseashta,et al.  Technological Innovations in Sensing and Detection of Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear Threats and Ecological Terrorism , 2012, NATO Science for Peace and Security Series A: Chemistry and Biology.

[34]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  Tech Mining: Exploiting New Technologies for Competitive Advantage , 2004 .

[35]  Luke Georghiou,et al.  The targeted and unforeseen impacts of foresight on innovation policy: the eFORESEE Malta case study , 2005 .

[36]  Mihail C. Roco,et al.  Societal implications of nanoscience and nanotechnology: Maximizing human benefit , 2005 .