Using multivariate analysis to deliver conservation planning products that align with practitioner needs

This software note describes an extension to the conservation planning package Marxan in which multiple solutions can be evaluated instead of only relying on the measures of best solution and irreplaceability. For this extension we coupled Marxan with the statistical software R. The pool of possible conservation plans is transferred from Marxan into R - which returns an ordination plot, as well as a cluster dendrogram that can be used to evaluate similarity of solutions. Also, the most efficient solutions per group are flagged. We believe that identification of alternative planning options facilitates review and implementation of Marxan solutions as negotiating parties have multiple alternative starting points.

[1]  Matthew E. Watts,et al.  Incorporating ecological and evolutionary processes into continental-scale conservation planning. , 2009, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[2]  Richard M Cowling,et al.  Designing Systematic Conservation Assessments that Promote Effective Implementation: Best Practice from South Africa , 2006, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[3]  J. Kruskal.  Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis , 1964 .

[4]  Richard M Cowling,et al.  Knowing But Not Doing: Selecting Priority Conservation Areas and the Research–Implementation Gap , 2008, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[5]  R. Cowling,et al.  From theory to practice: Designing and situating spatial prioritization approaches to better implement conservation action , 2009 .

[6]  Matthew E. Watts,et al.  Marxan and relatives: Software for spatial conservation prioritization , 2009 .

[7]  G. De’ath,et al.  Establishing Representative No‐Take Areas in the Great Barrier Reef: Large‐Scale Implementation of Theory on Marine Protected Areas , 2005 .

[8]  D. Faith,et al.  Compositional dissimilarity as a robust measure of ecological distance , 1987, Vegetatio.

[9]  B. Kendall,et al.  Striking a Balance between Biodiversity Conservation and Socioeconomic Viability in the Design of Marine Protected Areas , 2008, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[10]  Jamie B. Kirkpatrick,et al.  An iterative method for establishing priorities for the selection of nature reserves: An example from Tasmania , 1983 .

[11]  Heather M. Leslie,et al.  Applying ecological criteria to marine reserve design: A case study from the california channel islands , 2003 .

[12]  S. Andelman,et al.  Mathematical Methods for Identifying Representative Reserve Networks , 2000 .