Introducing IT-enabled Business Flexibility and IT Integration in the Acquirer's M&A Performance Equation

Though mergers and acquisitions (M&A) are a common strategy to reduce costs and pursue growth, the variance in returns from M&A is very high. This research explores how information technology (IT) affects firms’ ability to sense and seize M&A opportunities and assimilate acquisitions. Using a combination of secondary as well as matched-pair survey data from 100 mid-size Spanish firms, the empirical analysis suggests that through the development of business flexibility and IT integration capability, a flexible IT infrastructure enables firms to pursue M&A opportunities and facilitates the integration of IT and business resources of the merged firm, to help realize the economic benefits of M&A activities.

[1]  L. Capron The long‐term performance of horizontal acquisitions , 1999 .

[2]  Hüseyin Tanriverdi,et al.  Cross-Business Information Technology Integration and Acquirer Value Creation in Corporate Mergers and Acquisitions , 2011, Inf. Syst. Res..

[3]  R. Katila,et al.  Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: a longitudinal study , 2001 .

[4]  Mason A. Carpenter,et al.  Taking Stock of What We Know About Mergers and Acquisitions: A Review and Research Agenda , 2008 .

[5]  M. C. Jensen Takeovers: Their Causes and Consequences , 1988 .

[6]  Wynne W. Chin How to Write Up and Report PLS Analyses , 2010 .

[7]  D. Teece Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance , 2007 .

[8]  W. Mitchell,et al.  Path-dependent and path-breaking change: reconfiguring business resources following acquisitions in the U.S. medical sector, 1978–1995 , 2000 .

[9]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  Coordinating for Flexibility in e-Business Supply Chains , 2004, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[10]  J. Barney,et al.  CAPABILITIES, BUSINESS PROCESSES, AND COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: CHOOSING THE DEPENDENT VARIABLE IN EMPIRICAL TESTS OF THE RESOURCE-BASED VIEW , 2004 .

[11]  Antonis C. Stylianou,et al.  Post-merger systems integration: the impact on IS capabilities , 1999, Inf. Manag..

[12]  Nava Pliskin,et al.  The effects of information systems integration and organizational culture on a firm's effectiveness , 1996, Inf. Manag..

[13]  S. Cartwright,et al.  Thirty Years of Mergers and Acquisitions Research: Recent Advances and Future Opportunities , 2006 .

[14]  Hüseyin Tanriverdi,et al.  Information Technology Relatedness, Knowledge Management Capability, and Performance of Multibusiness Firms , 2005, MIS Q..

[15]  R. Sohi,et al.  IT competency and firm performance: is organizational learning a missing link? , 2003 .

[16]  Cheryl Burke Jarvis,et al.  A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research , 2003 .

[17]  G. Huber,et al.  Retrospective reports of strategic‐level managers: Guidelines for increasing their accuracy , 1985 .

[18]  Terry Anthony Byrd,et al.  An Exploratory Analysis of the Value of the Skills of IT Personnel: Their Relationship to IS Infrastructure and Competitive Advantage , 2001, Decis. Sci..

[19]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[20]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: The case of the privately-held firm and conglomerate business unit , 1984 .

[21]  George P. Huber,et al.  The Decision-Making Paradigm of Organizational Design , 1986 .

[22]  A. J. Verdú-Jover,et al.  Environment–Flexibility Coalignment and Performance: An Analysis in Large versus Small Firms , 2006 .

[23]  Varun Grover,et al.  Shaping Agility through Digital Options: Reconceptualizing the Role of Information Technology in Contemporary Firms , 2003, MIS Q..

[24]  John Hulland,et al.  Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies , 1999 .

[25]  J. W. Hunt Changing pattern of acquisition behaviour in takeovers and the consequences for acquisition processes , 1990 .

[26]  W. Mitchell,et al.  Asset Divestiture Following Horizontal Acquisitions: A Dynamic View , 2001 .

[27]  Nancy Bogucki Duncan,et al.  Capturing Flexibility of Information Technology Infrastructure: A Study of Resource Characteristics and their Measure , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[28]  V. Narayanan,et al.  Strategic schemas, strategic flexibility, and firm performance: the moderating role of industry clockspeed , 2007 .

[29]  Jerry C. Wei,et al.  Impact of eBusiness technologies on operational performance: The role of production information integration in the supply chain , 2007 .

[30]  Malte Brettel,et al.  Configurations of resources and capabilities and their performance implications: an exploratory study on technology ventures , 2010 .

[31]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Untangling dynamic and operational capabilities: strategy for the (n)ever-changing world , 2011 .

[32]  S. Finkelstein,et al.  Integrating Strategic, Organizational, and Human Resource Perspectives on Mergers and Acquisitions: a Case Study of Synergy Realization , 1999 .

[33]  Kaushal Chari,et al.  Demystifying integration , 2004, CACM.

[34]  Gaylen N. Chandler,et al.  Unraveling the Determinants and Consequences of an Innovation-Supportive Organizational Culture , 2000 .

[35]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[36]  G. Susman,et al.  Advanced Manufacturing Technology and Organization Structure: Empowerment or Subordination? , 1992 .

[37]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[38]  David R. King,et al.  Performance Implications of Firm Resource Interactions in the Acquisition of R&D-Intensive Firms , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[39]  P. Weill,et al.  Building IT Infrastructure for Strategic Agility , 2002 .

[40]  Deepak K. Datta Organizational fit and acquisition performance: Effects of post-acquisition integration , 1991 .

[41]  Barbara Pernici,et al.  Information systems integration in mergers and acquisitions: A normative model , 1997, Inf. Manag..

[42]  H. Winklhofer,et al.  Index Construction with Formative Indicators: An Alternative to Scale Development , 2001 .

[43]  Gilbert A. Churchill A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs , 1979 .

[44]  Terry Anthony Byrd,et al.  Measuring the Flexibility of Information Technology Infrastructure: Exploratory Analysis of a Construct , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[45]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Corporate effects and dynamic managerial capabilities , 2003 .

[46]  Richard Schoenberg Measuring the Performance of Corporate Acquisitions: An Empirical Comparison of Alternative Metrics , 2006 .

[47]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Specifying Formative Constructs in Information Systems Research , 2007, MIS Q..

[48]  Alain Pinsonneault,et al.  A Model of Organizational Integration, Implementation Effort, and Performance , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[49]  E. Burton Swanson,et al.  Innovating Mindfully with Information Technology , 2004, MIS Q..

[50]  Harbir Singh,et al.  Deliberate learning in corporate acquisitions: post‐acquisition strategies and integration capability in U.S. bank mergers , 2004 .

[51]  N. Rajagopalan,et al.  The Influence of Acquisition Experience and Performance on Acquisition Behavior: Evidence From the U.S. Commercial Banking Industry , 2006 .

[52]  Ram L. Kumar,et al.  A Framework for Assessing the Business Value of Information Technology Infrastructures , 2004, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[53]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[54]  James Callaghan,et al.  The Role of IT , 2002 .

[55]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Technology adaption: the case of a computer-supported inter-organizational virtual team 1 , 2000 .

[56]  Antonis C. Stylianou,et al.  Corporate mergers and the problems of IS integration , 1996, Inf. Manag..

[57]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Towards The Flexible Form: How To Remain Vital in Hypercompetitive Environments , 1996 .

[58]  David R. King,et al.  Meta-analyses of Post-acquisition Performance: Indications of Unidentified Moderators , 2004 .

[59]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Dynamic capabilities : understanding strategic change in organizations , 2007 .

[60]  Terry Anthony Byrd,et al.  An exploratory examination of the relationship between flexible IT infrastructure and competitive advantage , 2001, Inf. Manag..

[61]  L. Capron,et al.  When do acquirers earn abnormal returns , 2002 .

[62]  Eric T. G. Wang,et al.  Interorganizational Governance Value Creation: Coordinating for Information Visibility and Flexibility in Supply Chains , 2007, Decis. Sci..

[63]  Nilesh Saraf,et al.  IS Application Capabilities and Relational Value in Interfirm Partnerships , 2007, Inf. Syst. Res..

[64]  Ronald T. Cenfetelli,et al.  Interpretation of Formative Measurement in Information Systems Research , 2009, MIS Q..

[65]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[66]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1999, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[67]  Jose Benitez-Amado,et al.  Information technology, the organizational capability of proactive corporate environmental strategy and firm performance: a resource-based analysis , 2012, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[68]  Mathew L. A. Hayward When do firms learn from their acquisition experience? Evidence from 1990 to 1995 , 2002 .

[69]  Wynne W. Chin Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling by , 2009 .

[70]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Technology Adaptation: The Case of a Computer-Supported Inter-Organizational Virtual Team , 2000, MIS Q..

[71]  Frank Vielba,et al.  Reducing the M & A Risks: The Role of IT in Mergers and Acquisitions , 2005 .