Big data, technology capability and construction project quality: a cross-level investigation

Purpose – Embracing big data has been at the forefront of research for project management. Although there is a consensus that the adoption of big data has significantly positive impact on project performance, far less is known about how this innovative information technology becomes an effective driver of construction project quality improvement. This study aims to better understand the mechanism and conditions under which big data can effectively improve project quality performance. Design/methodology/approach – Adopting Chinese construction enterprises as samples, the theoretical framework proposed in this paper is verified by the empirical results of the two-level hierarchical linear model. The moderated mediation analysis is also conducted to test the hypotheses. Finally, the empirical findings are validated by a comparative case study. Findings – The results show that big data facilitates the development of technology capability, which further produces remarkable quality performance. That is, a project team’s technology capability acts as a mediator in the relationship between organizational adaptability of big data and predictive analytics and project quality performance. It is also observed that two types of project team interdependence (goal and task interdependence) positively moderate the mediation effect. Research limitations/implications – The questionnaire study from China only represents the relationship within a short time interval in the current context. Future studies should apply longitudinal designs to properly test the causality and use multiple data sources to ensure the validity and robustness of the conclusions. Practical implications – The value of big data in terms of quality improvement could not be determined in a vacuum, it also depends on the internal capability development and elaborate design of project governance. Originality/value – This study provides an extension of the existing big data studies and fuels the ongoing debate on its actual outcomes in project management. It not only clarifies the direct effect of big data on project quality improvement, but also identifies the mechanism and conditions under which the adoption of big data can play an effective role.

[1]  Yujie Lu,et al.  Building Information Modeling (BIM) for green buildings: A critical review and future directions , 2017 .

[2]  Raymond E. Levitt,et al.  Towards project management 2.0 , 2011 .

[3]  Chih-Chen Chang,et al.  Automated dimensional quality assurance of full-scale precast concrete elements using laser scanning and BIM , 2016 .

[4]  Benachir Medjdoub,et al.  Big Data to support sustainable urban energy planning: The EvoEnergy project , 2020, Frontiers of Engineering Management.

[5]  Bent Flyvbjerg,et al.  Quality Control and Due Diligence in Project Management: Getting Decisions Right by Taking the Outside View , 2013, 1302.2544.

[6]  Eugene F. Stone,et al.  Clarifying some controversial issues surrounding statistical procedures for detecting moderator variables: Empirical evidence and related matters. , 1989 .

[7]  Benjamin T. Hazen,et al.  Supply chain innovation diffusion: going beyond adoption , 2012 .

[8]  Paul E. Tesluk,et al.  A Comparison of Approaches to Forming Composite Measures in Structural Equation Models , 2000 .

[9]  Z. Irani,et al.  Critical analysis of Big Data challenges and analytical methods , 2017 .

[10]  José D. Ríos,et al.  Contextual factors intervening in the manufacturing strategy and technology management-performance relationship , 2019, International Journal of Production Economics.

[11]  Jieh-Haur Chen,et al.  Assessing impacts of information technology on project success through knowledge management practice , 2012 .

[12]  K. N. Jha,et al.  Critical Factors Affecting Quality Performance in Construction Projects , 2006 .

[13]  Peter M. Bentler,et al.  Practical Issues in Structural Modeling , 1987 .

[14]  Jing Pan,et al.  GIS-based dynamic construction site material layout evaluation for building renovation projects , 2012 .

[15]  M. Dooms,et al.  Knowledge transfers and project-based learning in large scale infrastructure development projects: an exploratory and comparative ex-post analysis , 2017 .

[16]  Ruochen Zeng,et al.  Social responsibility of major infrastructure projects in China , 2015 .

[17]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues , 2001, MIS Q..

[18]  Jian Liu,et al.  Research into the moderating effects of progress and quality performance in project dispute negotiation , 2014 .

[19]  David Arditi,et al.  Total quality management in the construction process , 1997 .

[20]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[21]  Shu Lin,et al.  Team Dispersion, Information Technology, and Project Performance , 2013 .

[22]  B. Reich,et al.  How knowledge management impacts performance in projects: An empirical study , 2014 .

[23]  Han Lin,et al.  An indicator system for evaluating megaproject social responsibility , 2017 .

[24]  Gina J. Medsker,et al.  RELATIONS BETWEEN WORK GROUP CHARACTERISTICS AND EFFECTIVENESS: IMPLICATIONS FOR DESIGNING EFFECTIVE WORK GROUPS , 1993 .

[25]  John P. A. Ioannidis,et al.  Big data meets public health , 2014, Science.

[26]  Marko Mihic,et al.  Project success analysis framework: A knowledge-based approach in project management , 2015 .

[27]  D. Samson,et al.  EXPLODING THE MYTH: DO ALL QUALITY MANAGEMENT PRACTICES CONTRIBUTE TO SUPERIOR QUALITY PERFORMANCE? , 1999 .

[28]  Veda C. Storey,et al.  Business Intelligence and Analytics: From Big Data to Big Impact , 2012, MIS Q..

[29]  G. King,et al.  Ensuring the Data-Rich Future of the Social Sciences , 2011, Science.

[30]  Manman Wang,et al.  A review of systematic evaluation and improvement in the big data environment , 2020, Frontiers of Engineering Management.

[31]  Han Lin,et al.  The quality traceability system for prefabricated buildings using blockchain: An integrated framework , 2020, Frontiers of Engineering Management.

[32]  Vivian W. Y Tam,et al.  Does megaproject social responsibility improve the sustainability of the construction industry? , 2019, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management.

[33]  Ron Basu Managing quality in projects: An empirical study , 2014 .

[34]  Gary Klein,et al.  The contribution of resource interdependence to IT program performance: A social interdependence perspective , 2011 .

[35]  Quanke Su,et al.  Avoiding the innovation island in infrastructure mega-project , 2018 .

[36]  Blaize Horner Reich,et al.  Plans versus people: Comparing knowledge management approaches in IT-enabled business projects , 2015 .

[37]  George P. Baker,et al.  Incentives and cooperation: the joint effects of task and reward interdependence on group performance , 1997 .

[38]  N. Thongpapanl,et al.  Structural and Relational Influences on the Role of Reward Interdependence in Product Innovation , 2015 .

[39]  Albert H. Segars,et al.  Knowledge Management: An Organizational Capabilities Perspective , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[40]  Ping Lu,et al.  Quality management practices and inter-organizational project performance: Moderating effect of governance mechanisms , 2019, International Journal of Project Management.

[41]  S. Singh,et al.  Green innovation and organizational performance: The influence of big data and the moderating role of management commitment and HR practices , 2019, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[42]  Yi Peng,et al.  Benchmarking construction waste management performance using big data , 2015 .

[43]  Jennifer Whyte,et al.  Managing change in the delivery of complex projects: Configuration management, asset information and 'big data' , 2016 .

[44]  Saixing Zeng,et al.  Intelligent data analytics is here to change engineering management , 2017 .

[45]  K. Leung,et al.  Beyond Risk-Taking , 2014 .

[46]  Vivian W. Y Tam,et al.  Quality improvement in construction by using a Vandermonde interpolation technique , 2007 .

[47]  P. Shapira,et al.  MORE IS LESS? THE CURVILINEAR EFFECTS OF POLITICAL TIES ON CORPORATE INNOVATION PERFORMANCE , 2019 .

[48]  Wenshun Wang,et al.  Influence mechanism of job satisfaction and positive affect on knowledge sharing among project members , 2019, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management.

[49]  Gary R. Thurgood,et al.  Structural interdependence in teams: An integrative framework and meta-analysis. , 2015, The Journal of applied psychology.

[50]  Qing Hu,et al.  Assimilation of Enterprise Systems: The Effect of Institutional Pressures and the Mediating Role of Top Management , 2007, MIS Q..

[51]  Benjamin T. Hazen,et al.  Big data and predictive analytics for supply chain and organizational performance , 2017 .

[52]  S. Zeng,et al.  Bridging the gaps or fecklessness? A moderated mediating examination of intermediaries’ effects on corporate innovation , 2020, Technovation.