What characteristics a clinical CSF system has to have

Corresponding author: lissolio@herrera.unt.edu.arWe discuss the characteristics a system to measure the contrast sensitivity function (CSF) inthe ophthalmologic clinic has to have. We propose that this system should be computer basedin order to assure flexibility and precision. Besides the original calibration, this equipment needsan auxiliary system to keep the working conditions allowing periodical gamma corrections. Wetry a calibration method based on visual comparisons and show that it is valid and simple.We propose to use an adaptive psychophysical method to obtain contrast thresholds thatassure a good compromise between precision and duration of the whole test. Finally, we proposethat the system has to have its own normality curves for the different age ranges allowingthe practitioner to perform clinical evaluations. Summing up, we can say that taking into accountthe above issues, the fidelity of the stimuli will be guaranteed and the challenges entailed in itstransference to the clinic will be overcome.Keywords: contrast sensitivity, ophthalmologic clinic, standards.

[1]  A. Watson,et al.  Quest: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  K E Higgins,et al.  Spatial contrast sensitivity: effects of age, test-retest, and psychophysical method. , 1988, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[3]  J. Morrison,et al.  Relationship between visual field loss and contrast threshold elevation in glaucoma , 2005, BMC ophthalmology.

[4]  F. W. Campbell,et al.  Why do we measure contrast sensitivity? , 1983, Behavioural Brain Research.

[5]  V Zemon,et al.  Contrast sensitivity testing: A more complete assessment of vision , 1989, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[6]  A. Watson,et al.  The method of constant stimuli is inefficient , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  Elisa M. Colombo,et al.  Visual calibration of CRT monitors , 2001 .

[8]  I. Kaiserman,et al.  Contrast sensitivity after wave front-guided LASIK. , 2004, Ophthalmology.

[9]  S J Leat,et al.  What is low vision? A re-evaluation of definitions. , 1999, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[10]  Edoardo Midena,et al.  Mitomycin C modulation of corneal wound healing after photorefractive keratectomy in highly myopic eyes. , 2005, Ophthalmology.

[11]  C A Hazel,et al.  The usefulness of Vistech and FACT contrast sensitivity charts for cataract and refractive surgery outcomes research , 2003, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[12]  G. Rubin RELIABILITY AND SENSITIVITY OF CLINICAL CONTRAST SENSITIVITY TESTS , 1988 .

[13]  Lawrence E. Arend,et al.  Response of the human eye to spatially sinusoidal gratings at various exposure durations , 1976, Vision Research.

[14]  A P Ginsburg,et al.  Large‐Sample Norms for Contrast Sensitivity , 1984, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[15]  J M Woodhouse,et al.  THE USE OF COMPUTERIZED CONTRAST SENSITIVITY, ARDEN GRATINGS AND LOW CONTRAST LETTER CHARTS IN THE ASSESSMENT OF AMBLYOPIA , 1987, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[16]  Luis Issolio,et al.  Brightness perception under transient glare conditions with myopic observers wearing contact lenses and spectacles , 2001, Iberoamerican Meeting of Optics and the Latin American Meeting of Optics, Lasers and Their Applications.

[17]  Gunilla Haegerstrom-Portnoy,et al.  Face Recognition in the Elderly , 2005, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[18]  R. Näsänen Spatial frequency bandwidth used in the recognition of facial images , 1999, Vision Research.

[19]  K. Tuppurainen,et al.  Cataract in traffic , 1999, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[20]  E Peli,et al.  Luminance artifacts of cathode-ray tube displays for vision research. , 2001, Spatial vision.

[21]  David Travis,et al.  Effective Color Displays: Theory and Practice , 1991 .

[22]  M. Cox,et al.  The effect of surround luminance on measurements of contrast sensitivity , 1999, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[23]  A J Bron,et al.  Contrast sensitivity and visual disability in chronic simple glaucoma. , 1984, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[24]  Arthur P Ginsburg,et al.  Advances in microincision cataract surgery intraocular lenses , 2006, Current opinion in ophthalmology.

[25]  R. Sekuler,et al.  Contrast sensitivity throughout adulthood , 1982, Vision Research.

[26]  G. Woo Contrast sensitivity function as a diagnostic tool in low vision. , 1985, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[27]  A P Ginsburg,et al.  A New Contrast Sensitivity Vision Test Chart , 1984, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[28]  I L Bailey,et al.  The Design and Use of a New Near‐Vision Chart , 1980, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[29]  C W Tyler,et al.  Colour bit-stealing to enhance the luminance resolution of digital displays on a single pixel basis. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[30]  R. Steinert Vision function versus vision testing. , 2006, Ophthalmology.

[31]  D Whitaker,et al.  Contrast sensitivity and glare sensitivity changes with three types of cataract morphology: are these techniques necessary in a clinical evaluation of cataract? , 1989, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[32]  D Regan,et al.  Low-contrast letter charts as a test of visual function. , 1983, Ophthalmology.

[33]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  Accurate control of contrast on microcomputer displays , 1991, Vision Research.

[34]  W. Charman,et al.  Mesopic contrast sensitivity function after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. , 2002, Journal of refractive surgery.

[35]  G B Arden,et al.  The importance of measuring contrast sensitivity in cases of visual disturbance. , 1978, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[36]  Avi C. Naiman,et al.  Spatial nonlinearities of gray-scale CRT pixels , 1992, Electronic Imaging.

[37]  Amiram Grinvald,et al.  Iso-orientation domains in cat visual cortex are arranged in pinwheel-like patterns , 1991, Nature.

[38]  R. Sekuler,et al.  Aging and low-contrast vision: face perception. , 1981, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[39]  J. Sparrow,et al.  Use of vision tests in clinical decision making about cataract surgery: results of a national survey , 2000, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[40]  Clinical detection of abnormalities in central vision in chronic simple glaucoma using contrast sensitivity , 1985, International Ophthalmology.

[41]  S. Leat,et al.  Clinical Testing of Contrast Sensitivity in Children: Age-related Norms and Validity , 2004, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[42]  D Regan,et al.  Contrast sensitivity, visual acuity and the discrimination of Snellen letters in multiple sclerosis. , 1981, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[43]  Isabel de la Fuente,et al.  Influence of surround illumination on pupil size and contrast sensitivity , 2004, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[44]  Arthur P. Ginsburg,et al.  Contrast Sensitivity and Functional Vision , 2003, International ophthalmology clinics.

[45]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  THE DESIGN OF A NEW LETTER CHART FOR MEASURING CONTRAST SENSITIVITY , 1988 .

[46]  J. Lovasik,et al.  Laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia and the contrast sensitivity function , 2004, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[47]  C. Owsley,et al.  Contrast sensitivity, acuity, and the perception of 'real-world' targets. , 1987, The British journal of ophthalmology.