Photostress Recovery Time after Flash-Lighting Is Increased in Myopic Eyes

Background: It is well-known that non-pathological axial myopic eyes present physiological and functional differences in comparison with emmetropic eyes due to altered retinal anatomy. Photostress tests have shown very significant capabilities to discriminate a normal retina from an abnormal retina. Accordingly, the aim of this work was to investigate the differences between myopic and emmetropic eyes in the measured photostress recovery time (PSRT) after retinal light-flashing in a population of young healthy subjects. Methods: A coaxial illumination total disability glare instrument was employed to measure the recovery time after photostress was induced by a 240 milliseconds flash-lighting (535 nm) exposure on 66 myopic and 66 emmetropic eyes. The measurements were carried out for different combinations of glare angles and contrasts of the visual stimuli. Results: In general terms, PSRT in myopic eyes was found at a statistically higher than in emmetropic eyes (Bonferroni correction). For both groups, the measured recovery strongly depends on the contrast of the test object used to measure baseline recovery function and markedly less on the source of glare angles explored. When the PSRTs obtained for different glare angles are averaged, the differences between PSRTs drastically increase with the reduction in the contrast of the stimuli between both groups of study. Conclusions: PSRT is higher for myopic than for young healthy emmetropic eyes (1.2 s and 0.2 s for 5% and 100% contrast test object, respectively). Though seemingly small, the magnitude of this finding can be relevant when flash-lighting happens while driving a car or while performing actions where the reaction time after a visual stimulus can be critical.

[1]  Francisco J. Ávila,et al.  Optical instrument for the study of time recovery from total disability glare vision. , 2022, Applied optics.

[2]  S. Boadi-Kusi,et al.  Disability glare and nighttime driving performance among commercial drivers in Ghana , 2021, Journal of occupational health.

[3]  J. Jonas,et al.  Advances in myopia research anatomical findings in highly myopic eyes , 2020, Eye and Vision.

[4]  Pádraig J. Mulholland,et al.  Altered spatial summation optimizes visual function in axial myopia , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[5]  G. Wallstrom,et al.  An Alternative Psychophysical Diagnostic Indicator of the Aging Eye , 2019, Journal of ophthalmology.

[6]  S. Saw,et al.  Iris colour in relation to myopia among Chinese school‐aged children , 2018, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[7]  J. Jonas,et al.  Retinal pigment epithelium cell density in relationship to axial length in human eyes , 2017, Acta ophthalmologica.

[8]  B. Hammond Attenuating Photostress and Glare Disability in Pseudophakic Patients through the Addition of a Short-Wave Absorbing Filter , 2015, Journal of ophthalmology.

[9]  Laura M. Fletcher,et al.  A double-blind, placebo-controlled study on the effects of lutein and zeaxanthin on photostress recovery, glare disability, and chromatic contrast. , 2014, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[10]  Gholam A. Peyman,et al.  Photostress Testing Device for Diagnosing Retinal Disease , 2014 .

[11]  P. Connell,et al.  SUITABILITY AND REPEATABILITY OF A PHOTOSTRESS RECOVERY TEST DEVICE, THE MACULAR DEGENERATION DETECTOR (MDD-2), FOR DIABETES AND DIABETIC RETINOPATHY ASSESSMENT , 2014, Retina.

[12]  Ankit Mathur,et al.  Influences of luminance and accommodation stimuli on pupil size and pupil center location. , 2014, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[13]  António M. G. Baptista,et al.  The macular photostress test in diabetes, glaucoma, and cataract , 2013, Iberoamerican Meeting of Optics and the Latin American Meeting of Optics, Lasers and Their Applications.

[14]  G. Richard,et al.  Mesopic Pupil Size in a Refractive Surgery Population (13,959 Eyes) , 2012, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[15]  Jost B. Jonas,et al.  Scleral Thickness in Human Eyes , 2012, PloS one.

[16]  Seang-Mei Saw,et al.  Worldwide prevalence and risk factors for myopia , 2012, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[17]  K. Mashige Night vision and glare vision thresholds and recovery time in myopic and hyperopic eyes , 2010 .

[18]  N. Çağıl,et al.  Refractive Error May Influence Mesopic Pupil Size , 2010, Current eye research.

[19]  Ian A Sigal,et al.  Dimensions of the human sclera: Thickness measurement and regional changes with axial length. , 2009, Experimental eye research.

[20]  W Neil Charman,et al.  Accommodation, pupil diameter and myopia , 2009, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[21]  R. Anderson,et al.  Investigation of changes in the myopic retina using multifocal electroretinograms, optical coherence tomography and peripheral resolution acuity , 2008, Vision Research.

[22]  Nancy J. Coletta,et al.  Effect of myopia on visual acuity measured with laser interference fringes , 2006, Vision Research.

[23]  F. Eperjesi,et al.  Reliability, normative data, and the effect of age‐related macular disease on the Eger Macular Stressometer photostress recovery time , 2004, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[24]  Jay M Enoch,et al.  The relationship between the Stiles–Crawford effect of the first kind (SCE‐I) and myopia , 2003, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[25]  David W. Thomson,et al.  Sources of variability in the clinical photostress test , 2002, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[26]  S. Liou,et al.  Myopia and contrast sensitivity function , 2001, Current eye research.

[27]  Arthur Bradley,et al.  The role of neural and optical factors in limiting visual resolution in myopia , 1998, Vision Research.

[28]  S. Awaya,et al.  Extrafoveal photostress recovery testing with a scanning laser ophthalmoscope. , 1997, Japanese journal of ophthalmology.

[29]  E. Midena,et al.  Macular function impairment in eyes with early age-related macular degeneration. , 1997, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[30]  R. Kardon,et al.  The pupil photostress test. , 1994, Ophthalmology.

[31]  J. Weiter,et al.  The macular photostress test in diabetic retinopathy and age-related macular degeneration. , 1990, Archives of ophthalmology.

[32]  P. Henkind,et al.  Photostress recovery in chronic open angle glaucoma. , 1988, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[33]  F. Gómez-Ulla,et al.  Macular dazzling test on normal subjects. , 1986, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[34]  J. Lovasik An electrophysiological investigation of the macular photostress test. , 1983, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[35]  J. C. Dean Hart,et al.  Photostress Recovery Times in Cases of Central Serous Retinopathy 1 , 1980, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[36]  R. Knighton,et al.  The photostress recovery test in the clinical assessment of visual function. , 1977, American journal of ophthalmology.

[37]  B. Brown,et al.  Glare recovery and age related maculopathy , 1989 .

[38]  Brian Brown,et al.  Glare recovery and its relation to other clinical findings in age related maculopathy , 1989 .

[39]  L. Weiss Beiträge zur Anatomie des myopischen Auges , 1882 .