Exploring the impact game-based learning has on classroom environment and student engagement within an engineering product design class

Active learning has been shown to improve student learning outcomes while enabling students to be engaged in their learning process. One form of active learning that is growing in its application within engineering undergraduate classes is the use of game-based learning. This study utilized two class sections (control vs. experimental) to determine the impact that game-based learning could have on students' perceptions of the classroom environment and their engagement with class content. Utilizing the College and University Classroom Environment Inventory (CUCEI) and a selection of questions from the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) the authors were able to assess whether game-based learning modified the way students viewed the Introduction to Chemical Product Design course. Preliminary results demonstrated that the game-based learning class rated the classroom environment higher on all seven dimensions. In particular, a statistically significant difference was achieved on the personalization dimension through use of a t-test and the non-parametric Mann Whitney test although this was no longer significant after accounting for multiple comparisons. In addition, students in the game-based learning class felt that they developed key professional skills such as oral communication, ability to work effectively with others and to solve complex or real world problems. These results are indicative that game-based learning is a pedagogy that can be applied within engineering and may lead to a more positive classroom environment and student experience.

[1]  Muhammad Ghatala,et al.  A Simulation Approach To Construction Management Education , 2009 .

[2]  Michelle K. Smith,et al.  Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Lennart E. Nacke,et al.  From game design elements to gamefulness: defining "gamification" , 2011, MindTrek.

[4]  Jorge J. Wellmann The National Survey of Student Engagement , 2010 .

[5]  Sahana Murthy,et al.  Effect of think-pair-share in a large CS1 class: 83% sustained engagement , 2013, ICER.

[6]  David F. Treagust,et al.  Validity and use of an instrument for assessing classroom psychosocial environment in higher education , 1986 .

[7]  K. Squire,et al.  HARNESSING THE POWER OF GAMES IN EDUCATION , 2003 .

[8]  Cheryl A. Bodnar,et al.  Engineers at Play: Games as Teaching Tools for Undergraduate Engineering Students , 2016 .

[9]  Margie Martyn,et al.  Clickers in the Classroom: An Active Learning Approach. , 2007 .

[10]  Jeremy F. Strayer How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation , 2012 .

[11]  E. Esposito,et al.  Using business games to enhance engineering students capacity for individual and social awareness , 2002, IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.

[12]  Jane E Caldwell,et al.  Clickers in the large classroom: current research and best-practice tips. , 2007, CBE life sciences education.

[13]  Jeff Fant,et al.  Tap: Technology Awareness Program Adventures In Wireless Telecommunications , 2001 .

[14]  Arianne M. Dantas,et al.  Promoting student-centered active learning in lectures with a personal response system. , 2009, Advances in physiology education.

[15]  Marina Fruehauf,et al.  Encyclopedia Of Research Design , 2016 .

[16]  Raymond Migneco,et al.  Web-based sound and music games with activities for STEM education , 2009, 2009 International IEEE Consumer Electronics Society's Games Innovations Conference.

[17]  A. Leung,et al.  Building life-long learning capacity in undergraduate nursing freshmen within an integrative and small group learning context. , 2013, Nurse education today.

[18]  J. Gee,et al.  Video Games and the Future of Learning , 2005 .

[19]  André van der Hoek,et al.  An experimental card game for teaching software engineering processes , 2005, J. Syst. Softw..

[20]  Stefanie P Ferreri,et al.  Redesign of a Large Lecture Course Into a Small-Group Learning Course , 2013, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education.

[21]  Juan Carlos Huerta,et al.  Getting Active in the Large Lecture , 2007 .

[22]  J. McGonigal Reality Is Broken: Why Games Make Us Better and How They Can Change the World , 2011 .

[23]  A. Cetin A 3D game based learning application in engineering education: Powering a recreational boat with renewable energy sources , 2012, 2012 15th International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL).

[24]  Michael J. Prince,et al.  Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research , 2004 .