Trait interactions help explain plant invasion success in the German flora

1 The search for characteristics that promote invasion success constitutes one of the most challenging tasks in invasion ecology. So far the main focus in multispecies studies of plant invasion success has been on single traits. Only few generalizations have emerged from this work and single traits yielded very limited explanatory power for invasion success. Here we hypothesize that the consideration of ecological strategies, determined by different combinations of traits, will improve explanatory power. 2 To test this hypothesis we analysed the relative importance of 40 traits for species’ invasion success in the German neophytic flora. Success was expressed as map grid cell frequency. After quantifying the relevance of single traits, we quantified the importance of different trait combinations for invasion success by calculating a multiple trait model, with explicit consideration of trait interactions. In all analyses we considered the effects of phylogeny. 3 In general, neither single traits nor phylogenetic relatedness held much explanatory power. In contrast, the amount of variation explained in the multiple trait model was distinctly higher, mainly due to the incorporation of trait interactions. Thus, particular combinations of trait attributes rather than distinctive attributes per se appear to be associated with invasion success. 4 In single trait analysis, traits associated with flowering and reproductive biology, and with ecological tolerance and the residence time of the species were significantly associated with invasion success. Multiple trait analysis revealed that the relationship between the length of flowering season and invasion success was contingent upon pollination modes. Moreover, the success of polyploids and of species with certain vegetative reproductive trait attributes depended on the species’ flowering phenology. 5 Synthesis. Our results indicate that different ecological strategies, determined by particular combinations of traits, can facilitate plant invasion success. Our findings highlight the importance of incorporating trait interactions when testing for characteristics that promote plant invasion success. Improved explanatory power of traits suggests that our new approach can provide an important step forward in the risk assessment and management of new arrivals in regional floras.

[1]  Petr Pyšek,et al.  Traits Associated with Invasiveness in Alien Plants: Where Do we Stand? , 2008 .

[2]  M. Vilà,et al.  The comparative analysis of historical alien introductions , 2008, Biological Invasions.

[3]  M. van Kleunen,et al.  Effects of Self‐Compatibility on the Distribution Range of Invasive European Plants in North America , 2007, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[4]  A. Moles,et al.  A new framework for predicting invasive plant species , 2007 .

[5]  J. Dukes,et al.  Plant invasion across space and time: factors affecting nonindigenous species success during four stages of invasion. , 2007, The New phytologist.

[6]  A. Latimer,et al.  Invasive plants and their ecological strategies: prediction and explanation of woody plant invasion in New England , 2007 .

[7]  C. Violle,et al.  Let the concept of trait be functional , 2007 .

[8]  Pedro R. Peres-Neto,et al.  A UNIFIED STRATEGY FOR ESTIMATING AND CONTROLLING SPATIAL, TEMPORAL AND PHYLOGENETIC AUTOCORRELATION IN ECOLOGICAL MODELS , 2006 .

[9]  José Alexandre Felizola Diniz-Filho,et al.  Factors influencing changes in trait correlations across species after using phylogenetic independent contrasts , 2006, Evolutionary Ecology.

[10]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Plant Strategies, Vegetation Processes, and Ecosystem Properties , 2006 .

[11]  D. Richardson,et al.  Plant invasions: merging the concepts of species invasiveness and community invasibility , 2006 .

[12]  Mark Westoby,et al.  Land-plant ecology on the basis of functional traits. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[13]  M. Cadotte,et al.  Evolutionary and ecological influences of plant invader success in the flora of Ontario , 2006 .

[14]  M. Pandit Continuing the search for pattern among rare plants: are diploid species more likely to be rare? , 2006 .

[15]  M. Cadotte,et al.  Ecological Patterns and Biological Invasions: Using Regional Species Inventories in Macroecology , 2006, Biological Invasions.

[16]  M. Cadotte,et al.  Life‐history correlates of plant invasiveness at regional and continental scales , 2005 .

[17]  T. Garland,et al.  Phylogenetic approaches in comparative physiology , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[18]  Frédéric Médail,et al.  Species attributes and invasion success by alien plants on Mediterranean islands , 2005 .

[19]  Marco Vighi,et al.  ALARM: Assessing LArge-scale environmental Risks for biodiversity with tested Methods , 2005 .

[20]  Harold A. Mooney,et al.  Ecology of invasive plants: state of the art. , 2005 .

[21]  P. Pyšek,et al.  Residence time determines the distribution of alien plants , 2005 .

[22]  I. Kühn,et al.  Why do alien plant species that reproduce in natural habitats occur more frequently? , 2004 .

[23]  S. Johnson,et al.  Breeding systems of invasive alien plants in South Africa: does Baker's rule apply? , 2004 .

[24]  D. Mark Plant invasions: Ecological threats and management solutions , 2004 .

[25]  F. Lloret,et al.  Local and regional abundance of exotic plant species on Mediterranean islands: are species traits important? , 2004 .

[26]  Mark Westoby,et al.  A leaf-height-seed (LHS) plant ecology strategy scheme , 1998, Plant and Soil.

[27]  Douglas E. Soltis,et al.  Advances in the study of polyploidy since Plant speciation , 2003 .

[28]  P. Legendre,et al.  QUANTIFYING PHYLOGENETICALLY STRUCTURED ENVIRONMENTAL VARIATION , 2003, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[29]  CONTRASTING FLOWERING PHENOLOGY AND SPECIES RICHNESS IN ABIOTICALLY AND BIOTICALLY POLLINATED ANGIOSPERMS , 2003, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[30]  P. Reich,et al.  The Evolution of Plant Functional Variation: Traits, Spectra, and Strategies , 2003, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[31]  Sunil J Rao,et al.  Regression Modeling Strategies: With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic Regression, and Survival Analysis , 2003 .

[32]  B. Blair Plant Strategies, Vegetation Processes, and Ecosystem Properties.Second Edition.ByJ Philip Grime.Chichester (United Kingdom) and New York: John Wiley & Sons.$55.00 (paper). xxxvii + 417 p; ill.; species list and index. ISBN: 0–471–49601–4. 2001. , 2003 .

[33]  Christina Gloeckner,et al.  Modern Applied Statistics With S , 2003 .

[34]  P. M. Wade,et al.  The alien flora of Germany - basics from a new German database. , 2003 .

[35]  P. M. Wade,et al.  Temporal niche separation of the alien flora of Rome (Italy). , 2003 .

[36]  M. Pagel,et al.  Phylogenetic Analysis and Comparative Data: A Test and Review of Evidence , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[37]  M. Westoby,et al.  ECOLOGICAL STRATEGIES : Some Leading Dimensions of Variation Between Species , 2002 .

[38]  G. Quinn,et al.  Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists , 2002 .

[39]  Brian D. Ripley,et al.  Modern Applied Statistics with S Fourth edition , 2002 .

[40]  R. Verlaque,et al.  Invasive alien flora of France: Ecology, life-forms and polyploidy , 2002 .

[41]  F J Rohlf,et al.  COMPARATIVE METHODS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF CONTINUOUS VARIABLES: GEOMETRIC INTERPRETATIONS , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[42]  A. Genz,et al.  On the Numerical Availability of Multiple Comparison Procedures , 2001 .

[43]  B. Saugier Plant Strategies, Vegetation Processes, and Ecosystem Properties , 2001 .

[44]  H. Mooney,et al.  The evolutionary impact of invasive species , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  C. Kolar,et al.  Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. , 2001, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[46]  M. S. Hoddle,et al.  Population biology of invasive species. , 2001 .

[47]  J. Brock,et al.  A model for interpreting the process of invasion: crucial situations favouring special characteristics of invasive species. , 2001 .

[48]  D. Soltis,et al.  The role of genetic and genomic attributes in the success of polyploids. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[49]  D. Simberloff,et al.  BIOTIC INVASIONS: CAUSES, EPIDEMIOLOGY, GLOBAL CONSEQUENCES, AND CONTROL , 2000 .

[50]  C. J. West,et al.  Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions , 2000 .

[51]  Roland P. Carpenter,et al.  Experimental Design and Data Analysis , 2000 .

[52]  J. Diniz‐Filho,et al.  AN EIGENVECTOR METHOD FOR ESTIMATING PHYLOGENETIC INERTIA , 1998, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[53]  Thomas M. Smith,et al.  Plant functional types : their relevance to ecosystem properties and global change , 1998 .

[54]  Peter H. Westfall,et al.  Multiple Testing of General Contrasts Using Logical Constraints and Correlations , 1997 .

[55]  Michelle R. Leishman,et al.  Categorizing plant species into functional types , 1997 .

[56]  Mark Williamson,et al.  The characters of successful invaders , 1996 .

[57]  James Woodward,et al.  Biological invasions as global environmental change , 1996 .

[58]  K. Thompson,et al.  Native and alien invasive plants: more of the same? , 1995 .

[59]  Michelle R. Leishman,et al.  On misinterpreting the phylogenetic correction , 1995 .

[60]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[61]  P. Pyšek,et al.  Relating invasion success to plant traits: an analysis of the Czech alien flora. , 1995 .

[62]  D. Lodge,et al.  Biological invasions: Lessons for ecology. , 1993, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[63]  M. Pagel,et al.  The comparative method in evolutionary biology , 1991 .

[64]  Graham Bell,et al.  A Comparative Method , 1989, The American Naturalist.

[65]  N. D. Pidgen,et al.  The Comparative Method , 1987 .

[66]  I. Noble,et al.  Ecological and physiological characters of invading species. , 1986 .

[67]  J. Felsenstein Phylogenies and the Comparative Method , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[68]  S. Hurlbert Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments , 1984 .

[69]  D. Whitehead CHAPTER 5 – Wind Pollination: Some Ecological and Evolutionary Perspectives , 1983 .

[70]  D. Rabinowitz,et al.  Phenological Properties of Wind‐ and Insect‐Pollinated Prairie Plants , 1981 .

[71]  D. Whitehead WIND POLLINATION IN THE ANGIOSPERMS: EVOLUTIONARY AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS , 1969, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[72]  H. G. Baker SUPPORT FOR BAKER'S LAW—AS A RULE , 1967, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[73]  H. G. Baker,et al.  SELF‐COMPATIBILITY AND ESTABLISHMENT AFTER ‘“LONG‐DISTANCE” DISPERSAL , 1955 .

[74]  Peter Yeo,et al.  Natural history of pollination , 1947 .

[75]  A. Bennett The Origin of Species by means of Natural Selection; or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life , 1872, Nature.

[76]  C. Darwin The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, Or, The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life , 2019 .