On the Brain Response to Syntactic Anomalies: Manipulations of Word Position and Word Class Reveal Individual Differences

In two experiments, event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were recorded from 13 scalp locations while subjects read sentences containing a syntactically or a semantically anomalous word. The position (sentence-embedded vs sentence-final) and word class (open vs closed) of the syntactic anomalies were manipulated. In both experiments, semantically anomalous words elicited an enhanced N400 component. Syntactically anomalous closed class words elicited a widely distributed late positive wave (P600) regardless of the word's position and a smaller negative-going effect that was largest over anterior sites when the anomaly occurred in sentence-final position. The response to syntactically anomalous open class words revealed striking qualitative individual differences: These words elicited a P600 response in the majority of subjects and an N400 response in others. The proportion of subjects exhibiting the N400 response was greater when the anomaly occurred in sentence-final position. These results are interpreted in the context of prior findings, and implications for the hypothesis that syntactic and semantic anomalies elicit distinct brain potentials are discussed.

[1]  Mark Steedman,et al.  On the order of words , 1982 .

[2]  Christopher K. Riesbeck,et al.  Comprehension by computer : expectation-based analysis of sentences in context , 1976 .

[3]  R. Berndt,et al.  Semantic and syntactic processes in aphasia: a review of the literature. , 1978, Psychological bulletin.

[4]  M A Just,et al.  A theory of reading: from eye fixations to comprehension. , 1980, Psychological review.

[5]  Hans-Jochen Heinze,et al.  Dissociation of Brain Activity Related to Syntactic and Semantic Aspects of Language , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[6]  I Bretherton,et al.  Content and context in early lexical development , 1981, Journal of Child Language.

[7]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  Studies in the perception of language , 1982 .

[8]  M. Kutas,et al.  Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association , 1984, Nature.

[9]  M. Just,et al.  Working memory constraints on the processing of syntactic ambiguity , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[10]  H. Neville,et al.  Fractionating language: different neural subsystems with different sensitive periods. , 1992, Cerebral cortex.

[11]  P. Holcomb Automatic and attentional processing: An event-related brain potential analysis of semantic priming , 1988, Brain and Language.

[12]  C. C. Wood,et al.  Event-related potentials, lexical decision and semantic priming. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[13]  S. Geisser,et al.  On methods in the analysis of profile data , 1959 .

[14]  M. Garrett,et al.  Syntactically Based Sentence Processing Classes: Evidence from Event-Related Brain Potentials , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Event-related brain potentials. , 1990 .

[16]  M. Rugg,et al.  Electrophysiology of Mind. , 1996 .

[17]  Vicka R. Corey,et al.  On the Language Specificity of the Brain Response to Syntactic Anomalies: Is the Syntactic Positive Shift a Member of the P300 Family? , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[18]  M. Just,et al.  Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory , 1991 .

[19]  K. Nelson,et al.  Structure and strategy in learning to talk. , 1973 .

[20]  R Kakigi,et al.  [Event-related brain potentials]. , 1997, Nihon rinsho. Japanese journal of clinical medicine.

[21]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.

[22]  Michael W. Eysenck,et al.  A handbook of cognitive psychology , 1984 .

[23]  H. Neville,et al.  Natural speech processing: An analysis using event-related brain potentials , 1991, Psychobiology.

[24]  Lee Osterhout,et al.  Constraints on Movement Phenomena in Sentence Processing: Evidence from Event-related Brain Potentials , 1996 .

[25]  Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al.  Linguistic Structure in Language Processing , 1988 .

[26]  Allan Collins,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing , 1975 .

[27]  P. Lightbown,et al.  Structure and variation in child language. , 1975 .

[28]  M. Kutas,et al.  Event-related brain potentials to semantically inappropriate and surprisingly large words , 1980, Biological Psychology.

[29]  M. Kutas,et al.  Event-related brain potentials during initial encoding and recognition memory of congruous and incongruous words , 1986 .

[30]  D. Caplan,et al.  Biological studies of mental processes , 1981 .

[31]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  The syntactic positive shift (sps) as an erp measure of syntactic processing , 1993 .

[32]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Effects of sentential stress and word class upon comprehension in Broca's aphasics , 1980, Brain and Language.

[33]  P. Holcomb,et al.  Event related potentials and language comprehension. , 1995 .

[34]  B. Leupen,et al.  Design and analysis , 1997 .

[35]  G. Keppel,et al.  Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook , 1976 .

[36]  Myrna F Schwartz,et al.  The word order problem in agrammatism II. Production , 1980, Brain and Language.

[37]  Susan M. Garnsey Event-related brain potentials in the study of language: An introduction , 1993 .

[38]  J. Fodor The Modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology , 1986 .

[39]  H. Jasper,et al.  The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation. The International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. , 1999, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[40]  I Bretherton,et al.  Individual differences at 20 months: analytic and holistic strategies in language acquisition , 1983, Journal of Child Language.

[41]  B. MacWhinney,et al.  Cue validity and sentence interpretation in English, German, and Italian , 1984 .

[42]  David Caplan,et al.  A note on the “word-order problem” in agrammatism , 1983, Brain and Language.

[43]  M. Just,et al.  From the SelectedWorks of Marcel Adam Just 1992 A capacity theory of comprehension : Individual differences in working memory , 2017 .

[44]  H. J. Eysenck,et al.  Advances in psychophysiology: J.R. Jennings, P.K. Ackles & M.G.H. Coles (Eds) Vol.5 (1993).320 pp. £42.50 (hardback). ISBN 185302 191 1 , 1994 .

[45]  R. Verleger Event-related potentials and cognition: A critique of the context updating hypothesis and an alternative interpretation of P3 , 1988, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[46]  G. Altmann Cognitive models of speech processing , 1991 .

[47]  M. Bowerman Commentary on L. Bloom, P. Lightbown, & L. Hood, “Structure and variation in child language” , 1975 .

[48]  Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al.  Natural language parsing: Do listeners compute linguistic representations? , 1985 .

[49]  D. Swinney,et al.  Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences: evidence of the application of verb information during parsing. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[50]  Merrill F. Garrett,et al.  Sentence processing , 1990 .

[51]  Y. Grodzinsky Language deficits and the theory of syntax , 1986, Brain and Language.

[52]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading between the lines: Event-related brain potentials during natural sentence processing , 1980, Brain and Language.

[53]  W Cowart,et al.  Notes on the biology of syntactic processing , 1989, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[54]  H. Jasper Report of the committee on methods of clinical examination in electroencephalography , 1958 .

[55]  P. Holcomb Semantic priming and stimulus degradation: implications for the role of the N400 in language processing. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[56]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  The Processing Nature of the N400: Evidence from Masked Priming , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[57]  J. Elman Representation and structure in connectionist models , 1991 .

[58]  Lee Osterhout,et al.  Event-related potentials and syntactic anomaly: Evidence of anomaly detection during the perception of continuous speech , 1993 .

[59]  Albert M. Galaburda,et al.  From Reading to Neurons , 1990, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[60]  W. Cowart Familial Sinistrality and Syntactic Processing , 1988 .

[61]  C. Clifton,et al.  Comprehending Sentences with Long-Distance Dependencies , 1989 .

[62]  P. Holcomb,et al.  Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly , 1992 .

[63]  H. Neville,et al.  Language and , 2019, Adventure Diffusion.

[64]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  The interaction of syntax and semantics during sentence processing: eye movements in the analysis of semantically biased sentences , 1983 .

[65]  L. Osterhout,et al.  Event-Related Brain Potentials Elicited by Failure to Agree , 1995 .

[66]  R. Berwick,et al.  The role of grammars in models of language use , 1983, Cognition.

[67]  E. Donchin,et al.  Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? , 1988, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[68]  A. Friederici,et al.  Event-related brain potentials during natural speech processing: effects of semantic, morphological and syntactic violations. , 1993, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[69]  Anja Hahne,et al.  Event-Related Brain Potentials While Encountering Semantic and Syntactic Constraint Violations , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.