Using wikis for effective peer assessment

In 2009, Curtin University began offering a Bachelor of Education (Primary) program fully online apart from practicum school placements. At Curtin, the Bachelor of Education course has the same structure and units regardless of whether it is taught on campus, regionally or online. The units match in content and assessment and all use Blackboard as the Learning Management System (LMS). For online students, the LMS is the sole source of unit information, documentation submission of assessments and interactions between the students, the teachers and the content and considerable thought has been given to assisting student development in the use of technology and optimising the likelihood of active engagement. Contrary to initial expectations, not all students were technologically sophisticated. Indeed many students were tentative—frightened that they would break something—and generally nervous about learning technologies. To engage students in the learning process, the decision was made to incorporate a wiki, TypeWithMe, into the group assignment. It was hoped that the wiki would benefit students in their group work and the peer assessments aspect of one of their assessments. The results indicated that even though students had concerns regarding their technological ability, they reported that TypeWithMe was easy to use and assisted in both their group work and peer assessment.

[1]  Ken Stevens,et al.  Factors influencing perceived usefulness of wikis for group collaborative learning by first year students , 2011 .

[2]  Stephanie D. Teasley,et al.  The Construction of Shared Knowledge in Collaborative Problem Solving , 1995 .

[3]  D. Boud,et al.  Peer Learning and Assessment , 1999 .

[4]  D. Gash E-moderating: the key to teaching and learning online , 2012 .

[5]  K. Topping Peer Assessment Between Students in Colleges and Universities , 1998 .

[6]  D. Garrison,et al.  A Transactional Perspective on Teaching and Learning: A Framework for Adult and Higher Education. Advances in Learning and Instruction Series. , 2000 .

[7]  Rena M. Palloff,et al.  Assessing the Online Learner: Resources and Strategies for Faculty , 2008 .

[8]  Nicole A. Buzzetto-More,et al.  Best Practices in e-Assessment , 2006, J. Inf. Technol. Educ..

[9]  D. Randy Garrison,et al.  Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education , 1999, Internet High. Educ..

[10]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[11]  Bautista Liébana,et al.  RESEÑA de : Garrison, D.R.; Archar, W. A. Transactional perspective on teaching and learning : a framework for adult and higher education. Oxford : Pergamon, 2000 , 2002 .

[12]  J. B. Arbaugh,et al.  An Investigation of Epistemological and Social Dimensions of Teaching in Online Learning Environments , 2006 .

[13]  B. Rogoff,et al.  Learning Together: Children and Adults in a School Community , 2001 .

[14]  Wendy Drexler,et al.  The networked student model for construction of personal learning environments: Balancing teacher control and student autonomy , 2010 .

[15]  Andria Young,et al.  Assessing the quality of online courses from the students' perspective , 2006, Internet High. Educ..