Gender Differences in Early Career Performance Reviews: a Text Mining Study

It is well known that fewer women than men earn STEM degrees and persist in STEM careers. Since early career experiences affect career attrition, we investigate gender differences in early career performance reviews. Our analysis is enabled by a unique dataset, with nearly 6,000 performance reviews of undergraduate engineering students participating in co-operative internships. Text mining of workplace supervisor comments included in the reviews reveals several gender differences. Male students are more likely to be described as eager, efficient, and independent, whereas female students are perceived as thorough and collaborative. Moreover, male students are more likely to be asked to improve their interpersonal skills, whereas female students are more likely to receive suggestions to improve their business knowledge. Our results thus suggest that men and women are perceived differently in the STEM workplace from the beginning of their careers.

[1]  Alison T Wynn,et al.  Inside the Black Box of Organizational Life: The Gendered Language of Performance Assessment , 2020 .

[2]  Megan M. Palmer,et al.  Exploring gender bias in nursing evaluations of emergency medicine residents. , 2019, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[3]  J. Silvester,et al.  Statesmen or cheerleaders? Using topic modeling to examine gendered messages in narrative developmental feedback for leaders , 2019, The Leadership Quarterly.

[4]  David G. Smith,et al.  The Power of Language: Gender, Status, and Agency in Performance Evaluations , 2018, Sex Roles.

[5]  Lukasz Golab,et al.  Gender Differences in Undergraduate Engineering Applicants: A Text Mining Approach , 2018, EDM.

[6]  Mei-Hung Chiu,et al.  The Gender Gap in Science , 2018, Chemistry International.

[7]  V. Arora,et al.  Gender Differences in Attending Physicians' Feedback to Residents: A Qualitative Analysis. , 2017, Journal of graduate medical education.

[8]  Erin D. Reilly,et al.  Perceptions of Male and Female STEM Aptitude , 2017 .

[9]  Ming-Te Wang,et al.  Gender Gap in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM): Current Knowledge, Implications for Practice, Policy, and Future Directions , 2017, Educational psychology review.

[10]  Kuheli Dutt,et al.  Gender differences in recommendation letters for postdoctoral fellowships in geoscience , 2016 .

[11]  Brian Rubineau,et al.  Persistence Is Cultural: Professional Socialization and the Reproduction of Sex Segregation , 2016 .

[12]  Matthew Hunsinger,et al.  Female peers in small work groups enhance women's motivation, verbal participation, and career aspirations in engineering , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Jane Stout,et al.  Girls and Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics , 2014 .

[14]  Stéphane Brutus,et al.  Aligning or Inflating Your Leadership Self-Image? A Longitudinal Study of Responses to Peer Feedback in MBA Teams , 2012 .

[15]  J. Hunt,et al.  Why do Women Leave Science and Engineering? , 2010, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[16]  Patrick Ian Armstrong,et al.  Men and things, women and people: a meta-analysis of sex differences in interests. , 2009, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  W. Bruce Croft,et al.  Search Engines - Information Retrieval in Practice , 2009 .

[18]  Stuart J. Fairclough,et al.  Girls' and boys' perceptions of physical education teachers' feedback: Effects on performance and psychological responses , 2007, Journal of sports sciences.

[19]  K. Zegwaard,et al.  Perceptions of desirable graduate competencies for science and technology new graduates , 2006 .

[20]  S. Drudy,et al.  Gender Effects in Classroom Interaction: Data Collection, Self-Analysis and Reflection , 2002 .

[21]  Paul C. Burnett,et al.  Teacher Praise and Feedback and Students' Perceptions of the Classroom Environment , 2002 .

[22]  Joachim Tiedemann Gender-related beliefs of teachers in elementary school mathematics , 2000 .

[23]  K. Harber Feedback to minorities: evidence of a positive bias. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  M. G. Jones,et al.  Gender differences in teacher‐student interactions in science classrooms , 1990 .

[25]  Meghnad Desai,et al.  Men and Things , 1986 .

[26]  E Roseman,et al.  Collaborative Problem-Solving , 1985, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[27]  Lukasz Golab,et al.  Gender differences in work-integrated learning experiences of STEM students: From applications to evaluations , 2020 .

[28]  Lukasz Golab,et al.  Gender Differences in Work-Integrated Learning Assessments , 2019, EDM.

[29]  Antti Kauhanen,et al.  Gender Differences in Careers , 2015 .

[30]  Mark P. Zanna,et al.  Two brief interventions to mitigate a “chilly climate” transform women’s experience, relationships, and achievement in engineering. , 2014 .

[31]  Darcy Hango,et al.  Gender differences in science, technology, engineering, mathematics and computer science (STEM) programs at university , 2013 .

[32]  M. Heilman Gender stereotypes and workplace bias , 2012 .

[33]  J. Bois,et al.  Students’ Perceptions of Teacher Feedback and Physical Competence in Physical Education Classes: Gender Effects , 2006 .

[34]  Xu Song Gender Differences in Science , 2005 .

[35]  J. Lorber,et al.  The social construction of gender. , 1991 .

[36]  Rosabeth Moss Kanter,et al.  Some Effects of Proportions on Group Life , 1977 .