An Online P300 Brain–Computer Interface Based on Tactile Selective Attention of Somatosensory Electrical Stimulation

PurposeP300 component of event related potentials in response to visual and auditory stimulation has been widely used in brain–computer interfaces (BCI). In clinical applications, tactile stimulus based on somatosensory electrical stimulation is an alternative for patients with impaired vision or hearing. This study presents an online P300 BCI based on somatosensory electrical stimulation paradigm. P300 signals were elicited by tactile selective attention of electrical stimuli on four fingers.MethodsFifteen healthy subjects participated in this study. Participants’ task was to focus their attention on the target finger and count the number. The classification of P300 signals was performed by step-wise linear discriminate analysis.ResultsThe average classification accuracy of the somatosensory BCI was 79.81 ± 7.91%, with the information transfer rate at 4.9 ± 1.3 bits/min. The BCI performance on different time windows was also evaluated in the present study.ConclusionsOur results demonstrate the feasibility of employing somatosensory electrical stimuli to build a practical online P300 BCI without taxing the visual and auditory channel, providing a wider application prospect in clinical applications and daily life. We anticipate our diagram to be a starting point for more explorations on utilizing electrical somatosensory stimuli in conjunction with portable BCI for neural rehabilitation.

[1]  J R Wolpaw,et al.  EEG-Based Brain-Computer Interfaces. , 2017, Current opinion in biomedical engineering.

[2]  Ivo Käthner,et al.  An auditory multiclass brain-computer interface with natural stimuli: Usability evaluation with healthy participants and a motor impaired end user , 2015, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[3]  Shun-Hwa Wei,et al.  Investigating the Effects of Peripheral Electrical Stimulation on Corticomuscular Functional Connectivity Stroke Survivors , 2016, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[4]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  Brain–computer interfaces for communication and rehabilitation , 2016, Nature Reviews Neurology.

[5]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  P300-based brain-computer interface (BCI) event-related potentials (ERPs): People with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) vs. age-matched controls , 2015, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[6]  Mihaly Benda,et al.  Brain–Computer Interface Spellers: A Review , 2018, Brain sciences.

[7]  L. Cohen,et al.  Brain–machine interfaces in neurorehabilitation of stroke , 2015, Neurobiology of Disease.

[8]  Akio Kimura,et al.  Efficacy of brain-computer interface-driven neuromuscular electrical stimulation for chronic paresis after stroke. , 2014, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[9]  Shoji Makino,et al.  P300 responses classification improvement in tactile BCI with touch-sense glove , 2014, Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (APSIPA), 2014 Asia-Pacific.

[10]  M A Hughes.  Engineering brain-computer interfaces: past, present and future. , 2014, Journal of neurosurgical sciences.

[11]  Akinari Onishi,et al.  Overlapped Partitioning for Ensemble Classifiers of P300-Based Brain-Computer Interfaces , 2014, PloS one.

[12]  Ithabi S. Gantner,et al.  A Vibrotactile P300-Based Brain–Computer Interface for Consciousness Detection and Communication , 2014, Clinical EEG and neuroscience.

[13]  Karunesh Ganguly,et al.  Effects of somatosensory electrical stimulation on motor function and cortical oscillations , 2017, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[14]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  Brain-computer interface (BCI) evaluation in people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis , 2014, Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis & frontotemporal degeneration.

[15]  V. Reggie Edgerton,et al.  Enhancing Nervous System Recovery through Neurobiologics, Neural Interface Training, and Neurorehabilitation , 2016, Front. Neurosci..

[16]  Max Ortiz-Catalan.  Restoration of somatosensory perception via electrical stimulation of peripheral nerves , 2018, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[17]  Tae-Seong Kim,et al.  A P300-based brain computer interface system for words typing , 2014, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[18]  An H. Do,et al.  The feasibility of a brain-computer interface functional electrical stimulation system for the restoration of overground walking after paraplegia , 2015, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[19]  Benjamin Blankertz,et al.  Classification of Eye Fixation Related Potentials for Variable Stimulus Saliency , 2016, Front. Neurosci..

[20]  Gernot R. Müller-Putz,et al.  Effects of mental workload and fatigue on the P300, alpha and theta band power during operation of an ERP (P300) brain–computer interface , 2014, Biological Psychology.

[21]  Christoph Pokorny,et al.  A hybrid three-class brain-computer interface system utilizing SSSEPs and transient ERPs. , 2016, Journal of neural engineering.

[22]  Jan B. F. van Erp,et al.  A Tactile P300 Brain-Computer Interface , 2010, Front. Neurosci..

[23]  K. Hong,et al.  Decoding four different sound-categories in the auditory cortex using functional near-infrared spectroscopy , 2016, Hearing Research.

[24]  Tobias Kaufmann,et al.  Beyond maximum speed—a novel two-stimulus paradigm for brain–computer interfaces based on event-related potentials (P300-BCI) , 2014, Journal of neural engineering.

[25]  Shangkai Gao,et al.  An Auditory Brain–Computer Interface Using Active Mental Response , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.