The Garfield impact factor, one of the fundamental indicators in scientometrics

The paper summarizes some basic features of the Garfield impact factor (GF). Accordingly, GF should be regarded as a scientometric indicator representing the relative contribution of journals to the total impact of information in a field. For calculating GF, both from theoretical and practical reasons the “ratio of the sums” method is recommended over the “mean of the ratios” method. Scientific advances are made by the most influential, presumably most frequently cited articles. The distribution of citations among the publications is skewed in journals. Consequently, the GF index will be influenced primarily by the highly cited papers. It follows, GF represents the most valuable part of the information in journals quantitatively, and even therefore it may be regarded as a reliable impact indicator.

[1]  P. Seglen,et al.  Education and debate , 1999, The Ethics of Public Health.

[2]  M. Amin,et al.  Impact factors: use and abuse. , 2003, Medicina.

[3]  Dag W. Aksnes,et al.  The effect of highly cited papers on national citation indicators , 2004, Scientometrics.

[4]  Michael Parkinson,et al.  The Evaluation of Research by Scientometric Indicators , 2011 .

[5]  Per O. Seglen,et al.  The Skewness of Science , 1992, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[6]  D. Aksnes.  CHARACTERISTICS OF HIGHLY CITED PAPERS , 2003 .

[7]  Peter Vinkler,et al.  The πv-index: a new indicator to characterize the impact of journals , 2010, Scientometrics.

[8]  Peter Vinkler,et al.  The π-index: a new indicator for assessing scientific impact , 2009, J. Inf. Sci..

[9]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  A multilevel meta-analysis of studies reporting correlations between the h index and 37 different h index variants , 2011, J. Informetrics.

[10]  Eugene Garfield,et al.  New factors in the evaluation of scientific literature through citation indexing , 1963 .

[11]  Péter Vinkler,et al.  The case of scientometricians with the "absolute relative" impact indicator , 2012, J. Informetrics.

[12]  Reinier Plomp,et al.  The significance of the number of highly cited papers as an indicator of scientific prolificacy , 1990, Scientometrics.

[13]  Peter Vinkler,et al.  The ź-index , 2009 .

[14]  R. BRIGHTMAN,et al.  The Social Function of Science , 1939, Nature.

[15]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Journal impact measures in bibliometric research , 2004, Scientometrics.

[16]  Peter Vinkler,et al.  Characterization of the impact of sets of scientific papers: The Garfield (impact) factor , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[17]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  Hirsch‐Type Index Values for Organic Chemistry Journals: A Comparison of New Metrics with the Journal Impact Factor , 2009 .

[18]  Peter Vinkler,et al.  Composite scientometric indicators for evaluating publications of research institutes , 2006, Scientometrics.

[19]  Peter Vinkler,et al.  Application of the distribution of citations among publications in scientometric evaluations , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[20]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  Characteristic scores and scales: A bibliometric analysis of subject characteristics based on long-term citation observation , 2007, J. Informetrics.

[21]  Jerome K. Vanclay,et al.  Bias in the journal impact factor , 2006, Scientometrics.

[22]  Carl T. Bergstrom.  Eigenfactor Measuring the value and prestige of scholarly journals , 2007 .

[23]  A. Schubert,et al.  Evaluation of Citedness in Analytical Chemistry: How Much is Much? , 1990 .

[24]  Jerome K. Vanclay,et al.  On the robustness of the h-index , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[25]  Jerome K. Vanclay,et al.  Ranking forestry journals using the h-index , 2007, J. Informetrics.

[26]  Jerome K. Vanclay,et al.  Impact factor: outdated artefact or stepping-stone to journal certification? , 2011, Scientometrics.

[27]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  Some facts and figures on highly cited papers in the sciences, 1981–1985 , 1992, Scientometrics.

[28]  P. Vinkler.  Evaluation of the publication activity of research teams by means of scientometric indicators , 2000 .

[29]  Reinier Plomp,et al.  The highly cited papers of professors as an indicator of a research group's scientific performance , 1994, Scientometrics.

[30]  J. E. Hirsch,et al.  An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output , 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[31]  Yang Tao,et al.  A Study on Development Planning for Management Science and Engineering , 2006 .

[32]  B. New,et al.  The Case Against , 2018, Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research.

[33]  J. D. Bernal,et al.  The Social Function of Science , 1967 .

[34]  Peter Vinkler,et al.  Model for quantitative selection of relative scientometric impact indicators , 1996, Scientometrics.