Stakeholder discourse and water management – implementation of the participatory model CATCH in a Northern Italian alpine sub-catchment

Abstract. The Water Framework Directive (WFD, directive 2000/60/EC) was created to ensure the sustainable use of water resources in the European Union. A central guideline included throughout the directive is a call for the participation of stakeholders in the management of these resources. Involving stakeholders is an important step to ensure that catchment management plans take into consideration local experience in the development of these plans and the impact of the plans on local interests. This paper describes and analyses the results of a series of workshops to facilitate implementation of the WFD at a catchment level based on the stakeholder participation model, CATCH. To test the usefulness of the CATCH model, developed for water management in a catchment area, a sub-catchment in an alpine valley in the north-east of Italy, the Alta Valsugana in the Province of Trento, was chosen as the setting for a series of workshops. In this valley water is fundamental for activities associated with agriculture, domestic use, energy production, sports and recreation. In the recent past the valley has had serious problems related to water quality and quantity. Implementation of water management plans under the WFD may lead to conflicts within the catchment between different stakeholder interest groups. Including stakeholders in the development of management plans not only follows the guidelines of the WFD but also could result in a more locally adapted and acceptable plan for the catchment. A new stakeholder analysis methodology was developed and implemented in order to identify the relevant stakeholders of the area and then two sets of workshops involving the key stakeholders identified were conducted in Spring 2006. The CATCH meetings were a new experience for the participants, who had to deal with both the principles of the WFD in general and the participation requirement in particular. During the meetings, the CATCH model played a very important role in structuring the participatory process. It provided a general framework consisting of a sequence of steps that helped the participants to reach the goal of the process: the identification and evaluation of measures to improve water management in the catchment. This test of the CATCH model showed it to be a dynamic and flexible tool, useful for structuring and guiding the participation process, without imposing undue restrictions on influencing the outcome of stakeholder participation in a small catchment.

[1]  Ronald K. Mitchell,et al.  Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of who and What Really Counts , 1997 .

[2]  Erik Mostert,et al.  The European Water Framework Directive and water management research , 2003 .

[3]  Stephen M. Redpath,et al.  Using Decision Modeling with Stakeholders to Reduce Human–Wildlife Conflict: a Raptor–Grouse Case Study , 2004 .

[4]  Kristen Purcell,et al.  Public Participation and the Environment: Do We Know What Works? , 1999 .

[5]  Nicole Darnall,et al.  Involving the Public: When Are Surveys and Stakeholder Interviews Effective?1 , 2004 .

[6]  T. Koontz,et al.  We Finished the Plan, So Now What? Impacts of Collaborative Stakeholder Participation on Land Use Policy , 2005 .

[7]  C. Driscoll,et al.  The Primordial Stakeholder: Advancing the Conceptual Consideration of Stakeholder Status for the Natural Environment , 2004 .

[8]  Daniel J. Decker,et al.  Public Participation in Wildlife Management: What Do Stakeholders Want? , 2004 .

[9]  CATCH: A Method for Structured Discussions and a Tool for Decision Support , 2005 .

[10]  Thomas C. Beierle,et al.  The Quality of Stakeholder‐Based Decisions , 2002, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[11]  S. Charnley,et al.  Evaluating public participation in environmental decision-making: EPA's superfund community involvement program. , 2005, Journal of environmental management.

[12]  T. Webler,et al.  What Is a Good Public Participation Process? Five Perspectives from the Public , 2001, Environmental management.

[13]  G. Rowe,et al.  Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation , 2000 .

[14]  CATCH: A Method for Structured Discussions and a Tool for Decision Support , 2005, Ambio.

[15]  CAS-No Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive and its , 2003 .

[16]  J. Edelenbos,et al.  Managing Stakeholder Involvement in Decision Making: A Comparative Analysis of Six Interactive Processes in the Netherlands , 2006 .

[17]  K. Broderick Communities in Catchments: Implications for Natural Resource Management , 2005 .

[18]  C. Pateman Participation and democratic theory , 1970 .

[19]  Rick L. Lawrence,et al.  Choosing Public Participation Methods for Natural Resources: A Context-Specific Guide , 2001 .

[20]  P. Dreier,et al.  The rebirth of urban democracy , 1993 .

[21]  S. Arnstein,et al.  Ladder of Citizen Participation , 2020 .

[22]  Glyn Davis,et al.  Mapping Public Participation in Policy Choices , 2002 .

[23]  Thomas C. Beierle USING SOCIAL GOALS TO EVALUATE PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN ENVIRONMENTAL DECISIONS , 2005 .

[24]  J. C. Thomas Public Involvement in Public Management: Adapting and Testing a Borrowed Theory. , 1990 .

[25]  J. C. Thomas Public Involvement and Governmental Effectiveness , 1993 .

[26]  Åsa Forsman,et al.  CATCH: decision support for stakeholders in catchment areas , 2002 .