Economic viability of a virtual ISP

Growing mobile data usage has led to end users paying substantial data costs, while Internet service providers (ISPs) struggle to upgrade their networks to keep up with demand and maintain high quality-of-service (QoS). This problem is particularly severe for smaller ISPs with less capital. Instead of simply upgrading their network infrastructure, ISPs can pool their networks to provide a good QoS and attract more users. Such a vISP (virtual ISP), for example, Google's Project Fi, allows users to access any of its partner ISPs' networks. We provide the first systematic analysis of a vISP's economic impact, showing that the vISP provides a viable solution for smaller ISPs attempting to attract more users, but may not maintain a positive profit if users' data demands evolve. To do so, we consider users' decisions of whether to defect from their current ISP to the vISP, as well as ISPs' decisions on whether to partner with the vISP. We derive the vISP's dependence on user behavior and partner ISPs: users with very light or very heavy usage are the most likely to defect, while ISPs with heavy-usage customers can benefit from declining to partner with the vISP. Our analytical results are verified with extensive numerical simulations.

[1]  Sangtae Ha,et al.  Secondary markets for mobile data: Feasibility and benefits of traded data plans , 2015, 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM).

[2]  Harish Viswanathan,et al.  A practical traffic management system for integrated LTE-WiFi networks , 2014, MobiCom.

[3]  Shaolei Ren,et al.  Entry and Spectrum Sharing Scheme Selection in Femtocell Communications Markets , 2013, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[4]  陈耕艺 无线网络新兵:Project Fi , 2015 .

[5]  Lixin Gao,et al.  How to lease the internet in your spare time , 2007, CCRV.

[6]  Sangtae Ha,et al.  A survey of smart data pricing , 2012, ACM Comput. Surv..

[7]  Nick Feamster,et al.  How many tiers?: pricing in the internet transit market , 2011, SIGCOMM.

[8]  Vincent W. S. Wong,et al.  A Constrained MDP-Based Vertical Handoff Decision Algorithm for 4G Wireless Networks , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[9]  M. Chatterjee,et al.  An Economic Framework for Dynamic Spectrum Access and Service Pricing , 2009, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[10]  WiFi access point pricing as a dynamic game , 2006, IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw..

[11]  Sangtae Ha,et al.  Offering Supplementary Network Technologies: Adoption Behavior and Offloading Benefits , 2015, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[12]  Chi Sun,et al.  A Constrained MDP-Based Vertical Handoff Decision Algorithm for 4G Wireless Networks , 2008, ICC 2008.

[13]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  The origin of bursts and heavy tails in human dynamics , 2005, Nature.

[14]  R. Srikant,et al.  Economics of Network Pricing With Multiple ISPs , 2006, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[15]  Jean C. Walrand,et al.  Fair end-to-end window-based congestion control , 2000, TNET.

[16]  Mung Chiang,et al.  RAT selection games in HetNets , 2013, 2013 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[17]  Jon M. Peha,et al.  Expanding Cellular Network Capacity with Multi-Network Access , 2018, 2018 IEEE 88th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC-Fall).

[18]  Kaveh Pahlavan,et al.  Handoff in hybrid mobile data networks , 2000, IEEE Wirel. Commun..

[19]  G. P. Pollini,et al.  Trends in handover design , 1996, IEEE Commun. Mag..

[20]  Ted Taekyoung Kwon,et al.  AMUSE: Empowering users for cost-aware offloading with throughput-delay tradeoffs , 2013, 2013 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.