Incorporating cost and environmental factors in quality function deployment using data envelopment analysis

Quality function deployment (QFD) is an important tool available to organizations for efficient product design and development. Traditionally, QFD rates the design requirements (DRs) with respect to customer needs, and aggregates the ratings to get relative importance scores of DRs. An increasing number of studies stress on the need to incorporate additional factors, such as cost and environmental impact, while calculating the relative importance of DRs. However, there is a paucity of methodologies for deriving the relative importance of DRs when several additional factors are considered. In this paper, data envelopment analysis (DEA) is suggested for the purpose. It is proved that the relative importance values computed by DEA coincide with traditional QFD calculations when only the ratings of DRs with respect to customer needs are considered, and when only one additional factor, namely cost, is considered. DEA provides a general framework facilitating QFD computations when more factors need to be considered. The calculations are explained using a step-by-step procedure and illustrations. The proposed QFD-DEA methodology is applied to the design of security fasteners for a Chinese company. Though traditional QFD calculations consider the ratings as cardinal numbers, DEA has the flexibility to treat the ratings as qualitative variables. This aspect is illustrated in a separate section.

[1]  Sevin Sozer,et al.  Product planning in quality function deployment using a combined analytic network process and goal programming approach , 2003 .

[2]  L. Seiford,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis in the Presence of Both Quantitative and Qualitative Factors , 1996 .

[3]  Avraham Shtub,et al.  R&D project evaluation: An integrated DEA and balanced scorecard approach ☆ , 2008 .

[4]  Ming-Lu Wu,et al.  Quality Function Deployment: A Comprehensive Review of Its Concepts and Methods , 2002 .

[5]  Fariborz Y. Partovi,et al.  A QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT APPROACH TO STRATEGIC CAPITAL BUDGETING , 1999 .

[6]  Ramalingam Shanmugam,et al.  At a crossroad of data envelopment and principal component analyses , 2007 .

[7]  Richard F. Deckro,et al.  Using and Abusing QFD Scores , 2002 .

[8]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  On the Use of Ordinal Data in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1993 .

[9]  Yoji Akao,et al.  Quality Function Deployment : Integrating Customer Requirements into Product Design , 1990 .

[10]  Kwang-Jae Kim,et al.  Determination of an Optimal Set of Design Requirements Using House of Quality , 1998 .

[11]  Fariborz Y. Partovi,et al.  An analytic model for locating facilities strategically , 2006 .

[12]  C. Kao,et al.  Efficiency analysis of university departments: An empirical study , 2008 .

[13]  Yaakov Roll,et al.  An application procedure for DEA , 1989 .

[14]  Y. Zhang,et al.  Green QFD-II: A life cycle approach for environmentally conscious manufacturing by integrating LCA and LCC into QFD matrices , 1999 .

[15]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Introduction to Data Envelopment Analysis and Its Uses: With Dea-Solver Software and References , 2005 .

[16]  A. Charnes,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis Theory, Methodology and Applications , 1995 .

[17]  Ming-Lu Wu,et al.  Quality function deployment: A literature review , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[18]  Miyoung Jeong,et al.  Quality function deployment: An extended framework for service quality and customer satisfaction in the hospitality industry , 1998 .

[19]  Barton A. Smith,et al.  Comparative Site Evaluations for Locating a High-Energy Physics Lab in Texas , 1986 .

[20]  Richard Y. K. Fung,et al.  A new approach to quality function deployment planning with financial consideration , 2002, Comput. Oper. Res..

[21]  Jürgen Bode,et al.  Cost engineering with quality function deployment , 1998 .

[22]  Matthijs Dekker,et al.  Quality function deployment in the food industry: a review , 2000 .

[23]  Gary S. Wasserman,et al.  ON HOW TO PRIORITIZE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS DURING THE QFD PLANNING PROCESS , 1993 .

[24]  Louis Cohen,et al.  Quality Function Deployment: How to Make QFD Work for You , 1995 .

[25]  Thomas J. Crowe,et al.  Using quality function deployment in manufacturing strategic planning , 1996 .

[26]  R. Ramanathan An Introduction to Data Envelopment Analysis: A Tool for Performance Measurement , 2003 .

[27]  Ming-Lu Wu,et al.  A systematic approach to quality function deployment with a full illustrative example , 2005 .

[28]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation , 1990 .

[29]  Abbie Griffin,et al.  The Voice of the Customer , 1993 .

[30]  M. Lu,et al.  Integrating QFD, AHP and Benchmarking in Strategic Marketing , 1994 .

[31]  Ramakrishnan Ramanathan,et al.  Data envelopment analysis for weight derivation and aggregation in the analytic hierarchy process , 2006, Comput. Oper. Res..